Test Polygon Subaru Forester or Mitsubishi Outlander. Subaru Forester or Mitsubishi Outlander: Comparison and what is better to take. Impressions driving

Technologies do not stand still, providing people with a comfortable and comfortable life. To date, there are many means of transport movement. Next, two popular crossover of Japanese origin will be considered. What are they like, what are their differences and what car is better to choose? Subaru Forester VS Mitsubishi Outlander!

Subaru Forester appeared on the market in 1997 and won the honorary title the founder of crossovers. Taking as the basis of the Impreza model, the car perfectly combines the features of an SUV and sedan, and also continues to delight fans with reliable and high-quality equipment, which is evidenced by sales indicators.

Subaru Forester is a very popular view in the United States of America: over the past five 5 years it has been sold there. more than half a million cars. During the period of existence, 5 generations were created. Subaru Forester remains almost unchanged from year to year. The design is improved, internal equipment, but no "fierce chips" is not entered. In this regard, manufacturers are very conservative.

As noted earlier, Forester is practical car. The capacity of the cabin will satisfy even the owners of a large family that lives not only in the city feature, but also for her. Thanks to the famous All Wheel Drive (AWD) and full drive, the car has high stability and permeability, ease of control and good overclocking dynamics. Symmetrical four-wheel drive Subaru provides the driver with a reliable grip with an expensive in any weather conditions. Light handling also provides the use of gasoline opposite engines, which have an effect directly on the center of gravity, reducing it.

Compared to the first generation, subsequent models began to have less aggressive appearance due to smooth lines of the body.

If you focus on the latest generation of Subaru Forester crossover, you can not see external changes: a new headlights, bumper and other parts. But technically changes were made: now this car holds on the SGP platform (Subaru Global Platform), which is created by the company for all new models.

Despite the fact that the dimensions of the vehicle remained the same as the fourth generation, due to the increase in the wheelbase, the places of the rear passengers became greater. Road clearance is also 220 km. Manufacturers paid a lot of attention to the engine, working on its economy and vibrationload, which is responsible for noise and shaking.

For the first time appeared on the market in 2001, under the other name - "Mitsubishi Airtrek", which expressed the main idea of \u200b\u200bthe Japanese crossover - pleasure and ease of driving. The first generation of this model lay Mitsubishi ASX. Renaming the model served as a change in the previous platform on GS.

Now the model had several power units, not only Mitsubishi, but also from Volkswagen and Citroen. Now the main goal that proceeded from the new name was to provide the client to the amenities to a long journey to the unknown lands. What means translated from English - Alien. So, the second generation Mitsubishi Outlander appeared on the market in 2005.

An interesting fact is that, despite the continuation of the production of the first generation under the old name, the release of the second generation began. However, buyers did not embarrass, and the model was actively in demand. Mitsubishi Outlander third generation on the market appeared in 2016. The back of the body, LED headlights, discs, steering wheel design, as well as decorative interior elements were modified.

All major modifications of the outlander are equipped with a full drive system, except for two versions with the front-wheel drive in the configuration of Inform and an invite with an engine in 2 liters. During the next update, the outlander received a number of structural improvements: an increased structural rigidity of the body, an updated suspension, an electric power steering, noise insulating glass.

Also additional equipment insulation are installed throughout the car. With a three-liter version of the Sport version, the crossover is equipped with the S-AWC S-AWC (Super All Wheel) system, which, thanks to a good clutch with an expensive, allows the driver to keep the car with the selected trajectory.

Similarities

For comparison, cars are taken last generations:

• Subaru Forester and Mitsubishi Outlander are crossovers from one price category.
• Have a permanent four-wheel drive.
• They accelerate to 200 km per hour, having the same dynamics of overclocking.
• Fuel type - gasoline.
• Transmission - variator.
• There are approximately similar dimensions with a capacity of 5 people, the number of doors (5).

Differences

1. SUBARU Forester The volume of the fuel tank is 48 liters, Mitsubishi Outlander - 60
2. The weight of Forester is 1640 kg, when the outlander has 1490 kg.
3. Have a different layout: Mitsubishi Outlander - transverse power unit, Subaru Forester - longitudinal power unit.
4. Forester has an opposite engine, outlander - inline.
5. The luggage compartment Subaru Forester is more than that of Mitsubishi Outlander.

Types of rear suspension: The Subaru Forester is a double-handed, Mitsubishi Outlander has a multi-dimensional.

What is better?

Comparable models of Japanese crossovers have both similar features and various. The choice of the car will depend on the driver's preferences to roads and riding. If the choice fell on off-road and natural trips, then preference should be given the Forestra for its downward transmission.

The outlander also combines light handling and smoothness, which will be a pleasant bonus in driving on urban tracks to any weather conditions. Also Forester has opposite power units, which affect the center of gravity and ensure its decline. The car has high stability and permeability, providing a safe driving driver and passengers.

Outlander, in turn, is suitable for urban ride: He copes perfectly on turns and with loose urban asphalt, accurately following a given trajectory. Such a mixture of an SUV with a passenger car will provide the driver a comfortable and economical trip around the city. In addition, the car engine works silently and smoothly.

Compact southety debuted in Europe in early 2003 and already in the spring appeared in Russia. The five-door wagon refers to the same segment that "Honda CR-V", "Toyota-RAV4"; "Subaru Forester". Russia is still sold only gasoline (2.0 l, 100 kW / 136 l.) Version of the machine only with a manual gearbox in Comfort and Sports. In November, the "automatic" and the 2.4 l engine, 105 kW / 142 liters will appear. from. Several later, an extreme "outlander" is also possible, 178 kW / 240 liters. from. (2.0 l with turbocharged). Depending on the configuration, the price of the car in the salons of official dealers ranges from $ 27,990 to 29,790.

Subaru Forester.

Appearing in 1998, in 2000 survived restyling, and in the summer of 2002, it was significantly updated. In the five-door universal, aggregates from "Subaru-Impreza" are widely used. Therefore, it is served as a consumer not only from the standpoint of universality, but also excellent riding properties. In the Russian market, Subaru Forester is represented with gasoline engines: atmospheric - 2.0 l, 92 kW / 125 liters. from. And with turbocharging - 130 kW / 177 liters. with. aggregated with a five-speed manual transmission or a four-stage "automatic". The configuration is very extensive as the price range: from $ 27,380 to 36,040.

Externally, they are so different, as if made in opposite ends of the Earth. One - emphasized the energetic and rude, frankly playing novelty, athleticity. The other, on the contrary, calm and friendly, has a roundness of forms and simplicity of style. It would seem where to make comparisons and analogies with such polar approaches of designers. Nevertheless, it is classmates comparable to the price and consumer orientation. In addition, they were released in one country - competitors, actively rival not only in the field of high technologies, but also on the roads of the rally championships. And yet the heroes of this test are far from professional sports, crazy velocities and overloads. Fucking the drive to all wheels, solid road clearance and energy-intensive suspensions, they acquired spacious transformable bodies designed to provide convenience, first of all, for family recreation and travel. So, a novelty of the Mitsubishi-Outlander season and a time-tested "Subaru-Forester". Cars, positioned not only as universal, but not devoid of driver attractiveness. Well, the more interesting there will be a comparison.

Rivalry or Optimum Search?

Before we start making interiors and evaluate the driving opportunities, let's look under cars, because their elements are not only the roads with a solid coating. Oddly enough, there are much more "ideological" similarities, rather than in appearance. Almost the same ground clearance, very close to the suspension, the schemes of the full drive with the viscous courses as blocking the inter-axis differentials, similar to the layout solutions of individual nodes and aggregates. Nevertheless, visually "Forester" is protected. Here the engine is closed with a powerful sheet, the exhaust system is "tightened" to the body tunnel, and the most vulnerable point is an element of the inspection frame - it is especially not afraid of contact with the soil.

All this Mitsubishi outlander contrasts only the steel "skiing" of the subframe, a slightly covering engine, and a long graduation system: it limits the geometric passability of the car. It is easy to assume that the consequences of its contact with the ground will be much painful.

Some generality is noticeable in salons. Similar four-speaking beans adjustable in height, seat adjustment handles, headlight control and wipers, heating and ventilation, glass windows, all this is done on the same plants, only under different orders numbers and with minor deviations in favor of developers. I do not hide, so honored Japanese traditions initially discourage, but rational grain in this is definitely present. So, replant from the car into the car, you can complain, for example, on the unusual frameless side windows at Subaru or note the alaepan combination of the instruments of Mitsubishi, but the fact that all the driving causes will be in familiar places is guaranteed.

"Standardized" and places for rear passengers. Comfortable sizes of openings, "correct" pillows and backs, space and thoughtfulness. There is nothing superfluous here, but at the same time it felt that the places are designed for full use on long journeys. Nevertheless, our opponents have not forgotten about the family features.

Mitsubishi Outlander is, first of all, the style and use of non-drying materials. You can not pay attention to the front panel design, the framing of the combination of instruments, skinned the steering wheel. There will be no unnoticed and embossed front seats profile, whose proportions and clear lateral fixation deserve only praise. A little touched the range of longitudinal adjustment - the tall people will senten his limitations. Otherwise, it is convenient for both the driver and passengers.

Subaru Forester looks democratic, and even more traditionally. Calm, without deliveries front panel, "Synthetic" Baranca, ceremony "in the rubber" upholstery. But do not rush with the conclusions. In the incomplete simplicity of the interior there is an almost complete set of electrical services, as well as cruise control and a huge hatch on the roof. Not sin to draw attention to the lever of the demultitator, which is next to the parking brake. This branded dish of mechanical transmissions "Subaru" expands the most active vehicles of the car. The seats here, although not so sophisticated by profile and configuration, but provide an indisputable advantage - a wonderful range of longitudinal adjustment.

Outdoor day

"Mitsubishi Outlender"Our acquaintance begins with an uncomplicated test route - a tricky working trip for the city. A great time, when everyone goes to meet you, pushed in traffic jams, and in our perspective fresh air, green lawns and ... of course, work.

"Outlander" is comfortable and friendly. It is worth a slightly pointed by a boring motor that seemed first, and the car easily flies on the motorway at a speed of 140-160 km / h. Despite the fact that the tachometer arrow has already exceeded 4000 rpm, it is quiet, comfortably and completely not felt. Relaxing, I even missed the braking a couple of times in braking and then I screwed it - no, of course, not myself, but a bright sun and the future to work on such a day.

In general, the car is peculiar, starting with the nature of the engine and ending with the smoothness of the stroke. The first one borrowed from Lancer, suddenly sinks the breadth of the revolutions. Starting "Go" from 1000-1200 rpm, it at the same time easily puts the tachometer arrow to the seven thousand mark and continues to "spin." But at the same time you do not perceive the engine as a sporty: on the contrary, its character is extremely smooth. Yes, and our car, as you understand, not small to "burn" from some 136 liters there. from.

Unusual Mitsubishi Outlander and otherwise: in front of his eyes the mighty hood line, and the dense energy-intensive suspensions repeat the profile of the road quite in detail. There is something in this from the older brother - "Pajero", inspiring permissiveness. True: It is worth it to appear more serious irregularities, as the suspension begins to swallowed the pounds and the Colds, and the seemingly muscular car suddenly seems to take off over obstacles. Of course, everything has a limit, but even on fairly broken roads, outlander keeps well done, not tiring the clawing of limiters and impulsive shake.

In management, it is clear and reliable. Of course, this is not a playful passenger car, ready to darken out of a number in a row, here, on the contrary, the weight of each rebuilding is felt, but at the same time the reaction of the car is pleasantly surprised by the logicality. Now a little complicate the task, inflaming the pace.

On direct Mitsubishi, outlander still keeps well, but in turns are not uncomplicated by the front axle, when the steering wheel is complemented sometimes and the back of the rear. Of course, such a style of ride is not quite suitable for a family ospercorn, but still it must be borne in mind that in some situations "revenge the tail" it can for quite a long time. The drive on all the wheels, of course, helps to catch the car, but she still does not like a panibrate.

"Subaru Forester.". After an underlined Ovsity" Outlander ", Subaru Forester is more perceived as a regular wagon: you sit below, and everything around everything is simple. But there is a characteristic sound of the opposite motor, then barely noticeable hum of all-wheel drive transmission, and the car is transformed - it is awesome. Character features. "Lesnik" is definitely noiser: in addition to the engine, aerodynamic missticks, hum of tires are well heard. And although they are not too pressured on the drummers, in this, perhaps, the most serious Loss "Outlander". Everything else is very balanced, and in the ride Plan "Forester" defends the position to the rarity confident.

Obviously, its engine does not have such a wide operating range of revolutions, but it is comfortable and trapped, and the close-bound transmission gives the car a pleasant superance. Of course, this car is heavy for a two-liter 125-strong motor, but thanks to the verified interrelations, it is felt only at a very intense rate of driving.

Subaru Forester always famous for a good smooth course. So now, in contrast to the dense, elastic "outlander," he is surprisingly gently damping the road trifle and small gentle waves. However, in this comfort, more than an ordinary car. With the increase in the speed of the "Subaru" noticeable the routine of the body, more amplitude of vertical movements. It turns out that one is more like a classic oscidence, hard, but impenetrable, the other inherited the comfort of a passenger car, and with it and some freedom of movement up-down.

Forestra is on hand in terms of manageability. He is not only a maneuvering fellow, but also rides otherwise. It is more accurately interconnected here, less delay and from this ride is somehow familiar and easier. In rapid turns, the car is much more active: it is sensitive to the steering steering and the gas pedal. At the entrance to the vigation, we also encountered slippage of the front axle, but the car struggles with them so intelligently, which does not allow any second to doubt the correctness of your actions, and most importantly, in the prosperous outcome of the experiment. In the meantime, the asphalt is replaced by a gravel coating, and then alternatively. But both "PARCATHER" are not "complex", trying to demonstrate all its technical potential.

Honestly, on bad roads, he is small, although both are capable of confidently moving even on the risks of the country. However, it is worth attack on something with a bulk (in our case, the photographer's so much photographer), as quite quickly come across a diagonal hanging; Begins to burn the clutch, and cars are surrendered. Alas, this is not their element. Even the "Forester" with its lower transmission, driving at first, soon retreats: there is not enough power, road lumen and elementary invulnerability inherent in real "passing". Looks like an active holiday day ended.

A MATTER OF TASTE

Oh, these Japanese - they know how to pose! At first glance, everything seemed simple and logical. One is a new and tearing into battle, the other - the already established, spent product. It would seem that the outcome of the struggle is obvious. Nothing like this! Perhaps, if it is pedantically put an assessment, then to carefully sum up, a small difference and will work out. Whose benefit? The answer is also controversy as the results of our measurements, where the dynamics are better from the "outlander", and the "maximum speed" is higher at the "Forester", or the braking path, which differs only half the meter - despite the fact that the newcomer is all disc brakes, and "Forester" rear drum. Even the prices are comparable: "Mitsubishi-Outlander" in the "Sport" configuration costs $ 29,790, and Subaru-Forester $ 31,280 is a little more expensive, and then at the expense of the hatch on the roof and cruise control.

Mitsubishi Outlander Pros and Cons:

• The trunk is small - to blame the developed output and full-size spare track;
• Two-liter 136-strong engine - basic equipment;
• For a complete set "Sport" are characterized by expensive upholstery materials, and the rim of the steering wheel is covered with the skin;
• White scrolls of the instrument panel enliven the dark background, but they look alapotato;
• Behind everything is thought out for convenience in long trips;
• Front seats with developed terrain, in the armrest - boxing for trifles.

Subaru Forester Pros and Cons:

• The trunk is the capacious and comfortable, and the engine is not angry, but the trap.
• The interior does not strike with stylistic research - however, kneading, you are arranged without comments and find everything you need for a long and comfortable existence.
• "Right" pillows and backs, space and thoughtfulness - quite a family interior.
• Demultiplier (his lever next to the handbrake) adds confidence on the calaes.
• Searches for distinguishing in the moves of the suspension - in fact they are almost the same.

So choose, it seems that you have to "heart", although someone from ours summed up like this: "If you need a car to comfortably carry myself a loved one, choose Mitsubishi outlander," well, I want to drive - look at Subaru Forester.

What will happen if simple rural guys send to a big city and put them in the company of intellectuals? That's right, after a while they will get together and acquired gentlemen manners - it happens not only in humans, but also in the automotive world. If we consider both Subaru Forester first generations, it can be noted that these machines are capable of overcome a very heavy crossed terrain. However, after we saw the second generation of Mitsubishi Outlander, initially produced with the console "XL", it became clear that the segment of compact SUVs gradually disappears, and the cars themselves are becoming closer to medium-sized crossovers. Is it time to wear a suit with a tie, sitting down in the Subaru Forester, or the car still remained comfortable utilitarian transport - we will find out, along the way, comparing it with a purely passenger Mitsubishi Outlander.

Mitsubishi Outlander and Subaru Forester - which car has retained more off-road qualities

Evaluation in dynamics

From the spot - on the off-road

It will be more interesting to know which of the car will show the best result on the crossed area - Forester or Outlander, so we will begin with comparison in this area. As mentioned above, in the past generation Mitsubishi Outlander became a crossover intended exclusively for movement. However, Mitsubishi engineers have slightly finalized a new car generation, providing it with other bumpers, increasing the ground clearance and remove from under a huge spare wheel, which was previously the cause of a significant reduction in passability. Alas, a miracle did not happen - everything spoils a very short suspension, which makes you hang the wheels on the irregularities of medium-sized dimensions. In addition, Mitsubishi Outlander does not even have an imitation of blocking intercoles differentials, which makes the car helplessly bounce, hitting a large womb on a dirt road or having bothering on a particularly large stone.

At all, the work of the new variator from Mitsubishi - the node works quite well in moderate modes, but it overheats even earlier than a multi-disc clutch that feeds the torque to the rear axle. Finally, it is not very flattering to respond about major fashionable bumpers Mitsubishi Outlsnder - although justice is worth saying that it has the same elements of the exterior design. Outlander suspension when moving along a flat surface provides very much due to its softness and optimal settings. However, it is worth only to go to Mitsubishi Outlander to conquer the expanses of domestic off-road and suburban roads, as softness immediately turns into a strong squabble, forcing the driver to slow down, and passengers - frantically grab all the protruding items.

If you compare Mitsubishi Outlander and Subaru Forester, at first glance, big differences are not observed. A similar multi-disc clutch of the friction type is used in the full drive system, although a conical differential is available for the version with the manual transmission that provides a constant torque supply. However, its settings are the best - unlike Mitsubishi, Subaru Forester is much less time to drop in the dirt before connecting the full drive, and also allows you to actively move around the area, without fearing the transmission overheating. Even the SUBARU variator surrenders much later - and it simply warns the driver, and does not switch to emergency mode with the load limit. In addition, the blocking of intercoles differentials in Subaru Forester imitates a special electronic system, in most cases facilitating overcoming.

However, other disadvantages are all the same - exclusively short-step suspension and too large bumpers that limit the magnitude of the corners of entry and the congress. It is worth noting the fact that the Subaru Forester even is not even equipped with the protection of the engine pallet, although it is in the basic Mitsubishi Outlander asset. If we talk about the Forester suspension, then in many modes it may seem harsh. But after going to a bad road, you understand that SUBARU engineers are not for nothing that these settings of the chassis were not in vain - the car would not seem to notice the pit, reliably protecting his passengers from shaking due to incredible energy intensity. In addition, the car does not lose controllability in such conditions - road irregularities are not transmitted to the steering wheel.

And if in the city?

If you make a major tested polygon, in comparison of the comforter or Outlander comfortability, the Mitsubishi crossover is undoubtedly wins. Its variator works more mildly, allowing almost imperceptibly to touch from the place without unnecessary jigs and sables to the soft suspension. The chassis itself also does not make itself felt in any case, except for very large irregularities - for example, tramways or "lying policemen", on which Mitsubishi Outlander jumps like a frightened horse, forcing passengers to experience some unpleasant moments. It is used only in winter or in very unsuitable for normal conditions. By the way, when approaching such urban obstacles, like high borders, Mitsubishi Outlander gives the driver an advantage that is expressed in the possibility of transmitting up to 100% torque both on the front and on the rear axle.

Subaru Forester Test Drive:

MITSUBISHI Motor with a volume of 2.4 liters gives the vehicle a good dynamics, although he does not make a sports car from it. Active, in which the fixed transmission numbers of the variator can be changed with steering switches, it seems quite superfluous - Outlander sufficiently confidently behaves and when using automation. The elements of the car is an even and unhurried urban ride, in which there is no place for lyccassies and indicative starts from the traffic light - for a large family crossover, which is Mitsubishi Outlander is a significant advantage.

If Mitsubishi Outlander and Subaru Forester, the second car shows itself completely on the other side. The car seems to make the driver actively touch off the place, leaving even enough powerful cars behind even enough. Of course, from the incredible stream of power that has been peculiar to the continuous generations, which combined with mechanical gearbox, was not traced, but the car still belongs to the number of the most dynamic city crossovers anyway. And here you already want to use the "virtual" fixed gears, which in Forester there are as many as 8. However, it is enough to simply select the automatic mode of operation of the SUBARU Forester transmission and try not too much to push the gas pedal.

Test drive car Mitsubishi Outlander:

The SUBARU suspension in the city sometimes seems inappropriate with a rigid - it makes passengers feel not only large irregularities, but also small road defects like cracks on asphalt and coating joints. Looking at it, involuntarily drag the speed in front of the tram paths - and absolutely in vain! After all, the SUBARU Forester suspension energy is fully revealed on medium speed, which allows you to almost not touch the brakes even on the streets with a very poor coating. However, Forester still tires - if the road is not perfect, you will have to get used to the constant shallow shaking.

Will you take away?

Another important quality for the modern crossover is practicality, which is expressed in the capacity of the trunk and the rear sofa. And here the Forester and Outlander compare will be more appropriate. Opening the back door, first wondered - where in Mitsubishi Outlander were so huge for the city crossover dimensions? The useful volume of the luggage compartment in Mitsubishi is equal to 480 liters, which is far from. In addition, wheel arches speak to the center of such square "couches", significantly deteriorating opportunities for loading large items. However, Mitsubishi Outlander can please us when transforming the cabin - when the rear sofa is lowered to the floor, the compartment capacity increases to almost 1.7 cubic meters with a flat floor.

Now we will move a little forward - immediately it becomes clear why Mitsubishi Outlander trunk with a fully disclosed sofa does not make us with a capacity. There is enough space for three passengers who will not feel shred, even if each of them is a professional weightlifter. Outlander is a lot of space both between the two rows of seats and the heads of the saddle. In addition, the landing is close to ideal - it is impossible to find a single explicit ergonomic miscalculation, although some may seem a little short pillow.

If you determine what is better - Forester or outlander, then when looking through the fifth door, it will seem more convenient and practical. The wheel arches in the trunk are not so great and have a rounded shape that allows you to release a little space for loading equipment that is used in a long road. However, when transformation of the salon, the SUBARU Forester trunk increases with 500 liters to 1.55 cubic meters, which is significantly less than that of Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, annoyance causes the step formed on the floor, which prevents shipping inward large flat items.

Yes, and with a spacker on the back row, everything is not so good - the passengers are freely posted in the Subaru Forester in width, but they feel some lack of space in length and height. But to their services - a chic armrest, in the lower level of which there are large cup holders, allowing not only bottles of 0.5 liters and cups with coffee, but also larger vessels, for example, from McDonalds. The Subaru Forester also has no problems with the convenience of planting on the back sofa, although the closest spoils the sensations somewhat.

Design competition

Salon

Mitsubishi stylists have applied the original solution by paving around the center console, the dashboard and the left deflector chrome-plated frame and filling out the free space inside with a lacquered plastic. However, in general, if you compare Forester and Outlander, the latter will give way to its competitor produced by Subaru. Mitsubishi Outlander uses only hard plastic spoken by unpleasant humor sound at the slightest impact on it. In addition, it does not cause any enthusiasm or the steering wheel with large spokes, decorated with the same cheap plastic, nor the space under the center console Outlander, in which only the selector of the mode of operation of the PPC is distinguished.

However, there is in simplicity and its advantages - and pollution is not so clearly visible on a gray background. In addition, Mitsubishi Outlander devices perfectly read in many respects precisely because of their simplicity - when looking at them, you do not spend the fraction of a second of precious time, so important with the rapid change in the road situation. The chairs have an optimal form, although some again will seem short pillow, and others complain about the overwhelmed side support of Outlander. A fairly interesting feature of Mitsubishi Outlander is the use of deep capacitance in the front armrest - it is possible to put not only small things like a memory card for the multimedia system, but also a thermos and dry paja to the entire company traveling to a picnic.

Salon Subaru Forester looks much better, although very ambiguous. The materials used are very good, but the appearance of the front panel imposes thoughts about the late 90s - it allows you to distract only the large screen of the multimedia system and under the visor, although they look like alien here. This is what immediately attracts attention to the Subaru Forester - so it is beautiful devices in which each of the two dials bordered by a chromed frame. The steering wheel of Forester with relatively thin knitting needles looks interesting.

Appearance

After the last restyling, Mitsubishi Outlander began to look more freight - largely due to a very narrow radiator grille and a tiny brand logo. The situation aggravates and strongly outstanding the bumper Outlander with a large slot in it. However, there is one original detail in front of the front, which visually facilitates it, making the appearance of Mitsubishi Outlander as a whole, more harmonious and balanced - it is large curved submarines, rising from the bottom of the bumper. Mitsubishi designers used a large stamped line passing along the entire length of the sides - it gives the appearance of the crossover more dynamic. The back also looks good - that's just light lights contrast too much with the Body of Mitsubishi Outlander when choosing a dark color.

If you compare the outlander against Forester, the car from Subaru will be much more harmonious despite some disproportion caused by greater height and increased clearance. The front of the Subaru Forester looks like a truly aggressive due to a large bumper with undercuts, as well as two slots in the center separated by a powerful plastic crossing. An even greater aggressiveness of the Forester gives headlights that taper to the center of a small "step". When looking at the side of the Subaru Forester seems somewhat heavy due to the bloated wheel arches and the straight line of glazing. But behind the back view is very harmonious - there are attractive headlamps in it and a strongly protruding bumper.

Gentleman manners?

Of course, with a change in generations, both Subaru Forester and Mitsubishi Outlander have become more comfortable - however, it was necessary to sacrifice. Of course, Subaru allows you to move around the crossed area more confidently, but it is sooner or later surrendered. But Mitsubishi Outlander wins the capacity, although inferior to the competitor on the dynamics and style of the interior design.

Subaru Forester.

2.5 L, 171 hp, Variator, Trend Sport

1 590 000 rub.

Mitsubishi Outlander.

2.0 l, 145 hp, variator, intyle

1 269 990 rub.

TULA REGION. Russian chernozem

"All past night was raining the wall, almost a monthly rate of precipitation fell out," the leading local radio reported at that moment when we turned from the asphalt towards the "estate" of one of the colleagues. He immediately had a hunger: he knew how everything could end, "but we did not say a word. Apparently, feared that we, frightened difficulties, turn back.

In the meantime, we ripen on a flat grader, admire the expanses. Freshly skilled fields are alarmed with huge puddles. Everyone knows: on the rascal chernozem riding awesome. Sun blends - you look, in the evening everything will get dry. But we have no time to wait!

The colleague gives a signal - turning off the stabilization system, we turn into a spacious rut. Deep! "Outlander" often scrolls the bottom on the ground, but "Forester" is not seen. The cars are chirped from side to the side, spreading around the joy of mud, but they go. The wheels are both started in the slip - the toothy tires would be preferable. And these, purely road vehicles are instantly closed, and now Mitsubishi has become a prisoner of the chernozem bog. We wear boots, planted. Yeah, sat on the belly. From the transmission of 4 × 4 transmission to the constant full drive mode, any sense. It makes no sense to twitch in the "back-back" mode. We were drunk - and pushed together together. Even the help of "Subaru" was not needed.

Again on the road. Kiela Feels: The "Outlander" variator works at the limit. Quick, click on the accelerator, and the engine turnover is almost not growing, it is not enough to dry again. And after all, stuck, "it was necessary to go through the foot by the move, but Mitsubishi did not have time to gain sufficient speed. This time it did not work on our own - I had to pull the Forester. Once, and ready!

Such a feeling that "Subaru" is generally not necessary - rushing forward like a tractor! It goes easily, with a margin, like a slightly spacious primer under the wheels. The most interesting thing is that its variator in deep dirt will not pass - it properly transfers to the wheels and allows you to linearly, without delay, accelerate. Even after forty minutes, he was not tired of such a ride, continued to act with the previous effectiveness. Excellent aggregate! Its amazing performance is explained, apparently, the refusal of the clinoremable transmission (from Mitsubishi is that such) in favor of the clin-tag, which is better to carry the load. Believe me, on the off-road it is how it feels.

The colleague is encouraged: now, they say, we will rise in a slide, and there to serve before the cottage. It is easy to say, because he is on the Forester, and my "Outlander" in the middle of the slope rose and then refused to go. Rock back. After a decent overclocking, the height still took - and I see how "Subaru" rolls down. Good to him: There is an electronic assistant descent from the mountain. "Mitsubishi" does not have such such; However, we can brake and we ourselves.

But the main obstacle ahead. River, usually width of a meter of one and a half and a depth of ankle, overnight bloomed, - you will have to forcing. The first went "Forester." Raised the wave before the bumper, and she easily tear off the number. Well, in time noticed. With the next "outlander" - it happens! - exactly at the same place there was the same body.

While the rooms were looking for, water was leaked to the salon, and she arrived quickly. MiG got to the shore, and here the long-awaited cottage. Dare! We put the "Forester" nose down so that everything left the drain holes in the body. Well, they themselves accelerated the learning process. While they were dragging, the car buzzed and the cruck with all its nodes and aggregates, as the dissatisfied dog, whom they brought to walk in bad weather. Three minutes later, extraneous noises sthoted, the ether was filled with a much more pleasant twitter of birds. For this, it was worth biting.

Five hours earlier. Dmitrovsky polygon

Crossovers most of the time spend on land, so let them fan on the asphalt polygon. From the very first meters behind the wheel of Forester, it is felt: it is sharpened to active ride. A harsh suspension regularly broadcasts each crack of the coating into the cabin. At the same time, the energy intensity of the chassis is impressive: bring the case to breakdown, it seems impossible. At high speed, the car becomes more comfortable, as if he boots over asphalt plexuses. Nothing knocks her on the way - Monolith! Just the case when more moves - less holes. The steering settings also pleased: sensitive, informative, with instant responses. Even at speeds well for the hundred "Subaru" remains under full control. And the motor is enough. Whole car.

"Outlander" showed completely other habits. Its suspension perfectly isolate the interior from road trifles, but on irregularities more larger than the Forester. Boots are transmitted to the beam. The steering wheel is very light, the feedback is lacking, and there is no "zero" as a class. In the running turns of "Mitsubishi" is not so tight as "Subaru", which is why they are moving into the steering wheel. It is better not to hurry - with the "Outlander's unhurried ride like more than with active. Moreover, that the duo of the noisy on high speeds of a 2-liter motor and the variator does not have to stick. To quit the car, constantly rubbed the submissive petals. I think in a month or other exploitation would polish them to shine.

On the eve of the day. MOSCOW

So it happened that with the new "outlander" I had never had dealing to deal, so I consider his salon with predilection. After the sacred interior of the predecessor, he looks more interesting, there is something to catch a glance. It looks great like a central console suspended in the air, a little deployed to the driver. Good devices with color display in the middle. Praise visibility. The quality of plastic is not bad, but the leatherette on the door panels looks too cheap. There is not enough attention to trifles: bottom trays and niches are not rubberized, buttons-keys are made rude, the handbrake is located from the passenger side, there is no case for glasses. But pleased the space in the second row - you can jump on my leg! And the floor tunnel is small. It is a pity, the doors are unpacked by Neshiroko - it's inconvenient to sit down.

Sitting to "Outlander", you immediately understand that it is cheaper than "Forester": the finish is inexpensive. Yes, and in other nuances feels savings.

At the new "Forester", I also did not go before, but I look at the interior without much interest. After all, he is exactly the same as a well-known crossover "Subaru-XV". Everything is familiar: cool seats, a grip steering wheel, spectacular instruments, arrows of which, after turning on the ignition, as in sports cars, are taken to the extreme position and returned back. Review, truth, worse than in Outlander.

And all the same in the "Forester" sloe salon, it is more comfortable - it is felt that this is a more expensive car. He has better finishing materials, the "music" sounds richer ("Harman Cardon", by the way). Not left unnoticed and such an element of luxury as the electric drive of the trunk door. The trunk itself, however, is not so spacious, like Mitsubishi. And on the back sofa place less. But you can not be about tightness and speech.

After testing. Editorial

Expanding the estimates after the test, caught herself to think that about Mitsubishi and to remember something particularly nothing. Did not leave the "outlander" of a trace in my soul, a private car. Spacious, comfortable, but no more. But "Forester" caused much more emotions: bright, dynamic, with good patency. A trip for a long time is not forgotten (especially in Tula dirty!). But the fooling of the fusion has not passed the gift - burned, hiding water, an audio amplifier, hidden under the front chair. Good was "music," - it's a pity, played for a short time. But even this moment did not spoil the overall impression. One memories of "Forester" will be more!

To off-row ready?

Measuring the road clearance "Subaru":

it was pretty surprised - 225 mm! Not every sacrifice has such, not to mention crossovers. And in the back of the "Forester" we measured even more - 235 mm. Given the non-religious ramps and a serious corner of the ramp, the geometric passability of the Lesnika should be recognized as excellent. It is a pity that the Japanese limited to this and did not protect the engine compartment with a metal plate. But in general, the bottom is smooth, without protruding elements.

The manufacturer should be digest and for the front towing eyes: too narrow to get to them are inconvenient:

At Mitsubishi, tug-in eyes liked both in form and location:

Road clearance of Outlander is much smaller, but its 200 mm is still a good result for the crossover. Moreover, on the metal protection of the motor compartment, the manufacturer did not save:

Front and rear skes are more than that of Forester. Geometric permeability worsens the reserve under the bottom - her mount clung to the ground all the time, her grass was stuck there.

Such different CVTs

The endurance of the variatorists was checked on the high-speed ring of the landfill, which were driving at maximum speed. After 10 km from Mitsubishi, the problems began: the transmission is complaints about, the engine turns fell, and the proposal was highlighted in the instrument panel (photo 1).

The effect is striking: traveling ahead of the passenger car from the strip, it seemed to blown the wind. However, if you watched the film "Alexander Nevsky" and remember the "expression of the face" of the German knight in the helmet of the XIII century, they will quickly understand what it is about. Imagine that you saw in the rearview mirror approximately the same thing, but only the size of all rear windows ...

Teutonic, sorry, "physiognomy" Mitsubishi Outlander, as it is impossible to go to the Russian translation of his name - Alien. And if there is a 2-liter gasoline engine under the hood, a 2-liter gasoline engine (well, it's not to remember the CR-V!), Then I'm a "forester" (that is, Subaru Forester) with a manual transmission will hardly be almost an ideal analog for Comparisons with "Alien". It is not enough that the appointment, dimensions, the volume of the motor, the base equipment and its price, but also the actuator diagram is the same: both are permanent on all wheels with a symmetrical inter-axis differential, blockable viscous. Unlike most competitors who have a thorough magic device that connects the rear wheels when slipping the front.

Both cars went to us with a rather rich equipment. Outlander - in the Sport configuration for $ 29790, implying in addition to two other two side airbags, climate control, roof rails, some additional small decor inside and outside, as well as cast 16-inch wheels with tires 215/65 R 16. Subaru Forester is about the same, but also plus the radio tape recorder, cruise control and a huge hatch in the roof, and the wheels are not 16-, and 15-inch. But also cast, with tires 205/70 R 15. If he had more additional headlights in the bumper, it would have turned out to be "maximum" VR equipment worth $ 31490.

And now - an important point. When we arrived to pick Outlander, they found it not provided for by the specification, but very beautiful 17-inch Duemila wheels with completely high-speed tires Pirelli P6000 225/50 Zr 17. And it is impossible not to recognize that later these wheels had a certain influence on our estimates.

Internal thoughts
It is unlikely that someone may doubt that outwardly Forester is not so expressive as Outlander. On the other hand, not everyone recognizes the expressiveness of the "alien" adequate to his image. However, if you consider the main function of the appearance of the Status Quo pointing machine among neighbors in a stream, then by purchasing Outlander, you definitely do not lose.

It's more difficult with the inside - it exists in it, and there is something to think about. Do you like the fashionable minimalism "Alien", or do you prefer the classic style of the design of "forester"? Do you think a solid black pad "under the tree" on the hard plastic of the Mitsubishi panel or is it more expensive to look more like a soft pad and console "under Titan" Subaru? There are quite objective things. For example, it should be noted that Forester allows you to easily settle down with a long-legged driver, while Outlander provides more space for feet sitting from behind. And also several "salon" and "luggage" observations that you will find in the signatures to the corresponding illustrations.
The Outlander's Moscow ring road met the stormy reactions to rounded ruts, flowed with studded tires in the asphalt of the extreme left strip. However, this is the normal behavior of the car, wound into a wide low-profile "rubber", and we did not make any special conclusions from this. Unless urgently wanted to write an article about the feasibility of using spikes in the city.

It seems that Mitsubishi MitSubishi has come new times. No traditional "pickup" in the area of \u200b\u200b3500-4000 rpm You will not detect - the characteristic "depicted" is surprising. The engine confidently "pulls" already with small revolutions, follows absolutely uniform overclocking in the entire range, up to the most "tops". And the fact that the "Alien" motor retains the ability to accelerate the massive body of it and after 6000 rpm, heavily cuts off under overtaking.

The blocking clarity of movements of the gear shift lever contributes to intensive acceleration, but it's not worth it too: the lever will begin to "rest." With the help of ancient, as a car world, it is easy to make sure that this non-historicalness is on the conscience of synchronizers, which means to force the switching speed clearly should not. To avoid…

Subaru Forester is much more willing "takes" overclocking on medium - yes so that the acceleration is felt by all body. But it is inferior at the highest (after 5500 rpm) and clearly loses on the smallest: your wish "crawling at idle" (for example, in the road traffic jam) drives it into a fitful trembling, belonging only by adding revolutions or using the clutch pedal. However, you can use the downstream.

After Mitsubishi, the gear shift lever seems to be vaguely speaking, but do not draw conclusions on this only the first impression. For by the ability to quickly switch, this box is quite worthy of well-known three-letter combinations, most often used in conjunction with the SUBARU brand (meaning WRC, WRX, STI. - Ed.).

At the highest speeds, it is noticeable that the Motor "Alien" is more powerful - above 160 km / h "Lesnik" is not gaining so zeal. However, this is not the most practical observation - on multibone highways often reduce the speed, and on other roads, normal people do not go so fast.

But the essence of the car is in the wheel
Although these cars could, and without much voltage. It is necessary to pay tribute: the resistance of the motion in both is excellent, regardless of the quality of the road linen. Unless, of course, do not consider the described reactions of wide-profile tires on the stelted ruts and other screw tricks of our road profile. However, after 120 km / h and stop noticing them. A different kind of irregularity and Outlander, and Forester "swallow" is completely indifferent - and not only at high speeds. And the turns are "writing" - as a circle on paper.