Comparison of Nissan Cascai and Ford Eloctal. Ford EcoSport against Nissan Juke. Scary beautiful. Challenges and Comfort

Why do people buy urban crossovers? They are not so economical as microllers, in practicality are inferior to ordinary parquets, and on riding qualities losing compact hatchbacks. Nevertheless, such cars do not leave the public indifferent, even despite a relatively considerable price. What is their attractiveness, let's try to figure out the example of the test of Ford EcoSport and Nissan Juke models.

Interior and exterior

The design refers to the obvious advantages of sitters, and the test participants here is no exception. If the Nontrivial Styling of the Japanese Parketnik still causes a dispute, then the exterior of the "American" is tailored to classic patterns with an eye on SUV lovers. With the "Mud Mud" "Ecosport" navigate the short sinks of the body, high ground clearance (200 mm) and a spare wheel made on the luggage door. True, the interior of the Fordovsky crossover was copied at the Fiesta small trap and, rather, they will like a teenager than the fan of the "Off Roud" fan. Nissan has an original salon and decomposed with better materials. At the same time, in terms of the ergonomics of the decisive advantage there is no one. Juk wins in visibility and convenience of the front armchairs, but "Ecosport" offers a more spacious salon and provides the best comfort to passengers of the second row. In other words, the Japanese car cares more about the convenience of the driver, and his rival is passengers.

The more volumetric trunk has Ford: 400 liters vs. 380 liters. In addition, its compartment has a broader loading window and a low edge. On the other hand, the layout of the cargo branch from "Dzhuka" is better thought out. The trunk "American" is equipped with a swing flap, which is more convenient than the traditional vertically open door. However, in the conditions of dense city parking, it can create inconvenience.

EQUIPMENT

The best equipment of safety devices demonstrates "Ecosport", which in the "base" is equipped with seven air plugs, while "Juk" is protected by six. A set of active safety systems in both cars is equal: ABS, EBD brake force distribution system, Emergency braking amplifier BA, ESP dynamic stabilization system. Also "Nissan" is equipped with a cruise control with a speed limiter. At the same time, the Japanese crossover, in contrast to the opponent, no adjustment of the steering column will be adjusted.

Challenges and Comfort

The ford power plant consisted of a 3-cylinder gasoline motor with a volume of 1.0 liters (125 hp / 170 nm) and a 5-speed mechanical gearbox. "Nissan" was driven by a 1.2-liter gasoline engine (116 hp / 190 nm) and a 6-speed manual box. Despite the loss in the traction, "Ecosport" showed the best acceleration dynamics based on the results of most measurements, giving way to "Juku" only in the time of acceleration from space up to 100 km / h (10.82 C against 10.66 s). But the measurement of the brake path of the winner did not reveal. At the stop from speed 60/80/100/120/140 km / h "American" spent 14/25/39/55/75 meters, his competitor with a vertically opening door 14/25/38/55/77 m.

Comparison of the fuel consumption data was in favor of Ford, which consumed in the route / city of 6.4 / 7.2 liters of gasoline per 100 km. "Nissan" "PALIL" in the same conditions 6.9 / 7.8 liters.

"Juk" - the car is bright not only externally, but also in its essence. This is a real GTI among crossovers. Aggressive and fast he can give a lot of pleasant minutes driving. As if guessing the wishes of active drivers, the Japanese equipped the machine with an adaptive electric powerful, turned off ESP and a system that allows you to exacerbate the responses of the accelerator and the steering wheel by selecting the sports mode in the display menu on the center console. True, not all in the behavior of the "Japanese" definitely - still his reaction sometimes is overlooking the usual driver. But it only reinforces the driver's driver's reputation.

"Fords" crossover on the road is the direct opposite of the "Japanese": the dimensional reactions and the valve in the turns are forced to drive a car slowly, like a large SUV. At the same time, Ecosport is always safe and predictable. As compensation for the phlegmatic nature of the car, the driver and passengers receive an energy-intensive suspension, effectively smoothing road flashes and good noise insulation of the cabin. "Nissan" Riding Comfort is pleased with less, but also a disappointing Japanese parckarter in this regard will not be called.

VERDICT

Throwing packaging, compactness and the ability to look at the thoughts in the thread - this is what the minicrossers love. But these advantages are not limited. For example, Ford EcoSport is also a riding comfort, and Nissan Juke has drivers. That is the outcome of the test, then the hard victory is celebrating "Ford", the strong parties of which, in addition to comfort, are a frisky and economical motor, as well as a democratic price. Compared to "Juku", "American" is almost three thousand euros * cheaper, and this is a significant difference for such a class.

According to the "highway" (Spain)

Data obtained during test

Factory characteristics

If earlier, possessing the amount in a million with a small thousand rubles, it was possible to put it on the all-wheel drive crossover with a good power (and not even the youngest class), then today for this money you will be offered. Similar cars we have already been tested in the fall. Today I found another reason to return to the topic. Recently updated Nissan Juke, Ford EcoSport also appeared on the market. Ecosport is longer "by passport", but do not forget that about 26 cm length eats a spare place. And without it, Ford is even shorter of Nissan on 12 with small centimeters. "Japanese" also a little more wheelbase - by 11 mm. In width parity, and above was Ford with an advantage of 64 mm EcoSport was born in an unsuccessful time. Immediately rose in price, which even stronger demanded demand. For example, a test car in the configuration "Titanium" was estimated by more than 1.4 million rubles, when I took it to the test. However, during the time spent with us, the car managed to chef. Ford announced a decline in prices, and a week later I returned the EcoSport already worth 1,299,000 rubles. And at the time of publication, the price decreased to 1,239,000 rubles. Funny time. Nevertheless, the cheaper crossover still turned out to be noticeably more expensive than the renewed Jucket. With some additional options, the price tag of the latter was 1,126,000 rubles.
With very similar sizes, cars look different. EcoSport is thin, elongated, and Juke - low and wide must be said that the career of the ecosport in general from the very beginning somehow was not set. The sales of the model in Europe did not go, and in the first months the car showed statistics at times worse than opponents in the face of Peugeot and Opel. In Ford, they thought and announced that soon the car would receive an update. And it will be an intricate fifth door with a possession attached on it.
Ecosport looks peculiar. Obviously, he wants to resemble serious "passing", and the old school. Here and the silver decor in the front is like powerful motor protection. Rear - a large spareside under the case. But with this size, in spite of everything, the appearance is still quite harmless first, this "stepper" will make a free option (for lovers of such a style, apparently). Secondly, plan to modify the mechanism of opening the door of the trunk (about this later). Agree, it is unlikely that such news is able to raise sales of the original version. However, in the Russian representation I was told that the renewed door would not get to us soon, and in Europe it was not yet decided when it would be given to such an option. Therefore, the ecosport for Russia in the current form is still relevant.
The rear of Ford is notable for the fifth door. The reserve forced to resort to the side opening mechanism. Door handle pulled effectively in the right lantern. Stylish, but sometimes inconvenient from the "Japanese" with image and selling order. And after the update, the car has become even prettier and more modern. In front of the flavor added a new form of the upper headlights - it is approximate to the general correction style. Lenses and xenon are now available in the "sauces". More interesting drawing of a falseradiator lattice. Required bumpers and rear lights. The goal is achieved, now when you see dorestayling joke, you immediately understand - he is more boring new.
Updated Juke has changed decently. The shape of the upper headlights is adjusted, in the central circles you can now find xenon, the falseradiator grille, wheel drives and bumper at the bottom of the bottom are updated. The refreshment is good - the car began to look a modern car you can additionally decorate - put discs with color inserts, and in the interior to order yellow inserts and sports chairs. I saw a car with such a set of accessories - it looks really bright and interesting.
Rear changed drawing of lanterns and again the shape of the bottom of the bumper. The characteristic profile of Juku with the updated details became brighter Ford on the background of Nissan looks everyday and pragmatic. Even despite the very cheerful blue metallic and a rich finish of the front under chrome. In general, his design is not bad. Cute front part, with small neat headlights and high fog, strict sidewall lines. The practical exterior of the wagon. I will venture to suggest, by the way, that without spinning part of the charm will be lost and the rear part will be Kutya. In general, Nissan Juke has a greater appearance in this pair. But even then with the reservation - if you are already accustomed to his design and accepted it. If not, then more preferable more traditional Ford EcoSport. I open the light door of the Japanese and immediately notice that there are very few changes. Rather, they are practically no. The central panel is former, with a small touchscreen display at the top and a fun climate control unit. But the visor over the instruments were covered with a material resembling the skin, it became prettier.


Dzhuk's rounded interior has not changed. Visor acquired a more status trim under the skin. The three-speech steering wheel is convenient, and the gearbox lever is set high to not reach. There is not enough steering adjustment by departure, but in general the landing is comfortable. Review is excellent. And back - no, but the circular survey system helps. The devices are read well and look more interesting than a competitor. A touchscreen display and climate control control unit is also definitely better and modern landing in an updated car - unchanged. Adjusting the steering wheel on the flight as it was not and not, but it will appear only on the next generation of the car. I am with my 187 cm can find a comfortable landing behind the wheel, although at first it seems that I sit closer than I would like.


On the central tunnel - the cup holders and the heating keys of the seats. Giukuk's glitter packaging than that of the opponent the salon inside seems wider than that of the enemy. A wide wavy hood is visually working on this, which is perfectly visible from the first row. It is funny to sway on the waves, something resembling on Infiniti Q70. And the upper convex headlights allow you to feel good to feel the front of the car. Add here an optional circular review system and you will understand that the Japanese amounted to a very correct recipe for the conquest of mass recognition of women.


A number of additional car functions can be used to the left keys from the left of the steering column. The visor is covered with "under the skin". Juke is still happy with pretty designer elements in the cabin transplant to the ecospa. Landing here is higher and vertical, there are no problems with it. Adjusts enough. True, when I occupy a comfortable position, I must accept the person to sit down for me well, it's very subtitle. Also it will not be possible to completely fold the back of the seats of the second row, it will strive in my chair. In Jucket, a similar story. Small cars, nothing can be done.


The interior decoration is largely copied by the Fiesta hatchback. However, plastic is everywhere oak, and the quality of fitting parts is not impressive. On the door panel - a soft armrest and a shallow pocket with a shot under the container with a drink. The devices are well read, but look cheap. Monochrome information display - hello from the past. The climate control control unit is also ascetic, although it is trying to impress the unusual form interior of the ecospa, it is not sporty, but economically. Plastic everywhere oak, gray and unsightly (in Jucket you will not find on the torpedo of elastic plots, but the panel looks more pleasant). There is no color display here. It is generally impossible to order it, even for the top version with a two-liter engine and a full drive. Yes, and the quality of the salon assembly places lame.


On the tunnel - three cup holders and small niches. On the lever "Robot" at the top of the already traditional for the Fords a bileclock gear key. An additional outlet is found in the niche between the right seat of the second row and the door. It is impossible to order a color display, only such a schematic monochrome screen is available. It is controlled by the swirling blind buttons below. The management algorithm is intricate, at first, it requires attention to control the radio tape recorder and climate in the ecospaite less convenient than in the competitor. And you still need to look closely to a small display - fonts are small and thin. And you can't do a discount on the class here, because the price.


Behind the podium of the RCP selector 12-volt socket and USB input. To the left of the steering column, the developers attached a small compartment for storing small things in the back of the place and there, and here. Adults adults above average growth are spelled out on the second row only short and in the city. As for the trunk, then both cars are not so car. A similar stock of space is used in different ways. Ford has an oblong and fairly deep compartment, where large bags will have to put each other. Nissan - the trunk is wider, but highly located and the opening is small. But there is a comfortable underground.

Jucket seats (here and hereinafter - the photo on the left) are better desposted and generally more convenient than that of the opponent. They are tightly fitting and better kept in turns. Ford's armchairs (here and hereinafter - the photo on the right) - more flat. But there is a practical bonus - a sliding niche is located under the seat

Behind closely in both cars. In Ford a little more than the stock of the space above the head, but the weather does not. In general, the person of the middle and above growth here will be closely. Nowhere to put legs, little stock in the shoulders feature Ford - the fifth door. It opens aside and is equipped with a gas shock absorber, which works sporing and well helps to paint heavy design. One bad thing - the door is fixed only in extreme positions. It is necessary to hold her hand or always break the lash. The company promises to refine the design. But how gracefully stubborn handle in the right lamp. For this designers, thanks, more such here are raisins in mass production!


In front-wheel drive juk, the volume of the trunk is increased and is 354 liters (1189 liters with decomposed sequences of the second row seat). Ford has such indicators - 310 and 1238 liters. The fifth door of the juk is not enough, and the loading height is large. Not very comfortable. Ford has a different problem. The fifth door door is equipped with gas emphasis and has only two extreme positions, and there is a sideways. Yes, and the width of the trunk is not enough. Another nuance. If the driving driver is driving, then in order to fold the backs of the second row, its chair will have to move forward. Jucket has the same problem. But he has underground in his trunk at all, behind the wheel of Djuca there is a feeling that you are sitting in a small sports compartment. And when you start moving, you are not disappointed at all. It is controlled by gambling. And even with not the most powerful 1.6-liter atmospheric spurs to a dynamic ride. There are 18-inch discs with low-profile wide rubber. And the suspension is tougher than the opponent. Jook smoothes less, whitly dives into turns, following the ram with minimal delays. The machine is quite lightweight, and therefore it is quite clear in his reactions. With Jukuk, you quickly find a common language and go to the conquest of rapid turns.
Jook even with not the strongest motor - a provocateur, makes it go faster. Handling is acute. It can be slightly "soften" by ordering 16-inch discs with 205/55 rubber instead of optional 18-inch with tires 225/45 at this somehow immediately cease to pay attention to the fact that it is, for example, no more rival. There are better arms and streets. More sounds from the motor and stepless transmission. But how Juk holds the trajectory in a rapid blurry, with a minimal roll and without a hint of a horizontal star, if a wave suddenly go on the road. Immediately remember that in his bowels, Nissan "packed" filling from GT-R, creating an unsurpassed show car.
Under the prime character of this crossover, a box is different from the variator. Nissanovsky X-TRONIC is not bad, but the control of the management still has "blurred outlines" and Ford? Is there a desire for the company's representatives to cross EcoSport with a transmission and a motor from a new Ford GT supercar? Personally, I did not hear anything about it. Apparently, this is the difference of approaches. A big bet is made to Jucket and love the creators of it is stronger. Hence the result. However, it is too early to write off the Cute Blue Crossover. EcoSport, although deprived of pronounced driver charisma, is still endowed with the birth of good behaviors on the road and even a little abroad.
Ford is also managed very thoroughly. The suspension is generally more comfortable than the "Japanese", the reaction is more smoothed. The level of driving comfort is higher on the "sixteenth" wheels, with a slightly large clearance, it allows you to better feel on the roads without asphalt, and in the city it is moved, it is not particularly tracking the position of the hatches, defective and worn cloth. Ecosport has a more energy suspension. It became well noticeable when we left for country roads, tapping under the rays of the early-Spring Sun. It should be noted that the Ford electric powerfulness is well configured. In general, this car is quite friendly to the driver. Yes, and in limit modes is clear. Ecosport is less sensitive to Kae (but it must also be taken into account and the difference in rubber). True, it felt that he is heavier than the enemy. Hence the worst dynamics and greater fuel consumption.
A more powerful motor does not guarantee ecosport better dynamics, even despite a terminated robotic transmission. All because Ford is heavier than 140 kg in what the Jook loses to the opponent, so it is in the gearbox. Still, the variator is a variator. And no new new thing in this genre said no one. Slightly stretched reactions to the driver's requests and the need for not to ceremony with the accelerator pedal is still characterized by it. But the robotic KP progress and this demonstrates Ford, whose PowerShift works quickly and smoothly. Moreover, it makes it easy and effortless to touch, almost like on the usual "automatic". And in sports mode pleases rapid switches down under the verified "Peregazovka".

Jook more economical ecosport. Consuming about ten liters of fuel in mixed mode with the advantage of the city. Ecosport "drank" in the region of 11 liters to "hundred" we did not find complaints about the brakes either or another car. But it should be noted that more expensive Ford is equipped with drumming mechanisms on the rear axle, while on Nissan disk mechanisms.

Both cars from below are typical front-wheel drive cars with slightly enlarged clearance. There is no additional protection here. The lower points are subframes and exhaust systems, it turns out that both the picture is like an appearance. A progress and more gambling Nissan is less practical. And Ford, endowed with such expressive manageability, nevertheless loyal to the coating, quieter and more comfortable. The conclusion for me the winner in the confrontation is obvious - Nissan Juke. In this pair, it is preferable to the opponent. It is prettier, high quality and more interesting inside. It goes faster and consumes less fuel, it is modern and finally cheaper. Only design remains. Many still skeptically evaluate the external data of this car. But here, as they say ... As for the ecospa, it is a choice of pragmatics. A person loyal to the Ford brand or that buys this particular car from some other personal considerations. He is not very practical than the same juk, the same close and not too spacious. But, unfortunately, the energy intensity of the suspension and the best sound insulation is not enough in order to circumvent such a charismatic competitor as old JUKE.

Configuration and prices

Safety

Specifications (manufacturers)

Photo tabonus

Today we will talk about the parcktails. No, not so - let's talk about crossovers, because the word "PARTNER" sounds almost gone. We will try to conduct an objective comparison of Renault Captures and Ford Ecosport. And at least both monompaulous cars, and, frankly, do not have an impressive permeability, they are indisputable segment leaders.

So, Ford Ecosport was first introduced in 2003 as the development of specialists of the Brazilian branch of the concern. The car was based on the same platform as Ford Fusion, and Latin America became the main market market (ecosport 1 in Europe did not come). Until 2011, the company managed to sell about 700 thousand car copies. In 2012, in India, the Americans presented ecosport 2, also developed in Brazil, but already with ambitions for exports around the world.

In 2016, the ecosport has undergone a serious upgrade, which even more adapted the model to European realities. From the point of view of security, the car is included in the top five in the segment.

Covers first lit up in public in 2013 and almost immediately attributed himself to the bestsellers of the world market. One of the reasons for this, according to most analysts, is that the car is built on the basis of the already sensational modular platform Klio 4..

In 2016, the French presented the modernized version of the crossover, later a recognized second generation model. To somehow designate it, in the English version of the car name, the first letter "C" was replaced by "K". The car received a more reliable suspension and a modular trapping platform. The security system of the caps is about the same as the ecosport.

What's better? In this aspect, the French car looks stronger.

Appearance

Cars have a completely ordinary design of the exterior, as for representatives of the segment of parkets. But between them you can see a number of serious differences. The exterior of the caps is decorated very progressively and brightly, there is a combination and dynamism in it. Ecosport, in turn, can offer a very assembled and aggressive appearance, which can and inferior to its visa in brightness, but according to the dynamics exactly not worse than him.

The front of the caps is equipped with a large convex windy window, a drop-down hood, branded lattice of the radiator and a powerful bumper with an aggressive air intake. Front of ecosport can offer a similar "lobovuhu" and bumper, but a false radiator lattice is completely different, and, as experts noted, more delicate than the opponent, bumper.

Side cars are also quite different. Captures has more volumetric arches of the wheels, and the surface of the profile is smooth and has no firewall or ribbies, which they definitely do not say about the ecospa.

Rear cars have much more general moments, but not even the most experienced motorist instantly differences them.

Our verdict: the desired victory of the Captures in this local confrontation.

Salon

No matter how hard the American developers were trying, they could not achieve the planned, regarding the ECOSPORT salon. The inner decoration of the crossover, though improved compared to the predecessor, but still noticeably inferior to the caps.

In the interior of the "Frenchman" there is no luxury and premium, but it is his simple concise design and attracts motorists. The compact dashboard of the caps looks much more cute than the "American" squeezed console. But the steering wheel of the bustard of ecosport.

As for the capacity, the French crossover looks like a clearly stronger here. But the quality of finishing materials is higher in Ford Eosport, which has become real surprises for experts and analysts that did not expect such such.

Specifications

Regarding the "filling" both models have a lot in common. We specifically picked up two approximately equal versions and opposed them to cross through this "equality" and still decide on the choice of crossover. So, caboats and ecosport are equipped with 2 l gasoline units connected to the full drive. The body of the "Frenchman" is 60 mm longer than ecosport, but below it is 57 mm. The magnitude of the wheelbase is more from the "Frenchman" - 2673 mm / 2519 mm. Road clearance is also higher at capes, but only 1 mm - 204 mm / 203 mm. Most of all surprises the fact that the ecosport is heavier than the French model - 1488 kg / 1405 kg, although inferior in the dimensions of its visa. The capacity of the trunk is naturally more at the caps - 387 l / 333 liters. As for the wheels, the cabs and ecosport are equipped with 17 and 16-inch elements, respectively.

The aggregates of both cars have 2 liters and function on gasoline. In terms of recoil, they are approximately equal - 143/140 horsepower, in favor of the cabo. This resulted only in a non-essential superiority of the "Frenchman" in the dynamic indicators. His time of acceleration from place to hundreds is 11.2 s, which is only 0.3 with faster than the ecosport. But the American can boast greater efficiency - 8.3 l / on average.

Price

Both companies have always been famous for their loyal pricing policies, and in this case they decided not to change their principles: the average cost is 1,110 thousand rubles, and for its American competitor, 1,135 thousand rubles should be paid. The difference is minimal that perfectly fits into the overall nature of the comparison. But it must be remembered that the caplight is noticeably richer basic equipment.

Ford Ecosport 2017-2018 - new product from the concern from the USA. In the car upgraded many characteristics and data.

Nissan Cascais 2017-2018 - a new model from the concern from Japan.

The American machine has dynamic and directed external data. The appearance of the car will emphasize the "pseudo-road" body kit, which gives the boldness and aggressiveness of the usual SUV. The car also updated the luggage door - it can now be opened in a limited plane. In general, the car looks solid, rapidly and will definitely find its client.

As for the new Nissan Cashkai, then in his appearance there are sharp bends of the body, almost in all the appearance there are different firewalls that give modernity and the style of cars. It is also worth noting that the head optics are now improved. Lanterns are eager, as well as it is worth noting small round fog lights. The radiator grille has air intake dampers. Designers upgraded the car and improved the dynamics.

Interior Ford Education and Nissan Casca

Inside the five local Ford, ecosport also looks bold and fresh. In the front panel and on the doors, many multifaceted chips, original protrusions and smooth surfaces are used. It looks all this very youth. Inside the machine has a modernized dashboard in a chrome-plated frame, and the "handler" is now somewhat different, another company says that noise insulation is improved.

The equipment includes: satellite navigation system, camera from the back of the machine and a winter complex with heating zone "janitors", external mirrors and heating of the front seats.

Inside Nissan Casca, although it does not have unlimited space, but all sitting in the car will feel comfortable enough. Interior decoration is decorated stylish with smooth outlines and soft plastic - and on the front panel, and on the doors. It is also worth highlighting the front seats that have pronounced, almost sports support on the side, the back does not get tired even with sufficiently long movements.

It is also worth noting that manufacturers have improved noise insulation. Equipment includes: halogen optics, air conditioning, cruise control system, anti-slip braking structure, assistant when starting to rise.

Video

Start selling in Russia

Both Ford Ecosport and Nissan Cascaia will begin to sell from the second half of 2017 from the second half of 2017.

Package

Ford Eloctal:

• Trend - Motor 1.6 liters. 122 "Horses", gasoline, box - MT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 12.5 s, speed - 180 km / h, consumption: 9.1 / 5.3 / 6.7
• Trend + - Motor 1.6 liters. 122 "Horses", gasoline, box - MT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 12.5 s, speed - 180 km / h, consumption: 9.1 / 5.3 / 6.7
• Motor 1.6 l. 122 "Horses", gasoline, box - AMT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 12.5 s, speed - 175 km / h, consumption: 9.2 / 5.7 / 6.9
• Motor 2 l. 140 "horses", gasoline, box - MT, drive on both axes, acceleration - 11.5 s, speed - 180 km / h, consumption: 11.5 / 6.6 / 8.4
• Titanium, titanium + - Motor 1.6 liters. 122 "Horses", gasoline, box - AMT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 12.5 s, speed - 175 km / h, consumption: 9.2 / 5.7 / 6.9

Nissan Qashqai:

• Xe - Motor 1.2 l. 115 "Mare", gasoline, box - MT, CVT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 10.9 / 12.9 seconds, speed - 185/173 km / h, consumption: 7.9 / 5.4 / 6.3 and 6.7 / 5.2 / 5.7
• SE - Motor 1.2 l. 115 "Mare", gasoline, box - MT, CVT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 10.9 / 12.9 seconds, speed - 185/173 km / h, consumption: 7.9 / 5.4 / 6.3 and 6.7 / 5.2 / 5.7
• Motor 2 l. 144 "mares", gasoline, box - MT, CVT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 9.9 / 10.2 seconds, speed - 184/194 km / h, consumption: 10.8 / 6.1 / 7.8 and 9.3 / 5.6 / 7.0
• Motor 1.6 l. 130 "mares", diesel, box - CVT, drive on the front axle, acceleration - 11.2 s, speed - 183 km / h, consumption: 5.7 / 4.6 / 5.0
• Motor 2 l. 144 "Mares", gasoline, box - CVT, drive on both axles, acceleration - 10.5 seconds, speed - 182 km / h, consumption: 9.6 / 6.1 / 7.4
• Hardware SE +, City, City 360, Le, Le Roof, Le +, Le Sport - Dvig. The same as in the equipment above.

Gabarits.

• D * W * in Nissan Cascai - 4377 * 1837 * 1595 mm
• D * w * in Ford Eosport - 4237 * 1775 * 1662 mm
• Clien Nissan Cascai - 190 mm, Ford Eloctal - 200 mm

Price of all complete sets

Price Ford Eloctal from 900000 p. up to 1200000 p. Price Nissan Cascai from 1130000 p. up to 1722000 p.

Engine Ford EcoSport and Nissan Qashqai

For our country, Ford Eloctal is equipped with two power units: atmospheric gasoline engines, in-line 4-cylinder, 16 valve TRHC Timing with a distribution of fuel. Junior engine Ti - VCT 1.6 l. 122 "Horses", torque is 159 Newton per meter.

Senior engine 2-liter at 140 "horses", the torque of which falls on the meter 186. KPP - "Mechanics" and "Robot".

Nissan Qashqai is equipped with four cylinder turbo engine: 1.2 liters. 115 "Mare", overclocking is about 10.5 - 12.9 seconds. The speed of which will reach 194 km / h.

The next is the atmospheric engine 2 liters, 144 "mares", overclocking will be about 10 seconds, the speed with this engine reaches about 195 km / h.

Diesel unit - 1.6 liters of 130 "mares", overclocking - about 11 seconds. Speed \u200b\u200b182-183 km / h.

Trunk Ford Ecosport and Nissan Casca

Trunk Ford Ecosport is designed for 1238 liters. The trunk of Nissan Casca region is designed for 1585 liters.

Final conclusion

The result was very spectacular. Both new products are moderately, if compared with the last generation. Most characteristics have improved. In something one model, in something else better.