What to choose from C-class machines: Chevrolet Cruze or Opel Astra? What is better than Opel Astra or Chevrolet Cruz in what the difference

"Wir Leben Autos!" - The motto of the company Opel, Based on the century ago in Germany, reflects the responsible attitude of employees to the development and creation of innovative cars. Opel products are always distinguished by a reasonable quality ratio and price.

Chevrolet. Motor Division - The leading division of the GENERAL MOTORS financial and economic corporation, which specializes in the production of passenger cars and SUVs. Chevrolet cars are considered to be the most popular concern in a number of budget brands.

Thanks to the powerful engine and a balanced chassis, Opel Astra has attractive dynamic characteristics. Innovative technologies and modern design solutions created the most secure and comfortable car in three sets - Essentia., Enjoy, Cosmo..

In configuration Essentia. A wide range of body painting and several interior trim options are presented. Basic equipment consists of the following elements:

• Heated outdoor mirrors.
• Glass lifts in the front doors with an electric drive.
• Control door locks at a distance.
• Power steering.
• ABS is a system that prevents the wheel lock.
• CD 300 audio system.
• ESP®Plus Stability System.
• The function of separating the pedal node at an accident.
• Airbags for driver and passenger.
• Wheel disks 16 inches.
• Folding rear places ( 60:40 ).
• Alarm from theft.

Standard equipment equipment Enjoy Makes a trip more comfortable, and includes in addition to the database:

1. Cruise control.
2. CD 400 audio system.
3. Fog lights.
4. Wheel wheels 17 inches.

You can equip the car by an adaptive system of head lighting, which is triggered with a sharp turn. Available in ENJOY configuration and created by concern Opel, chassis management system - Flexride.. It adjusts the car suspension, and changes its rigidity to eleven speed modes.

Astra Cosmo. - Option of configuration for attracted customers who consider luxury inherent car attribute. Improve standard elements with additional equipment:

• On-board computer.
• Climate control with two zones.
• Electric parking brake.
• Function preventing the car rollout when starting on a slope.
• Heating front seats.
• Control keys on the steering wheel.
• Rear view mirrors with electrical drive.
• Parking system.

Opel Astra cars are presented with gasoline engines in two versions. The first motor has a modest power in 115 horsepowerand the second is already capable of 180 horsepower. Cars are manufactured with different types of transmission.

One of the most successful chevrolet models. All cars are equipped with modern equipment for safe movement:

• ESC Stability System.
• Cruise control.
• ABS anti-lock brake system.
• Parking camera rear view.
• Six airbags.

With the help of a special keyfob, you can control access to the car and control doors. To start or stop the engine, the START / STOP button is used.

Information and entertainment device installed on Chevrolet Cruze MyLink.. It makes it possible to manage all multimedia devices and always in touch. Using a USB connection, you can easily connect to your smartphone, and display the necessary information to the touchscreen vehicle.

Chevrolet Cruze is performed only with gasoline engines. Two motors have a volume 1.6 litersPower 109 and 113 horsepower. More powerful engine volume 1.8 L. possessed 141 hp.

What common

Cars Chevrolet Cruze and Opel Astra are designed on one platform Delta II.. The front-wheel drive Delta II was designed by German Opel Unit Engineers. The rear suspension on the platform is positioned as a semi-independent, and is considered a more wear-resistant than completely independent.

Chevrolet Cruze and Opel Astra brands have engines with turbocharged - an effective measure for increasing the power of a motor based on the compression of the incoming air using the energy of the exhaust gases.

What is the difference

CHEVROLET CRUZE car is somewhat inferior to Opel Astra in high-speed indicators. Opel's highway on the technical characteristics of acceleration and overall speed wins with an explicit advantage, because it is focused on rapidness. Overclocking up to hundreds of Opel 2.3 seconds fasterthan at Chevrolet.

Course stability Opel Astra in special modes, for example, in high speed corners, much more stable than the Chevrolet Cruze. The risk of driving or demolition of the car in Opel is significantly lower. Chevrolet handling, especially at limit speeds, leaves much to be desired.

The amount of fuel consumed by car affect the quality of gasoline and travel conditions. In all cases, the actual fuel consumption of Opel Astra 2% lowerthan in Chevrolet Cruze.

Interior Opel Astra is made using qualitative materials, looks expensive and noble. The assembly does not cause complaints that for German cars a good tradition. Internal decoration Chevrolet Cruze looks easier for plastic soft, and scratches quickly appear on it.

If we compare the trunk, then the Chevrolet is more compatible, and has a volume of 500 liters. The luggage compartment Opel is less than a quarter, and is represented in the amount of 375 liters.

The greater the minimum reversal radius, the worse the maneuverability of the car. The Chevrolet CRUZE parameters for this indicator have an advantage over Opel Astra by 15%.

What car choose

For trips to highways, especially at high speed, the Opel Astra preference should be preferred. The car clearly holds the road and easily controlled. In urban conditions, you can choose a more budget Chevrolet Cruze. Savings will be and when buying, and during operation, if there is a need to replace any unit.

If silence in the cabin plays an important role, then Opel Astra will satisfy this need for interest. External noises during the trip do not deliver anxiety. But Chevrolet Cruze, on the contrary, turns the driver with the crash of the suspension. Depreciation racks are not finalized, and serve as a source of noise.

On an uneven road, Chevrolet door seals are controversial.

To travel to the cottage, a large luggage space is needed, which is present in Chevrolet Cruze. If fast ride is not in priority, and get to the country site is planned in a calm mode, then Chevrolet will be the best option compared to Opel.

C-class cars. And it is not surprising. On the one hand, there is a fairly wide selection of economical, well-equipped cars, while prices remain relatively affordable, on the other - the presence of many cars similar to each other may even cause confusion. What is better, Chevrolet Cruise or Opel Astra? Both belong to both General Motors are issued. However, this is not twins. Each model has its advantages, and the shortcomings are traced. Let's tell about it in more detail.

Appearance

Fans of previous generations Opel Astra will not be disappointed. The continuity is visible to the naked eye. However, new trends should not be noted. It seems that the body is generally devoid of straight corners. All this gives Opel modern appearance. Plus perfect aerodynamics and adds a car sustainability on the road. The form corresponds to the content. Although Opel Astra and you won't call the racing car, the dynamic and speed characteristics are very and very worthy.

Designers also tried to give him some sportiness fence. And not to say that it was not possible. For example, the massive radiator grille gives the appearance of the car hint on the animal power and the grace. Good headlights turned out. Extracted along the housing, they are a little bit like the eyes of some infernal predator. But the bumpers are thinners - it is even somehow embarrassed from the overall concept of the car.

If you choose Cruise or Astra, focusing only on the body, it will win Opel. Despite some successful solutions, Chevrolet Cruze looks unfinished. But in this respect is perfect - nothing superfluous, everything is in its place.

Salon

Opel developers are clearly admirers of high-tech style. To make sure it is enough to look at the torpedo. Such a number of buttons, togglers and other types of switches you will see except on the interplanetary starrel. In order to study all this abundance, a considerable toliary of time will be required. But it is worth it, because then you can manage all the main functions of the car, even without releasing the view from the road. About the materials of the finish can not say anything bad, they are not high-quality, non-accurant seams are not at all.

Salon Chevrolet either did not stripped. Qualitative materials, no less accurate than a competitor, seams. Designers Chevrolet Cruze When working out the parts of the cabin, once again focused. There are also smooth lines of finishing elements, and the instrument panel, which the "wells" frames are divided into three parts. As a result, the instrument panel looks so stylish that, with other things being equal in the choice of Opel Astra or Chevrolet Cruze, it may well swing a cup of weights in favor of Chevrolet. Especially I would like to note the presence of many pockets, branches and other "whins". There is where to put small things to always be at hand.

Engine and transmission

To the services of Opel Fans Two. Both gasoline engines. One engine produces 180 "horses", the second - 101. Depending on personal preferences, you can choose. Are you a fan of active ride and crave a complete control over the car? At your service old good mechanics. Return mostly in the city and appreciate comfort and convenience (even at a loss of dynamics) - take the "automatic". Fortunately, he is good at Opel Astra: transfers switched without delays, it is possible to choose different algorithms.

Amateur Chevrolet selection a little bit. However, quite recently, Chevrolet Cruze also completed with two engines. Namely, the volume of 1.6 liters and the power of 109 horsepower for fans of minimalism and a volume of 1.8 liters with a power of one hundred forty with horses nuts. Another engine was recently added, which, when it seemed, a small amount of 1.4 liters produces exactly 140 horsepower. Plus, at the expense of a small volume, this motor has an enviable economy. In the Cruze VS Astra dispute, we put the plus card.

Behavior on the road

Chevrolet Cruze Test Drive:

As can be seen from, Cruise is not a particularly powerful car. It is good in the traffic jams of a modern major city (a beautiful "on Nizakh" contributes to this), but the Astre will definitely lose on the track. And Opel has all the settings "sharpened" at high speed. In a measure, the hard suspension perfectly "processes" all the irregularities of the track, well-adjusted steering will not give the driver to lose control over the car in a cool turn. Chevrolet has worse handling.

Opel Astra Test Drive:

Outcome

Let's summarize. The advantages of Opel Astra can be considered:

• stylish body;
• good aerodynamics;
• futuristic steering column;
• powerful engine;
• good transmissions;
• beautiful suspension and accurate steering.

No less advantages and Chevrolet Cruze. Namely:

• stylish headlights;
• beautifully decorated instrument panel;
• many pockets and departments for small things;
• large selection of power units.

So Astra or Cruze? An unambiguous answer is very difficult to give. Cruz a little cheaper and as mentioned above, well shown itself when traveling around the city. Element Astra Country Routes, but she will show himself at the traffic light. But it is already more expensive. So choose based on personal preferences - both cars are worthwhile.

Chevrolet Cruz successfully ranked its market share. It is a modern, reliable car with athletic mothers. Despite this, there are a number of competitive machines. They have both advantages against the background of Chevrolet Cruze and disadvantages. As a result, in the automotive market there is constantly struggle between various machines trying to attract the attention of buyers.

Chevrolet comparison Cruise and Ford Focus

Chevrolet Cruz has a number of advantages over Ford Focus. Conducting a comparison, the main of the advantages can be allocated:

• a more convenient steering wheel, especially compared to Ford Focus 3;
• good review from the driver's seat;
• the perfect design of the steering rack, which cannot boast Ford Focus 2.

Decide which car is better than Ford Focus or Chevrolet Cruze, the choice towards the first is possible for the following reasons:

• good suspension;
• high-quality material of the cabin;
• effective noise insulation.

Cars are in one price category. Their cost ranges from 800,000 to 1,200,000 rubles.

Chevrolet Cruze or Opel Astra

According to the reviews of car owners, Opel Astra is prone to breakage of the crankshaft sensor. With its malfunction, the engine becomes completely inoperable. A meter is installed on the billet of the oil pump housing. It creates a synchronization pulse thanks to which the controller determines the position and frequency of rotation of the crankshaft. According to this data, calculates the moment of operation of the nozzles and the ignition module Repair is possible only to replace the sensor. Chevrolet Cruz is somewhat reliable in this regard. The cost of Opel Astra is under the same limits as Cruze similar configuration.

Cruise against Toyota Corolla

Operation Toyota Corolla will allow you to identify the following features:

• many childhood diseases;
• the presence of crickets in the cabin;
• high engine sensitivity to fuel and oil quality;
• soft suspension;
• the cost is higher than the Chevrolet Cruz, and ranges from 1.2 to 1.5 million rubles;
• sufficient comfort.

Cruze or Skoda Octavia

Comparing the car Skoda Octavia and Chevrolet Cruz is given in the table below.

Chevrolet comparison Cruise and Volkswagen Polo

It is determined that the Volkswagen polo or Cruz can be better at the following advantages and disadvantages of the German:

• lack of "childhood diseases";
• good permeability;
• the cost less than those of Chevrolet Cruz;
• robbles rear suspension;
• slow heating of the cabin.

Chevrolet Cruze or Skoda Rapid

Comparing cars of Skoda Rapid and Chevrolet, car owners note the low reliability of the camshaft position measurement system on Cruze. In some cases, the engine continues to work, but at the same time there is a significant reduction in power and increase the fuel consumption. Determine the fault is quite difficult. This requires a diagnostic scanner. Eliminate the problem can only replace the sensor to the new one.

Comparison Cruze with Mazda

Chevrolet Cruz and Mazda are analyzed by key criteria in the table below.

Chevrolet comparison Cruz and Honda Civic

Honda Civic has advantages over Chevrolet Cruise, where the failure of the air flow sensor is often found. This leads to unpleasant friction and failures in acceleration. The motor begins to consume much more fuel. Troubleshooting is possible only by installing a new sensor.

Chevrolet Cruz and Citroen C4

Unlike Citroen C4 during the operation of the turbocharged Chevrolet Motor Cruz, extraneous sounds are often observed. The inappropriate design of the Opolev phase regulators leads to the engine dysseltic engine. The cooling system pump resource is also small, so it begins to whistle when running more than 60 thousand km. These problems are extremely rare on Citroen.

At the same time, C4 often gives problems with the failure of the suspension elements. Transmission is also impossible to call reliable. The cost of the car is ranging from 1.3 million to 1.8 million rubles.

Overview of other cars

Another car similar price segment is Kia LED. The machine is characterized by good handling and security. Kia is inferior to the chevrolet in the reliability of the main nodes.

Unambiguous answer What car is better than Chevrolet Cruze or Reno Fluence is not. The first has a more modern filling, and the second is slightly reliable.

Cruz came to replace the Chevrolet Lacetti. The car inherited all the best design predecessor decisions the main advantage of Lacetti is lower cost.

The quality of the main nodes Cruise compared to Chevrolet Epic and Chevrolet Aveo is almost at the same level. At the same time, EPICA has a smaller value. Experienced car owners, with other things being equal, recommended to choose Chevrolet Cruze.

Another competitor Chevrolet Cruz is Kia Cerato. The car is characterized by dynamic and comfort. According to the reviews of the quality of Kia a little worse than Cruze.

Extremely hot spores go between the owners of Cruz and Ford Mondeo. Both cars have similar characteristics and price segment. At the same time, most drivers recognize that handling on the track is better at Cruze.

Good day!

I want to tell the story of the short hold of Chevrolet Cruz. The car is not my first, when I chose some experience of the ownership was already, including Chevrolet. Only as it is bad forgotten quickly, and I bought for the fact that the past Chevrolet was Niva, our domestic car, and here it seems to be Korea, it seems inexpensive and rich. The erroneous was the opinion. I will make a reservation - it was Skoda Fabia to Cruz, maybe a small, but very worthy of all the relationship car. She asked a rather high bar when choosing the next car. Potential candidates were quite a lot, mostly the Japanese on the machine, really liked Lancer X 1.8 of my wife now. Here are the innovatives from candidates - all 2009 - Mitsubishi Lancer X 2.0, Mazda 3 2.0, Honda Civic Sedan, Toyota Corolla on the automatic transmission and no way on the robot, Skoda Octavia and many others. The Japanese were fine in principle, but everyone turned out to be their cockroaches ... Lance has a variator scared, Mazda is very low and gestable, Honda is low and problems with the steering rack, the Corolla is just close, boring, and just no. I'll say about Skoda Octavia that I liked it very much, but when I was seriously awarded the purchase decided to choose from new cars, and the octashka was expensive - 640 tyr. In the simplest configuration on the handle on the messengers, from the options only Conder. EVERYTHING! Volga is some kind of chesslovo ... and then it began to consider from new but already unfarch. Hyundai Solaris is a dynamic, very comfortable, only appeared, but the suspension junk and the machine itself, as it has shown the time not very reliable and simply itself is not very much. Kia Rio is better but also not super, besides close and small. Volks Polo Sedan almost bought it, on the full mince with the machine, it turned out not too expensive, new and quite nothing machine. I was already ready to buy it, but here we went with a friend in the next salon and saw him! Handsome, large, snow-white Chevrolet Cruise for the price of as a sedan polo. A tempting!

So. Conducted a test drive and I caught fire! The wife was discussed but retreated, it was useless to argue. A week later he became the owner of this snow-white handsome man. Motor 1.6, Avtomat, Basic equipment in which, it seemed, everything was needed - air conditioning, electric windows front, electric camera, heated sites and so on. It was Euphoria, life succeeded! Two days later, the seat was covered under me. It happens. Nonsense. I noticed wild fuel consumption - 25 liters in calm mode. It happens, running the same. I remembered that at Skoda, the flow was immediately low and almost for one hundred thousand kilometers did not change, to 8-10 in the city and on the highway in the region of 5-7 depending on the speed. I wrote off the consumption that the machine is still quite new and the engine is not Skodovsky, but the ancient Opolevsky like the last Nexia (no longer a pleasant comparison), and you need to suffer a little and everything will be normal, including constantly floating turnover of the engine (well, not It must be so on the new car!). He began to ride and every day he enjoyed - a large car, beautiful, on a machine, a lot of any buttons, on the road the car notice, stopped sticking out and trimmed, well, well, we accurately accustomed to this, the costs of Russian mentality. Over time, he began to notice back pain, the seats simply do not go anywhere. No steering steering in the initial configuration, there is no landing, the support of the back is simply not, it is not possible to get driving. Unpleasant. Two days later, the paint fall from the front bumper at the junction of the bumper and the wing - they refused to paint under warranty. The manager argued that it was chole from a pebble, but as he could get there, because the fool is clear - the bumper stands with distortion, on the other hand the bumper does not even fit to the wing! Nevertheless, the management argument was the Iron - St. Petersburg assembly, on the insignia, it is also completely and close. Okay not trouble, survive. I would like to separately tell about the quality of service in the Chevrolet car dealerships, we have 3 in Yekaterinburg, I will not call them. As far as competently, the Motor Show Motor Show, Dmitry, poured a bunch of gifts when buying a car, he did not fulfill a single promise, just a born Torgash. So competently, he managed to fall, yes, yes, it was exactly a deliberately low-quality product. The way the Ford dealers are different. Ford Focus 3 examined as an inexpensive alternative to the croise, the quality of finishing and assembly of both disappointed. Regarding the Russian assembly - it all depends on the manufacturer's plant, Skoda Fabia was Kaluga assembly and passed 100 thousand. km. Without a single breakdown, Skoda Octavia, I now also have to Kaluga assembly and there are no complaints, all at a high level.

My first comparative test Ford Focus and Chevrolet Cruze I managed to spend a year and a half ago, when Rostov fell asleep in the first snow. The disciplines that then managed to assess - the operation of the brake system and the driver's controllability, as well as the geometric permeability and accelerating dynamics of the cruise.

Pre-New Year winter evening. Rostov poured first snow, utilities as always do not cope. Food on Focus, put sixty-taganrog, is empty, slightly finish. Suddenly, from the adjacent street right in front of the nose, the girl is poured on a crunel - decided to slip at the crossroads, but the wheels are touched in the snowy caress and Chevrolet, it becomes more across the road. The steering wheel left, to the right, a skid, a snowdrift ... everything cost an encouraged bumper - thanks to the dealer for the winter Nokian Hakka donated, which to the end held the car on the trajectory.

And now we have almost summer, and all the same Ford with Cruise - but now all the advantages and disadvantages of cars can be estimated in a relaxed and relaxed atmosphere, and at the same time compare the popular models with another classmate - Opel Astra.

The appearance of all three test participants is modern, but by order of the challenge. Does the joke, for all the time the test on our "Trinity" drivers of passing cars drew attention only once - when one of the photographers climbed onto the roof of a high gazebo behind a good frame. Nevertheless, each of the models has its memorable design - the focus and cruise focuses on an aggressive front, and Astra in the body sedan is not an example of a promotorm-free GTC looks more imputy.

By the way, Opel Astra and Chevrolet Cruze recently survived the restyling, which had a positive effect on the appearance of the models. Waiting for the update and focus - and more radical than his competitors.

I will say right away - fully observe parity along today's test will not be able to assemble three cars at the same time in Rostov, where there are no official representative offices of companies, it turned out not so simple. They took cars from dealers, based on the principle "Take what they give." Hence, some scatter on the bodies (Focus in the body of the hatchback, and Cruze and Astra - sedans) and transmissions - (Ford model on the "handle", the other two cars with "automata").

Each interior is original, but the leader in the level of equipment and quality - Opel in the version of Cosmo

First I take the Chevrolet Cruze - the chip of his salon in bright fabric inserts that revive the interior. Despite the fact that the model has been produced for a long time, Chevrolet's interior decoration is still relevant. Ergonomics of Koreans turned out to be successful, except for finishing materials are slightly rude. Of the minuses - not very logical work of "climate", we climbed the car hastily and to understand the temperature settings accounted for on the go. Make it reflexively failed. The optional display of the CHEVROLET CRUZE multimedia system in the LTZ configuration deserves only a positive assessment - it does not even glare on the bright sun, and the speed and interface do not cause complaints.

Opel Astra Ford Focus Chevrolet Cruze

All three cars are available with "automata", but the focus went to the version on the "Mechanics". And a pity, since Fordershift is the most frisky on the gear shift

Replanting in Astra, you pay attention to the fact that the machines are made in essence on one platform. This is told about this details that notice only transplancing from the car in the car - the same ignition lock, as well as some secondary keys. But in general, the Salon Opel Astra gives the impression of more expensive and high-quality due to the leather-suede seats, tactile sensations from the buttons and a smaller number of hard plastic in the COSMO configuration. The same is the same as the cruise - the option "Sel-drove" is not here, only here you are addictive to the numerous buttons scattered on the center panel. But it looks all the stylish oval cabinet on wheels.

The focus salon is perhaps the most futuristic of today's "Trinity". Of course, adjusted to the expensive version of Titanium here the best finish materials, but also in simpler equipment Focus Trend and Trend Sport, despite the absence of a number of options, the salon is not worse. For design - first place. But behind more closely than in classmates - after all, it is primarily a driver for the driver.

Landing is more convenient in Astra - because of her steering wheel, getting up once, and I do not want to get out. Seat moderately rigid, with good lateral support, and behind the space for passengers Astra-Sedan again looks preferable. Win on the practicality and trunk of sedans - in focus it is less, due to the body of the hatchback. But for comparison, I looked into the luggage separation of the sedan in the Ford dealer salon, it is longer and more cooable, although the loading height is large due to the high line of raised floor. But on the convenience of opening-closing the luggage compartment, the Astra loses the circle and focus, the trunk is just not opening the outside - either from the key or from the cabin.

Expected Outsider on the dynamics of overclocking - Chevrolet Cruz. The fact is that the test you got a car with a basic engine. In a tandem with a six-speed "automatic", such an engine has a calm ride. But Cruz became the most economical for the test - less than 10 liters when driving around the city with air conditioning included!

And those who want more, you can safely recommend Cruz with a motor 1.8 - one hundred forty "horses" under the hood is already enough for those who love to be stuck.

By the way!

And the most voracious - Ford Focus, the flow rate in the city never falls below 11, even in a calm ride mode. But the focus is perceived more dynamic - and not only the test 125-strong, but also weaker, with 105 "horses" under the hood. To "Mechanics" - no complaints, transfers are stuck clearly, and the clutch "light" and informative.

I can not not say a few words about the preselative "robot" PowerShift is still more popular such a version in Russia. On the one hand, the six-steps box switches quickly, without lag. On the other hand, when urban driving in traffic jams, it does not cost without "pins" when switching to the second and third, and with the growth of the run, such a "diagnosis" is only enhanced.

Opel Astra with a turbine develops already 140 hp That in the "absolute standby" makes it the fastest, risk of 100 km / h Arrow of the speedometer overlaps in less than 9 seconds. The hydromechanical "automatic" is not such a tiny, as the robot of the focus, but it copes with its work more smoothly. It is better to be implemented and manual mode - with a compulsory transition to the lowered, you can safely go on acceleration.

As for the work of the suspension, the machines are configured each in its own way. Astra and Cruz are more comfortable to comfort, subjectively machines are perceived softer than focus. Ford is tougher, but is managed gambling - the chassis is configured to take into account lovers ride quickly, and not by the best roads. Riding on the highway on all three participants in the test is easy - after all, the abyss in the settings of the chassis compared to the "state employees" is huge here. At a decent level and noise insulation of all three cars, but there are leaders and outsiders here. The most quiet still Astra, and then follow descending Cruise and focus.

As soon as there was a loss of cars ahead, Ich the gas pedal to the floor, and then sharply braking - all three cars slow down without surprises, and the ABS grasps on time. The exact measurements could not be done, but the Astra slows down to the subjectively, the Astra slows down, a little worse - focus with Cruise.

It's time to return cars to dealers, and we think about those who are still the best in today's trio. An explicit winner, our test did not reveal - each model has its advantages and disadvantages, as well as numerous armies of fans. By the way, the reviews of the Ford Focus owners, Chevrolet Cruze and Opel Astra on the forums coincided in many ways and with today's impression of cars.

Chief Trump Chevrolet Cruze is an excellent combination of prices and consumer qualities. Modern design, good equipment, and after recent restyling also turbo engines as an option - all this makes cruise one of the best offers in the classroom. Cons Cruise - an abundance of hard plastic in the cabin and a weak motor in the "base".

Astra-sedan is one of the most practical and comfortable cars in its segment. For similar parameters, it is a bit more expensive built on the same cruise platform, but also wins in the level of equipment and finishing. In a word, if there is an opportunity to pay extra - it makes sense to make a choice in favor of Opel.

Focus - selection of an active driver. In terms of controllability, it puts on both blades of competitors, on an equal rival with the legislator of the genre in the class - VW Golf. At the same time, Ford is noisy, hard and voracious. Feels perceived by a more youth car, especially in the hatchback body.

Who is against?

Today's test did not cover the numerous family of the concern VAG - Skoda Octavia, VW Golf and Seat Leon (the cost of "medium" complete sets of 800-850,000 rubles, "Top" - in the area of \u200b\u200bMillion). No less significant competition is both the "Japanese" with the models of Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic and Mazda 3 - on average from 700,000 rubles for the "basic" versions, and up to a million for "full minced".

Prices

Specifications:

The editors thanks assistance in the organization Test Drive:

• , official dealer Chevrolet,
• , Official Opel Dealer
• , official dealer Ford