Everything about Mitsubishi Lancer motor 5. Mitsubishi Lancer X sedan. Characteristics of cars with various power plants

Gasoline engine Mitsubishi Lancer is 10 1.5 liters. With a capacity of 109 hp Frankly weak for the machine that provokes to active ride. The 4A91 series Motor itself is clearly not sharpened. Therefore, 1.5 liter gasoline atmospheric on Mitsubishi Lancer X long does not live and often needs to be repaired. The main problem is already through 100 thousand runs, it is an ors of oil caused by climbing piston rings. Today we will talk about all the design features of this engine. The engine is forced to the limit, the designers of it squeezed everything that can, so it does not live for a long time.

Mitsubishi Lancer engine device 10 1.5 liters.

MITSUBISHI 4A91 engine, it is an inline 4 cylinder 16 valve unit with an aluminum cylinder block and timing chain drive. This is a typical DOHC with the upper arrangement of two camshafts. On the intake switchgear there is a phase resistant (executive part of the gas distribution phase change system). The MIVEC gas timing phase control system, works in combination with distributed electronic fuel injection ECI-MULTI.

The head of the engine block Lancer is 10 1.5 liters.

GBC Mitsubishi Lancer x 1.5 Litra is made of aluminum alloy. The camshafts directly affect the valve. That is, the cams are filed on the glasses, which in turn are put on the rods of the valves. There is no risk there. But also in this motor there are no hydrocomathers. The valve gap is regulated by the selection of pusher glasses (31 size), which have different bottom thickness. Candle wells are located in the center of the GBC.

Driver motor Mitsubishi engine Lancer 10 1.5 liters.

The drive timing chain and usually does not cause problems. All labels for installing a new chain are available. But experienced masters make their own additional tags. It is not possible that on the same shaft there is a phase student, which works due to oil pressure which is regulated by the MIVEC electromagnetic valve. The resource of the chain is not known for certain, because against the background of the planned oil-challenged caps, smeared piston wheels and wild zhora oil, it is not at all the problem of the motor. Timing diagram on Mitsubishi Lancer 10 1.5 Next.

Engine characteristics Lancer 10 1.5 liters.

• Working volume - 1499 cm3
• Number of cylinders - 4
• Number of valves - 16
• Cylinder diameter - 75 mm
• Piston stroke - 84.8 mm
• Timing Timing Chain (DOHC)
• Power hp (kW) - 109 (80) at 6000 vol. in min.
• Torque - 145 nm at 4000 vol. in min.
• Maximum speed - 178 km / h
• Acceleration until the first hundred - 14.3 seconds
• Fuel type - gasoline AI-95
• Fuel consumption in the city - 8.9 liters
• Fuel consumption in a mixed cycle - 7 liters
• Fuel consumption on the highway - 6 liters

This motor is weak for Lancer, for the Mitsubishi Colt, the engine is suitable, as it is not better. Before buying a used Mitsubishi Lancer x 1.5, think how much you can repair the power unit.

Lancer X appeared in 2007 and is well sold to this day. His appearance, made to taste to many motorists, resembles a fighter. Despite the interesting exterior, the car has also other useful qualities that make the car popular even in the secondary market.

The body of the "tenth" lancer does not differ from superplication, because the metal is used quite thin. The paintwork also does not differ in strength, so it is very often possible to meet scratches and chip cars. Even pebbles on the road can slightly damage the rear arches, especially since the anti-gravine coating is often spacked on the lancers.

But for those who decided to buy in the secondary market and is going to examine the body in search of rust, it is worth starting from the trunk, it is there most often it is formed, because condensate accumulates in the luggage compartment, and the water is seeping through the area of \u200b\u200bthe rear lights in small quantities .

Lancers Over time, the front headlights fill up, on the fog lights, the mirrored elements will be burned out, and the bulbs on the rear headlights are often exhausted, so they will have to be replaced, but during the replacement it is necessary to be careful not to break the corner of the light filter.

Salon "Tenth" Lancer

Inside the car uses hard plastic, which can overreach with time. As regards the chairs, they use a fabric that is almost not worn, but armrests on the doors and between the armchairs are rubbed.

In Lancer, a very simple electrical equipment is used, but despite the simplicity after a few years (3-5) a motor of the stove fan can be held, if it is replaced, then buying a new one will cost about $ 90. It is better to make a replacement before the onset of cold weather, because in the winter there is a high probability that it will fail.

It also happens that on some copies, climates control, drives, adjustable mirrors over time.

On many lancers x after 80-100 thousand mileage kilometers, especially in the city, begin to refuse the steering buttons to correct the problem - you will have to replace the wiring rings on the steering block, they cost about 30 dollars.

Engine on Lancer

As for the engines, there are several different options here. The most problem is considered a gasoline engine with a volume of 1.5 liters 4a91, a lot of cars with such a motor - about 30%. After 100 thousand kilometers of the mileage in the city, this motor begins to eat oil - about 5 liters per 10,000 km, due to the fact that the piston rings were stuck. To eliminate such a problem, you will have to spend about 120 dollars on new rings.

But if you follow the car, especially after it drove 60000 km, check the oil level cut. If suddenly it is noted that the oil decreases, then without delay it is necessary to bite the rings in the composition for the roundment.

As for other motors, such as the 1.6-liter 4A92 and the most common - 1.8-liter 4B10 and 2 liter 4B11, then they do not consume oil.

In general, on the "tenth" Lancer reliable motors, they calmly withstand 300,000 mileage kilometers, and if the engine does not kill, the motor and 500 thousand will be able to roll back.

IN engines Lancer X. The system of changing the MIVEC gas distribution phases is used, which is reliable and does not fail, there is also a chain in the timing chain, which is not needed for a very long time.

There are some weak points in these engines - a fairly weak throttle block, it has a flap to be clogged, so it must be cleaned every 40-50 thousand km. A new such unit will cost approximately $ 400. Next, after passing 60-70 thousand km. It is worth seeing how the drive is the drive of the hinged units, it is important to monitor not only behind the belt, and also behind the rollers.

As a rule, after passing 120-150 thousand km. May leak the front crankshaft gland. It should be changed, the price of it is within 30 dollars. In addition, failures in the ignition system may occur due to ignition coils. Over time, these coils should also be changed, and they cost about 150 American rubles. And if we consider cars that were issued until 2010, then these machines found condensate on the oxygen sensor.

There are also situations when the tight ring between the graduation system and the collector is destroyed due to its unreliability, then the car begins to make sounds similar to diesel rusty. Such an annular seal is not expensive - about 10 dollars.

Also in the "tenth" Lancer is considered to be the engine of the heater, the benefit that it is not difficult to change, as it is under the glove compartment.

Appearance and what spoils it

If you look closely, it can be seen how the leashes of janitors are seated. Among other unpleasant moments, the protective film is lagging behind the doorway, also the film from the rear arches is already dugs almost immediately.

And thanks to the machine, scratches may easily appear on the machine, which, of course, the appearance of the machine can easily appear on the machine.

Boxes gear

Lancers with a 1.6 liter engine are equipped with a 4-speed Jatco automatic machine F4A series, which has a rich history - it was created by another 90s, the design is quite simple, so it is distinguished by reliability, if you change the oil in the box times 90000 km This automaton will drive at least 300,000 km.
With regards to 5-speed mechanics, which is installed on the Lancers with a 1.5-liter engine (GetRag F5M), there are some problems here.

First, the clutch will have to change several times, the clutch kit will cost about $ 60. It is also known that the bearings of the primary shaft and the release bearing are weak, many owners of Lancers changed them still under warranty, because they are caravan.

But the mechanical 5-speed AISIN F5M is more durable, but after 100,000 km can sometimes eat. In winter, all mechanical boxes that are installed on Lancers are becoming more tight, because the lubricant from frosts thickens, so that riding even in winter is more comfortable, you just need to use frost-resistant lubricant.

There are also a complete set with the Jatco JF011E variator, which showed itself from the best side, it was designed in 2005 and was used on models of such brands as Mitsubishi, Nissan, Suzuki, Renault, and even American Jeep and Dodge. Of course, sometimes selector gives failures and happens that the gearbox modes are not switched due to poor contact.

Also, when driving on the variator, it is important to remember that the variator box does not tolerate the sharp blocking of the wheels when the wheels during parking are stuck in the brow, for example. During a sharp locking of the wheels, this situation occurs: scratches appear on the pulleys due to the belt checked, the pulleys themselves begin to deform the belt, after which the variator begins to buck.

Such a stepless gearbox will be repaired at all cheaply - about $ 2,000, plus it is still necessary to add the cost of the belt, bearings, shkivof, and there are cases that they have to change the gears of the planetary transfer and even the oil pump. How to determine whether to do the repair of the box - if jerks or slip will appear, then it's time to scatter.

And on the other hand, if we relate to the box carefully, do not tear it and do not overheat, follow the cleanliness, as well as change special, not cheap (20 dollars per liter) DIA QUEEN CVT-J1 oil with a frequency of 70,000 km., Then the variator The box will last for a very long time - no less than a machine can work - about 250,000 km.

And even, even if it is very rare, but there are lancers with a 4WD all-wheel drive transmission, there is an electronic control and a coupling that connects the rear drive. The same system is used on outlanders, it is famous for reliability and does not create special problems.

Suspension on the "tenth" Lancer

The suspension on the design is the same as on the "ninth" Lancer - in front - the rack McPherson, and the back of the multi-dimension is a fairly strong chassis, but you should not ride a serious mud. So that the suspension lasts longer, we must try to ride more or less clean roads. If you ride in sand and salt, then after some time there will be a rack, and stabilizer bushings, and even springs. Because, rubber supports between the bottom turns and the supporting glasses are wiping.

Also do not like dirt and bearings of the slip of the front racks, when turning the steering wheel, they will produce either a creaking, or crunch, and it will be changed to cost - $ 50 for each support.
As for the front racks, their price is 200 dollars apiece. There were such launched cases when these racks did not depart over 20,000 km. But in cars that were released after 2011, the racks became more long-playing - almost 3 times longer began to serve.

The developers did not stand still and in the Lancers released in 2014 on shock absorbers installed anthers who seriously began to protect the rod and gland from dirt. Also, in new cars have become more abrupt rear bearings on the hubs.

Steering

The steering mechanism at the same time was not distinguished on the better - here the electric power steering is installed here, and the hydraulicel is installed in all other lancers.

In the first lancers, after 500,000 km appeared knocks from steering tag and rail. It is good that this problem as a rule appeared on warranty, so the entire expensive node was changed in dealership service centers, because, in those times it was impossible to buy these details separately. In the other lancers, there are no complaints to the steering mechanism, even steering tips and traction are perfectly withstanding about 100,000 km. Run.

Brake system

In the brake system there are only 2 features - after about 60 thousand kilometers can ring the caliper brackets on a bad expensive, to correct this situation will need to spend about 45 dollars per set.

In the early models of Lancers, the developers made miscalculations in terms of heat resistance. In general, brake discs will calmly solve about 100,000 km. Mileage, with a calm ride, but if you drive a car in an aggressive style, then the discs can go with a screw. Therefore, more qualitative disks can be installed for lovers of a quick and sular ride.

In general, Lancer is a fairly reliable car, so there are some minor problems, but they can always be easily eliminated. Lancers, equipped with a 1.5 liter motor to 1.5 liters, but the remaining modifications of lancers can be safely acquired.

Good day. In today's article, I will tell about the weak points of Mitsubishi Lancer 10 ( Mitsubishi. Lancer X). We agree on the shore - the article is written by a dealer, the author has no longer experience in operating period 10 Lancer, but the ninth Lancer he owned more than 2 years.

Mitsubishi Lancer X debuted back in 2007, and since then the world has developed a huge number of Japanese cars, which now with enviable regularity are found in the used vehicles. The "tenth" lancer x and now looks quite pretty. And that is why Lancer X with mileage without difficulty find new owners. He plays a Japanese car and its high reliability. However, the Mitsubishi Lancer x 10 cannot be called very trouble-free operation.

Body problems and LCP.

The Lancer X body metal is quite thin, but even on the oldest versions of the Japanese car spots rust you will not see. Is that in the area of \u200b\u200bthe trunk can be discovered several "spiders". All due to the fact that moisture enters the trunk through the rear lights loosely adjacent seals.

Well, the classic of the genre - Thresholds:

But the paintwork of the Lancer X body cover could be more resistant to external influence. Almost all cars are full of small scratches and chips. Another minus is a soft plastic of the front headlights. Over time, he is furious, which makes the Lancer x a little cold. Fortunately, if you wish and return them to the former transparency.
Inside Mitsubishi Lancer X will not inspire. The Salon of the Japanese car is made of frankly cheap hard plastic, which in time begins to a freshly creak. When buying a car, pay attention to the condition of the armrests. The fabric on them is quickly rubbed, so that according to her state, you can indirectly judge the real mileage of the car.

Weak electrical equipment Lancer 10.

Electrical equipment Mitsubishi Lancer X as a whole works without comments. Only after 5-6 years of operation can be checked quite expensive motor fan motor. On some cars, there were problems with electrical heating seats and a mechanism for folding rearview mirrors. The benefit that they did not receive mass distribution.

Engine reliability.

Of all the engines that were installed on a Japanese car, the most unsuccessful will have to recognize the gasoline power unit with a volume of 1.5 liters. The main problem of this power unit is to block the piston rings, which leads to increased consumption of engine oil. So after 60 thousand kilometers of mileage, Mitsubishi Lancer X owners will have to periodically monitor the oil level.

The remaining engines offered for Lancer X are not affected by oil glitter. And if possible, it is better to stop their choice on them. An ideal option for a Japanese car can be considered a 1.8 liter gasoline engine. With competent maintenance, he calmly maintains 250-300 thousand kilometers. Approximately the same resource also has a two-liter gasoline power unit. The undoubted plus of these engines is the fact that in their gas distribution mechanism, a chain is used, which years does not require attention.

Although no small problems do not do in this case. Delicate throttle block will have to clean every 30-40 thousand kilometers. After a run of 50-70 thousand kilometers, it is still more and more often to pay attention to the state of the belt of mounted units. And to change in the case of which not only it will have, but also videos. To run 100-150 thousand kilometers on Lancer X, as a rule, the front seal of the crankshaft begins to hilt.

Weak places in the transmission.

The GETRAG F5M transmission mechanical transmission box, which is paired with a 1.5-liter engine, has proven itself not too well. Many owners complained that the clutch in the box had to be changed after 40-50 thousand kilometers. The bearings of the primary shaft were not too survivable. AISIN gearbox manual, which was installed on the Lancer X version with two other gasoline engines, much more reliable. Although in it after a run 100 thousand kilometers of transmission, it is started to switch with a little effort. Frequently often on Mitsubishi Lancer X can be found and. He does not deliver special problems. Only occasionally the owners complain that the variator does not switch the transmission modes. This happens because of the poor contact of the selector. However, it is important to understand that the repair of the variator in the case of which it will cost more such on the "mechanics". So before buying a car with a variator, it is better to spend thorough diagnosis of this node. And already during operation, try not to overheat the transmission and periodically check the purity of its radiator. In addition, every 70-80 thousand in the variator will have to change quite expensive oil. If you follow all these advice, the stepless transmission may be able to withstand from 250-300 thousand kilometers. The same resource has a four-step "automatic" JATCO, which was installed on Mitsubishi Lancer X with a 1.6 liter gasoline engine.

Suspension reliability.

The suspension of the Japanese car is reliable. But to extend the service life, try to periodically clean it from sand and salt. It is precisely because of them prematurely begins to creak the racks and bushings of the stabilizer. Before restyling, the most complaints of the owners of the Lancer X collected the front, which in some cars were withstanding only 30-40 thousand kilometers. After updating the car, this problem was solved. Rack resource increased several times. The same situation and with hub bearings. On cars from the first parties, they endured only 60-80 thousand kilometers, but after a couple of years their resource became noticeably higher.

Steering problems.

The reliability of the steering of the Japanese car will have to talk with a light-up to this engine, which is installed under the hood. On vehicles with a basic semi-liter engine in a steering control instead of "hydraulics", an electrical inspector was installed. It is on these versions that the steering rail and thrust could begin to knock after 40-50 thousand kilometers of the mileage. However, owners of used cars fear of particularly nothing. Most of the problems managed to appear in the warranty period, so almost all cars expensive node was replaced by warranty.

About brakes.

In the brake system of the Japanese car, the most complaints enters the caliper guide brackets, which begin annoying brushing after 40-60 thousand kilometers. Otherwise, no problem should be. The interval of the replacement of disks and pads in the Lancer x is no different from that on car-competitors.

Outcome.

Mitsubishi Lancer X has weak points, but in fact they are not so much. Most classmates of the Japanese car unpleasant surprises present much more often, so buying Lancer X can be safely. But from the basic versions with a 1.5 liter engine, it is better to refuse, preferred by cars with more powerful power units with a volume of 1.8 and 2 liters.

In conclusion, I propose to see this video:

I have everything today. If you have something to supplement the article about the weak points of Mitsubishi Lancer 10 - Write a comment ...

The car exceeded the most courageous expectations. Bought at the end of 2008 (model 2009). Now mileage 47000 km. Nothing cracks, it does not rattle, does not knock. Changed only consumables (filters and oil) and gasoline filled. And that's it. The car is very reliable and unpretentious. In any frosts start the first time (I always fill benz 95th). The suspension is soft (I do not know where you are tough there). Qualitative sound of a regular radio and acoustics (SD + 6 speakers) Even the base for the configuration will wet the nose to all competitors (no one from the competitors is so unfarshed). Very successful ergonomics (probably the most successful of all cars). Everything is just in those places where you expect. The engine is very frisky - I do not see the dynamics of differences from more powerful - grabs with your head - in two years I only got drowned (on BMW). Very sharp steering wheel and very precise control. Very reliable suspension (all native and for two years on any roads not a single smey). Successful engine, consumption on the highway at 100-120 kmh total 5, 1-5, 5 l, in the city depending on the situation - from 6 to 8, but more than 8 liters have never been. Two years old - and still constantly in admiration for reliability and convenience (behind the wheel it is you getting pleasure from driving). If time to turn and now buy a car again - I would buy my Lancer X.

Board buyer: Buy of course. But to be determined by itself, and not blindly enter the advice. Sitting in the salon and you will be visible "at home" or "visiting")

1 9 years

Overclocking up to hundreds of Mitsyki 14.3 !!! I have Corolla 1.6 for 10.5 seconds accelerated!

Serega 9 years

he has a mechanic, there, too, 10.5 to one hundred

Igor 9 years

I also have a 1.5 transmissions on those. Characteristics acceleration to hundreds - 11.6 seconds. And to be honest, it is probably much longer, my dynamics of my Lance does not suit, here 1.8 I liked it!

EVSEY. 9 years

Or cute, or on a run-up, threatened the machine read at least a well-known test drive "Clear Karaul". "Well, the first thing that is felt when moving from the spot the increased love of the motor to turnover. Attempts to move at idle cars do not like categorically. According to the passport, acceleration to hundreds should take 11.6 s. Based on the subjective sensations, the declared indicator corresponds to reality. " (c) I have a wonderful clothing and impressions exactly the same (and the flow rate of 5.1-5.4 on the highway and 6.5 in the city is also simple).

Dima 9 years

On the mechanics of Metic from 1.5 DV. According to the passport, it should accelerate to hundreds not for 10.5 and for 11.6 seconds. And in fact (we measured the stopwatch) acceleration to one hundred and 13.7 s., The typewriter is very cool. So it is not even ridiculous to say that only once once it is not even funny, Mitsky with dv.1.5 l. Distribution and Lacetti with dv.1.6 l. (also tested on races), because In the stopwatch, Lacetti acted to hundreds for 11.2 sec. For your words I answer, if you do not believe, check yourself!

EVSEY. 9 years

11.6 This is a passport. Tried on their own - it turned out 10.8. (According to the passport and consumption on the track 5.4, and 5.1-5,2 is really often. In the pastectut - then the values \u200b\u200bare averaged) but it was, once the BMW really got drowned .. (

EVSEY. 9 years

"Overclocking up to hundreds amounted to - 13.7 s.," Wow)) I can only imagine how the typewriter was running ... It's a pity that they threatened ... (

Egor 9 years

Overclocking up to hundreds of Mitsa - 11.6 seconds, but this is at all Mitsuhah 1.5 In addition to Eusen, he has a special price and overclocking to hundreds for 10.8 seconds! And no one has managed to overtake his super-lancer in two years, well, so it's not read once, when this is all the same way a bumeer managed! Do not mix people!

Igor 9 years

The guys do not need to say anything, 1.5 is just 1.5 and it is clear that the engine of this volume is weak for Lancer with its mass! And naturally, any other machine with a larger engine easily drags the Lancer with 1.5 engine! This is the law of physics, you will not argue with him!

EVSEY. 9 years

You might think if there was a 4-liter engine in Lance with a capacity of 60 horses - such trepachi would be satisfactory ..) Not a volume, but power. And 109 horses for the mass of Lance are the perfect ratio. For its mass, the difference between 1.5 and 2.0 invisible (who tried - everyone just listened to the enviousness and not knowing why they also believed that 1.5 little). It turns out for the Corolla 1.3 enough)) for Opel 1.4 enough, but for Lance 1.5 little?))) It is necessary to think before repeating the enviousness .. In addition, the engine is 1.5 kdeuff. Elasticity is higher than 2.0, so 1.5 is also more durable and reliable. Also, the laws of physics - they will not argue with them ..) Once again, we are convinced that negative feedback only from those who have no idea about the subject of the conversation, but only either "heard ..", or "read ..". You need to think before the air shakes what you have no idea ..)

EVSEY. 9 years

Those who think with stereotypes that 2.0 for some reason should be better, "I recommend to ask why Lansa 2.0 in 2010 was removed from the release. Japs are not a fool, and the bet was set for 1.5. (Dvig 1.5 is more reliable and durable than 2.0 - it is enough to calculate its cruefficients to see the obvious)

777 9 years

This lance with 2.0 stopped producing, and outlenders from 2.0 as they produced and continue to release !!! By the way, they have the design of the panel is absolutely the same, only on Lance from oak rigid plastic, and on an outlander from a good dear soft plastic!

EVSEY. 9 years

Yes! 2.0 normally fits just for the outout, and for Lans -1.5. Exactly!! I'm after reading 2 years ago reviews of those who saw the Lance salon only in the pictures, but hardly believed that the type of Lance plastic and the outout was different - carefully examined the salons of both cars carefully. I did not find any differences. Plastic in Lance satisfies me, because after the VAZ classic (where, as everyone else, the plastic is soft) I was looking for a car with a normal plastic, and not soft, and that I didn't remember under my finger (on the Zhigules it had already gotten :-)). I have no complaints about the plastic of Lance - it is such a car that dreamed of - reliable, high-quality, dynamic, pleasant in management and pleasant to find in the cabin, the quality of the salon and the overall ergonomics. When buying (2 years ago), the cars of pieces 15, Lans turned out to be ideal for aspirations. As a result, after all previous checks, 4 competitor remained - Lancer, Astra, Octavia 5 and Passat. Won the Lancer in all respects and the price was cheaper. It is pleasantly doubly) for some reason, even those who have not seen Lans in the eyes - it's hard to criticize three things Lance - the size of the trunk, the quality of plastic and the quality of Shumkov (this is despite the fact that the competitors have all the same, just for it so happened - It is accepted to criticize only Lans))) two of my friends, as soon as I chose, also knew that the plastic should be criticized, and criticized the first: "there plastic oak, solid" second: "There is a soft, mild," :-))) less Listen should frequency, but watch yourself)

zhorik 9 years

The higher the volume the greater the engine test. The lathers are better because the accuracy of the processing of parts from Japanese machines is the best in the world. And your ratings leave.

EVSEY. 9 years

I wonder how people are in one dilapidated car and conclusion for the whole class. My two years and almost 50 thousand - nothing knocks, not cracking, does not creak and not grimit and everything is still native. It turns out, you just dangle ..

EVSEY. 9 years

In general, I am of course amazing half of the population. Most of the machine in the eyes did not see, but still claim what they read from the enviousness .. I really liked the phrase read once and objectively displays the reality - "who could not take Lancer X - it is just just from despair to be unrealized about him" . Lance - Machine - how it is properly written in all tests - exclusively reliable. For two years - not a single smey and all native. Inflatable - I would simply just sit in the salon and immediately become clear - you're "houses" or "visiting." And in terms of reliability, Lance will not let down, you can not doubt.

Ilya 9 years

... "But in general, I'm certainly amazed half of the population. Most typewriter did not see the machine, but still claim what they read from the enviousness" ... just did not see the Lancer, this is such a rarity !!!

Ivan. 9 years

The engine is very frisky - I do not see the dynamics of differences from more powerful - grabs with your head - in two years I only got drowned (on BMW). That's what you wrapped the tops. You yourself think that you write, here not only you need to laugh and getting wound from such stupid statements, let's still have something else to complete us!

Avangard 9 years

According to Evsee, "1.5 Lans" is a straight sports car, and no one can overtake him, one once managed to be a BMW, really kindergarten!

Alexander Vitevich 9 years

Guys stop arguing with Essaym. After all, it is quite obvious that the Lancer of this young man is his first new foreign car, and naturally, that does not own the experience of ownership of other machines (he simply does not know how comfortable, quieter and softer) -laster for him is still the ideal. It will come and he will already evaluate the machine objectively, and not at the level of emotions! And Japanese engines for him are the best, because Forgi, he simply did not exploit and naturally no difference knows. Over time, he will change the car (after all, it will not ride a century on it), and if the German hinds, then everything will understand himself!

Evgeny 9 years

I also had the Germans and Americans (now a cumein). Neither who will not take anyone else (unless new and no more than two years). In terms of reliability, dynamics and manageability with the Japanese, do not compare.

Stas. 9 years

The Germans and Americans are the sky and the Earth, it is first, and in the second no one says that the Japanese are not reliable, so I wanted to buy a new Lancer X, and I liked it! But you understand that after a quiet and smooth Ford Mondeo, I can not ride in a noisy Lancer, and it is very good that I tried it in person and now I know the difference. And in terms of reliability, and on dynamics, and by manageability, and by comfort, the Ford Mondeo released in Germany is very suitable, but there are already 237 thousand km mileage, although nothing broke, but it's time to change the car and only For a new one!

Evgeny 9 years

Mondeo original machine. Detached - to say so. After the Mondeo, I think it is hardly worth considering the Japanese - they are completely unlikely (by comfort and quality of the cabin, but on dynamics and manageability with the Japanese, do not compare - the Japanese is better controlled. But the goals and purpose of the cars are different). (After the Mondeo, I only stopped on Kruzka). But Mondeo Vile is very. Not dynamic (yes, like all the few Americans visible. There are no "light" in control - aggression). Look at Skoda?

Stas. 9 years

No Skoda is not hunting (it's like yesterday's day). Super meant to test - Drive of the new Opel-Astra!

Evgeny 9 years

Then look insignia? All the same, the top of the creation of Opel. Astra is somehow small. Lancer burned, and you go to the Astra, although Astra by definition is worse in general any Japanese in the classroom. And in Chevrolet not watched? (Cruz and, in particular, epic) at their price look good (I don't know about the quality, but I like the epic)

Stas. 9 years

Eugene, something I don't fall asleep, worried, I'm afraid to disappoint again as in Lancer and in general, after him, I don't want to try the Japanese. Opel-insignia I do not pull in money, Cruise and Epika do not want because of the Russian assembly, and Opel-Astra is a perfect new model of 2010, sales began, and the assembly is Germany. Well, okay tomorrow at 9 am her trial and accept the solution.

Alexander Vitalyevich 9 years

Dear Eugene, do not need to chop from the shoulder when assessing cars and the manufacturer's country does not happen here, turn my experience. I have 51 years old and I had a lot of cars for my life, I will list them in chronological order: Moskvich-2140, VAZ-21023, Opel-Omega, Ford Festiva, Volvo-460, Grand Cherokee, Opel-Astra, Ford Mondeo , VW-Passat, Mitsubishi-Lancer (sold recently), Audi-A6. Now I will list in descending order of the machine that I liked more (taking into account the driving quality, reliability and comfort, but not considering Audi-A6, because I have only 1 month. And give an assessment yet early), domestic auto industry I do not take: 1.Grand-Cherokee; 2.VW-Passat; 3.Volvo-460; 4.Ford-Mondeo; 5.Omega; 6.After-Astra; 7.Mitsubishi-Lancer and in the last place of the Ford Festival. But here the conversation goes about Lancer, so let me express your opinion about her. The car is quite reliable, for almost 2 years I only had to replace the front racks, the case was recognized as warranty, because they had a defect in the racks, but in comfort and it was greatly served in its assessment, she did not suit me (did additional noise insulation), after operation The above cars could not get used to the noise in the cabin, only the Ford Festival was no more. That's all. Good luck on the roads!

Evgeny 9 years

Mondeo, Omega and Volvo - an excellent choice in the Passat I do not like the handling - too stupid and vile. It is sharpened only for comfort - no drive and dynamics.

Arnold 9 years

Yes, you never never went to the Passat! Drive and dynamics are incomparably better than Lancer 1.5, while also the comfort is excellent! Evgeny, you're just a lie!

Sergey 9 years

Lancer with the Passat and compare nothing, Lancer in the deaf Nakata! And in all positions - on dynamics, speed, comfort, interior design, interior decoration materials, equipment and smoothness! But for a good car and you should pay more expensive, and Lancer for today's price is one of the worst options among class C, because His classmates and cheaper and more comfortable and for reliability he will not be treated!

Sergey 9 years

1.5 MKP 2007G.V. 30000 Mileage, the only thing that changed-Liberty is Sv.Na Xenon 50W (White) and alloy wheels, the more profitable began to differ from the fellow in love to Mitsu. For 3 years, only positive emotions: a design, amazing dynamics, especially for those who find out what volume of DV., Confident driving both in urban mode and on the track, I consider the Lancer x a big luck of Yapavtoprom. The manual on the traffic light twice played by opening the Skoda window watched which The volume and was extremely surprised, saying-fire. Symemu: Excellent car at a time price. P.S. It is possible to make a pacification, but not a fact, because you can, removing the noise, give rise to the creak. And I wish you a safe driving and mutual respect on the road, remembating that the lights of the distant and accident can be able to convey much.

Mitsubishi Lancer is a compact car of Mitsubishi, and one of the most popular models of the Japanese brand. Lancer has an extensive story, because at the moment ten generations of Lancer has already been released. The first generation appeared on the market back in 1973. The model is sold worldwide, but had different names - Chrysler Lancer, Eagle Summit, Galan Fortis, Mitsubishi Mirage and others. Toyota Corolla, Citroen C4, Peugeot 408, Honda Civic and other car C-class can be considered competitors. Since 2007, the Lancer of the 10th generation is manufactured, as well as its charged eVolution modification.

Navigation

Mitsubishi Lancer engines. The official rate of fuel consumption per 100 km.

Generation 7 (1995-2000)

Petrol:

• 1.3, 88 liters. s., Mechanics / Machine, front
• 1.3, 75 liters. s., Mechanics, front, 12.5 seconds to 100 km / h, 9.2 / 5.5 l per 100 km
• 1.3, 75 liters. s., automatic, front, 15.8 seconds to 100 km / h, 10.6 / 6.5 l per 100 km
• 1.5, 94 liters. p., automatic / mechanics, front
• 1.5, 110 liters. C., Mechanics / Machine, front / full
• 1.6, 175 liters. s., Mechanics / Machine, front
• 1.8, 135 liters. s., automatic, front
• 1.8, 125 liters. s., Mechanics / Machine, front
• 1.8, 205 liters. s., Mechanics / automatic, front / full, 11.9 seconds to 100 km / h

Generation 9 (2000-2005)

Petrol:

Restyling generation 9 (2005-2010)

Petrol:

• 1.3, 82 liters. s., Mechanics / automatic, front, 13.7 seconds to 100 km / h, 8.5 / 5.3 l per 100 km
• 1.5, 91 liters. C., Variator / Mechanics, Front / Full
• 1.5, 100 liters. C., Variator / Mechanics, Front / Full
• 1.6, 98 liters. s., Mechanics / automatic, front, 8.8 / 5.5 - 10.3 / 6.4 l per 100 km, 11.8-13.6 seconds to 100 km / h
• 1.8, 114 liters. s., Variator, front
• 1.8, 130 liters. s., Variator, full / front
• 1.8, 165 liters. s., automatic, front
• 2.0, 120 liters. s., Mechanics / Machine, front
• 2,0, 135 liters. s., Mechanics / Variator, front, 9.6 seconds to 100 km / h, 11.7 / 6.5 l per 100 km
• 2,0, 135 liters. s., automatic, front, 12 seconds to 100 km / h, 12.6 / 6.9 liters per 100 km
• 2.4, 162 liters. s., Mechanics / automatic, front, 10.7 / 8.4 l per 100 km

Generation 10 (2007-2010)

Petrol:

• 1.5, 109 liters. C .. Mechanics, front, 11.6 seconds to 100 km / h, 8.2 / 5.4 liters per 100 km
• 1.5, 109 liters. p., automatic, front, 14.3 seconds to 100 km / h, 8.9 / 6 l per 100 km
• 1.6, 117 liters. s., automatic, front, 14 seconds to 100 km / h, 9.1 / 5.8 l per 100 km
• 1.8, 143 liters. s., Variator, front, 11.2 seconds to 100 km / h, 10.9 / 6.2 liters per 100 km
• 1.8, 143 liters. s., Mechanics, front, 9.8 seconds to 100 km / h, 10.4 / 6.1 l per 100 km
• 2,0, 150 liters. s., Variator, full, 11.4 seconds to 100 km / h, 12.1 / 6.8 l per 100 km
• 2,0, 150 liters. s., Mechanics, full, 9.8 seconds to 100 km / h, 11.2 / 6.9 liters per 100 km
• 2.4, 168 liters. s., Mechanics, front, 11.2 / 8.4 l per 100 km

Diesel:

• 2.0, 140 liters. p., Mechanics / Variator, front, 9.6 seconds to 100 km / h, 8.2 / 4.9 l per 100 km

Restyling generation 10 (2011-2015)

Petrol:

• 1.6, 117 liters. s., Mechanics, front, 10.8 seconds to 100 km / h, 7.8 / 5 l per 100 km
• 1.8, 140 liters. s., Variator, front, 11.4 seconds to 100 km / h, 10.8 / 6.1 liters per 100 km

Second restyling generation 10 (2015-N.V.)

Petrol:

• 2.0, 148 liters. s., Mechanics, front, 9.8 / 6.9 liters per 100 km
• 2.0, 148 liters. s., Variator, front, 8.7 / 6.7 liters per 100 km
• 2.4, 168 liters. s., Mechanics, front, 10.7 / 7.6 l per 100 km
• 2.4, 168 liters. s., Variator, front, 9.8 / 7.6 liters per 100 km
• 2.4, 168 liters. s., Variator, full, 10.2 / 7.6 l per 100 km

Mitsubishi Lancer Owners Reviews

Generation 7.

• Anatoly, Ekaterinoslavl, 1.3 88 l. from. Lancer is a good and reliable car, arranges at 100%. Of course, the car is not new - 1998 release, with a mileage of 120 thousand km. Very comfortable and compact car for the city, family and work. In the cabin there is enough of the place, with comfort, two adult passengers will place comfort. The volume of the trunk also looks not flexible at the level of competitors. In principle, everything suits, well, except that the suspension is a bit tough on our roads. With the engine 1.3 and the mechanical gearbox laid at 7-8 liters per 100 km.
• Konstantin, Moscow region, 1.5 94 liters. from. Wheelbarrow What I need for my needs, I do not care if I needed a good and reliable transport for every day, let it even be supported. Lancer is optimal in terms of value and quality ratio. I have a 94-strong version, consumes within 8-9 liters with a mechanical checkpoint.
• Oleg, Nizhny Novgorod, 1.6 175 liters. from. Found Mitsubishi Lancer 7th generation with a turbocharged motor. Excellent acceleration indicators, the first hundred is recruited for 7-8 seconds. An old lancer was pleasantly surprised me, and also the engine saves on gasoline. In the urban cycle, I put a maximum of 12 liters, 8-9 liters per hundred turns out.
• Karina, Simferopol, 1.8 125 liters. from. Cool machine, suits me for most parameters. Gasoline consumption per 100 km is about 10 liters, pour 92th gasoline.
• Dmitry, Stavropol Territory, 1.3,75 liters. from. I am satisfied with the car, I got Lancer from my father. By the way, he bought it in the early 2000s on the secondary. At that time, a bunch of autoham was delivered to the country, but it was possible to choose an instance in good condition. Lancer is one of them, with current mileage of 177 thousand km. Car service independently, with repair no problems. Average cost of 7-8 liters / 100 km. I fill the 92nd gasoline.

Generation 8.

• Alexey, Vorkuta, 1.5. I use Lancer so far. A simple and unpretentious car for the city, reliable and practically not breaking. The suspension is rigid, but it is rather in plus. The car is quite suitable, just for my needs - gives pleasure every day. Well managed and slows down, and reliability is still at a high level. Unfortunately, with practicality, Lancer is not very. Not the most surround trunk, and close salon, especially from behind. I have a 1.5-liter version with a manual box. Machine 2003 release, bought in a new state. Middle gasoline consumption per 100 km - 8-9 liters, pour 92th gasoline.
• Alexey, Nizhny Novgorod, 1.8. The 2004 car, unpretentious in operation, is ideal for traveling for every day. At first, my father traveled on it, I trained me driving and proudly handed me Lancer. Thus, Mitsubishi Lancer has become my first car. Consumes up to 10 liters per 100 km.
• Dmitry, Irkutsk, 1.5. I have a rather rare instance of Mitsubishi Lancer. Machine of the eighth generation, with a full drive and 1.5-liter motor. Cars have excellent geometric permeability. There would be more clearance, it would be a real SUV. Simple and reliable design, in the cabin nothing superfluous - all levers work, like electronic systems. Japanese engineers tried to fame, big respect them. Lancer consumes 10-11 liters per 100 km. Probably, not very low consumption is associated with a full drive.
• Pavel, Kaliningrad, 2.0. I am satisfied with the machine, Mitsubishi Lancer since I have been released since 2005, equipped with front-wheel drive and mechanical checkpoint. Consumes an average of 9-11 liters per hundred. I go and do not complain, very comfortable and reliable. I don't see the meaning of buying a dozen, I am quite satisfied with the eight.
• Nadezhda, Yaroslavl, 1.5. My all-wheel drive Mitsubishi Lancer drove 100 thousand km, for 13 years of operation no serious breakdowns. The car in general likes. Although I recognize that the model is already outdated, and you need to do something with it. After all, otherwise then sell will be more difficult. Lancer with a 1.5-liter motor consumes 8-9 l 92th gasoline per hundred.
• Konstantin, Moscow region, 2.0. I have a Lancer 2005 release, at the moment Mileage is 110 thousand km. I go comfortably, my customers are satisfied. The ideal option for a taxi is reliable and unpretentious. Good speaker, two-liter motor drags with a bang. Consumes an average of 11 liters per 100 km. The engine works with a manual box, which fully reveals the potential two-liter. By the way, ICE supports 92th gasoline. Well, at least, I fill and do not complain.
• Julia, Magnitogorsk, 1.5. Lancer I got from my husband, and he himself moved to a new Toyota Corolla. The car is used only for trips around the city, consumes 8-9 liters per 100 km, it works properly, only dealers are serviced.
• Denis, Nikolaev, 2.0. Lancer stands for his money, bought 120 thousand km on the secondary with mileage. Version with a two-liter motor, overclocking up to hundreds in 10 seconds. Excellent dynamics, decent handling and brakes. The salon is welcome, praise high quality assembly and materials. Everything is simple, and tastefully. Put the audio system for 12 speakers, plus two subwoofers in the trunk. Working DJ, and Lancer with Lancer, as it were, complement each other. Lancer with Motor 2.0 consumes 10 liters per 100 km.

Generation 9.

With engine 1.3.

• Konstantin, Peter. Lancer serves me faithfully, bought it in 2005. Good and reliable workhorse, the optimal option for work in a taxi. Time proven design, good fitness to Russian climatic conditions. But for the sake of justice, I note a rigid suspension that is not suitable for broken roads. But but the Lancer is practically not cubed. For a taxi, I had enough version with a 1.3-liter engine that supports 92th gasoline. Middle fuel consumption at 7-8 liters per hundred.
• Alexander, Lipetsk. Mitsubishi Lancer is the optimal option from the point of view of family and other needs. In a word, a universal car, and I don't care how much years she was bought in 2017 an instance of 12 years ago, with a mileage of 98 thousand km. Nothing breaks, does not creak. There are only original spare parts. 1.3-liter motor consumes 7-9 liters per hundred.
• Oleg, Stavropol Territory. I am satisfied with the machine, I have 2006, with a mileage of 163 thousand km. A good and unpretentious car consumes from 7 to 8 liters per 100 km, under the hood 1.3-liter 82-silyne motor.
• Dmitry, Orenburg. A cool car, a car, what is needed - for family, work, rims on nature and other picnics. The car sets up on a dynamic ride - the chassis setting is simply great. Alas, its potential is not capable of revealing a 1.3-liter motor. Saved what is called, chose the Dishman package itself. I regret, of course, although I did not really want to overpay. At 1.3-liter, most importantly, this is fuel efficiency at 8 liters per hundred in the urban cycle.

With engine 1.6 transmissions

• Oleg, Irkutsk. Cool machine, personally, I like in all respects. For example, Lancer has an excellent review and behavior on the road, a hard suspension, a very powerful 1.6-liter motor, a clear MCP. Consumption from 7 to 10 liters depending on the nature of driving.
• Leonid, Bryansk. I have Mitsubishi Lancer 2006, drove 120 thousand km. During this time, the sedan never failed in a long road. Serviced in the dealer center, the benefit of the repair roads relative to inexpensive. In addition, I will note cheap spare parts, as a last resort, you can look after the disassembly. The choice of spare parts for Lancer is just a huge - even more than for the tenth Lancer. In 2006, I bought a version with a 1.6-liter engine - the most chassis at that time. Decent dynamics, excellent brakes and handling. In the urban cycle, the car consumes 9 liters per 100 km.
• Mikhail, Ekaterinoslavl. I have a 2005 Lancer, is actively used in the family and in economic affairs. I confess immediately, I bought a car because of design and good manageability. The car does not attract the sight of others, looks sports and restrained. I was pleased with a simple communal salon with perfect ergonomics, a regular magnetic and efficient air conditioning. 1.6-liter version with mechanics consumes 9 liters per 100 km.
• Yaroslav, Tambov. Cool car, perfect for my needs. We work in a taxi, and at the same time I still have time to deliver courier delivery. In general, the final working day I have 15-16 hours. Most of this time I spend driving. Sit comfortably and spacious, dynamics and handling - at altitude. I recommend Lancer to everyone, you will not regret. Version with Motor 1.6 and mechanics consumes 8-9 liters.
• Margarita, Taganrog. I am satisfied with the car, I have a 2004 Lancer release, I bought it on a secondary in March 2017. Over a month and a half, the sedan never broke, although he is not young. The total mileage is now 110 thousand, normal flight. 1.6-liter motor with mechanics consumes no more than 10 liters with energetic driving.
• Konstantin, St. Petersburg. A decent car, optimal in terms of capacity, reliability and Japanese quality ratios. Lancer is my first supported foreign car, bought in 2015. Before that, I went to Peugeot 107. Lancer is more spacious (by itself), it is better controlled and slows down. And most importantly, I finally began to respect me on the roads! 1.6-liter motor works with mechanics and consumes 8-10 liters / 100 km.
• Igor, Saratov. Lancer is a good car tested. Satisfies the needs - both my and my wife. It rulits well, and at the same time very practical in everyday use. Motor 1.6 with MCP consumes up to 10 liters per hundred.
• Konstantin, Minsk. I liked the car, I still go on it, I carry out in a taxi. A powerful 1.6-liter motor accelerates the lancer until the first hundred for 10 seconds, the mechanical box discloses the potential of the engine. In general, the speaker is impressive, the maximum speed of 200 km / h is not a problem. On the track you can put in 7-8 liters. A very spacious interior for four, and the interior itself is made in a sports style. Good quality assembly and fitting details, not to do something. I am sure that Lancer will serve me another 50-70 thousand m, I do not see sense to sell.

With engine 1.6 automatic transmission

• Svetlana, Irkutsk. I am satisfied with the car, I have an option with a 1.6-liter 90-strong engine. It is enough for me. In addition, the 4-speed automatic will praise - although it is becoming old, but it works flawlessly and gives up a motor in full program. As a last resort, there is an opportunity to transport the box to manual mode, and then will be at all. In general, the girl is dynamic, seeing extrovert, and we are complemented by Lancer. The machine consumes up to 10-11 liters per 100 km.
• Vladislav, Stavropol Territory. The car was purchased in 2005 with a 1.6-liter engine. Surprised smooth and fast work of a 4-speed automaton, and in general, the car is perceived from a good side, configures on a quick ride. Consumes up to 10 liters per 100 km.
• Mikhail, Leningrad region. The car that needs, satisfies all my driver needs is a great overview, good dynamics on the track, sharp and clear reactions to the rugg, moderately rigid suspension and smooth operation of the machine. 1.6-liter engine eats up to 11 liters.
• Alexey, Bryansk. I am satisfied with the car, I have a release version 2006, the current mileage under the crawler. Mitsubishi Lancer I was pleasantly impressed, still in excellent condition. From the nodes and aggregates did not change anything, well, except only consumables. Consumption at the level of 10 liters with engine 1.6 and automatic transmission.
• Konstantin, Moscow region. I got Lancer in supported state - version of 2006, with an archaic machine gun with a 1.6-liter engine. Initially, it consumed on average 10 liters per hundred, it is quite suitable. Salon is not the most spacious in class, but I have no family, so I will not find fault. I bought purely under your needs, I go comfortably. Very satisfied. Put the bodies, spoiler, new seats with and improved noise insulation. The dynamics improved a little, overclocking until hundreds now in 10 seconds, and this is with an old automaton! The flow remained the same.
• Anatoly, Lipetsk. Lancer fully suits me, it is very reliable and economical in the city and on long journeys. Fuel consumption 10-11 liters. Under the hood 1.6-liter motor working with a machine gun.

With engine 2.0.

• Alexander, Sverdlovsk. My Mitsubishi Lancer drove 160 thousand km, during this time there are no special breakdowns. The secret of the reliability of my car is timely service, and only in brand service using original spare parts. No handicraft methods and other collective farms, this is not a Vaza Shaha. I have a two-liter version with a machine gun, a powerful and dynamic machine for the city and sprint on traffic lights. Consumes 10-12 liters depending on the nature of the ride.
• Boris, Sakhalin region. I liked the car, Huge Respect Lancer for great overclocking and handling. Two-liter motor and mechanic - excellent tandem, my sedan is still quite able to give odds to more modern competitors. Acceleration to hundreds for 10 seconds, maximum speed 220 km / h. The average consumption is only 10 liters.
• Elizabeth, Yekaterinburg. A wonderful car for the city and long-distance travel, a workhorse what needs. I am with Lancer for more than 5 years in a taxi, customers are satisfied. With Motor 2.0 and the automaton put in 11 liters per 100 km.
• Alexey, Almaty. My lancer with a two-liter engine drove 170 thousand km, and at the time did not break through the major one. Consumes 10-11 liters, pour 95th gasoline.
• Maxim, St. Petersburg. Lancer since 2007. He has a simple and unpretentious design studied to holes. The design of the model, of course, no emotion is no longer caused, from now on, the car is associated with the classical sedans of the beginning of the 2000s, which are easy to tuning. But I have a fully original machine, with a factory 2-liter engine. He is definitely not needed tuning, since the engine confidently drags from all revolutions - reveals himself both in the low and red tachometer zone. Consumes from 10 to 12 liters per 100 km.

Generation 10.

With engine 1.5.

• Konstantin, Moscow. Bought in 2007 Lancer with a 1.5-liter engine. Basic equipment, in stock Only mechanics and air conditioning, and essentially nothing. I decided to save, but then I found a lot of flaws in this version. With reliability, everything is fine, here only overclocking behavior on the road - not impressive. 100-strong motor, unfortunately, is not enough for on the easiest machine. In addition, Lancer does not matter with aerodynamics. Lancer Noisy, the gearbox works well, but this is not enough. It makes no sense to turn the engine to the red zone, because of this, the flow rate can increase. For example, I go mainly on medium turnover, laid in 10 liters in the city.
• Dmitry, Nizhny Novgorod region. I don't praise Lancer for me. I made a purchase in 2007, I was very waiting for this car. But then disappointed, traveled half a year and exchanged for a more powerful version with a motor 2.0. 1.5-Litrovik - at all, and he drove too much gasoline - no less than 10 liters per hundred.
• Maxim, Ekaterinoslavl. I did not like the car. Well, nothing hooked, and that's it. Sold in two years of use. The cabin is very noisy on high speeds, circle of vibration, rigid and rattling suspension. Consumption in the city of 10 liters.
• Mikhail, Orenburg. The car did not suit me alone from the claimed parameters. I will never reach marketing anymore and low. 1.5-Litrovik - that is still a vegetable, it is not worthy for a good car. Because of the sluggish dynamics, it is necessary to turn to the red zone, and then the flow rate increases to 11 l / 100 km. Sold in a year of use.
• Alexey, St. Petersburg. Put the Lancer assessment below average. But despite the weak 1.5-liter motor, the car came out quite successful. Yes, there is discomfort. Yes, tough and rattling suspension, noises in the cabin, vibrations in a circle, etc. But the high reliability of the car outweighs all flaws. For 170 thousand mileage, not a single serious breakage, I'm not going to sell.
• Irina, Ekaterinoslavl. Good and reliable car for every day. Sat down and went what is called. 1.5-liter motor tunes to a quiet ride, I have enough of it. Consumption of 10 liters.
• Margarita, Arkhangelsk. Cool machine, reliable and economical. I have a basic 1.5-liter version with mechanics, consumes 9-10 liters.
• Natalia, Ryazan. I liked the car, inexpensive and practical in operation, equipped with a 1.5-liter motor with MCP. In the city, I am laid in 10 liters, outside the city - 8 liters.
• Oleg, Krasnoyarsk. Mitsubishi Lancer since 2007, for ten years drove 150 thousand km. The car is reliable, the Japanese technology of the highest quality. In this regard, I can put the five with a plus. Otherwise - a complete failure, I did not expect a notable car straight. Nice steering wheel, a circle of vibration in the cabin and too much noise. 1.5-liter engine does not make sense to twist up to high revolutions. But I somehow got up, all the same for me the main thing is reliability. Average consumption of 8-10 liters.
• Oleg, Nizhny Novgorod. Acquired a lancer with a 1.5-liter engine and mechanical gearbox. The car is not for a quick ride, although the sport design speaks about the opposite. All the same, the Japanese was in vain released Lancer with such a motor that spoils the overall impression of a good car. In the urban cycle, the flow rate is 10 liters, the box of MCP works well.

With engine 1.6.

• Yaroslav, Tambov. The machine is generally satisfied. Not the best car, but ideal in terms of endurance and adaptability to Russian conditions. 1.6-liter motor could be more and more powerful, overclocking up to hundreds for 12 seconds with stretch. Mechanics works clearly, but does not save the situation. The average consumption of 10 liters per 100 km. In the cabin is spacious, materials and plastics are made qualitatively, everything looks stylish and cool, not to frighten.
• Alexey, Nizhny Novgorod. Bought Lancer in 2008 with a 1.6-liter engine. Looking at a large car feed, I thought at first that Lancer had a huge trunk against the background of competitors. But in fact it turned out that it is even less than in the predecessor. Its volume is only 325 liters - a bench outcome, and a bold minus for it. I would not buy, if I had no infused wife. She just liked the car in all respects. Consumption of 10 liters per 100 km.
• Igor, Rostov. I am a big fan of the Mitsubishi Lancer family in my time, I had a seventh generation lancer in my time, and since then I have not missed a single generation, so there is something to compare with. I have a tenth lancer with a 1.6-liter engine and mechanical mechanics, consumes 10 liters per 100 km. The speakers are enough for the city, but not for the track. In this regard, the last Lancer was preferable.
• Yaroslav, Nizhny Novgorod region. I liked the car as a whole, equipped with a 1.6-liter engine and manual transmission, the average gasoline consumption per 100 km is 9-10 liters, I fill AI-95. Comfortable, reliable and inexpensive transport for the city.
• Mikhail, Taganrog. The machine is generally satisfied, only if the engine is more powerful, and it would be perfect. Put a new shine, now in the cabin quietly. With a tough suspension somehow resigned. Handling is not bad, like brakes. 1.6-liter motor consumes 10 liters per 100 km.
• Paul, Moscow region. Lancer 10 I did not surprise me, the car is like a car. Not the fastest, but inexpensive in service. In addition, does not require frequent service visits. With a motor 1.6 and MCP put in 9-10 liters.
• Vasily, Petrozavodsk. Lancer 10 is the perfect car at the ratio of value and quality. I wanted more car for little money. In my opinion, I made the right choice. There are enough deficiencies in Lancer, but there are more advantages. For example, this is cool handling. 1.6 Litrovik consumes 9-10 liters with energetic driving.
• Nikolay, Tula region. I liked the car, praise a wheelbarrow for reliability and inexpensive spare parts. Hard suspension, noisy interior - it will be necessary to modify. In the city stacked 10 liters with a motor 1.6.
• Vladislav, Bryansk. Praise Lancer 10 only for a stylish appearance. With its compact sizes, Lancer looks more than it really is. The car is already outdated, and it must be recognized. I drove 130 thousand km, and during this time Lancer even more convinced me in his Japanese quality. And the noisy interior, rigid suspension, vibration, etc. - are all quirks. Consumption of 10 liters per hundred.
• Nikolay, Yaroslavl. Mitsubishi Lancer 10th generation I got from relatives. New such, I would never bought for anything. And if for free, then of course with pleasure. Little trunk, hard suspension, modest 1.6-liter and bad visibility back - minuses. But reliability at the height, and it all decides. Consumption in the city of 10 liters.

Engine 1.8.

• Lyudmila, Pyatigorsk. I have a Lancer 10 with a 1.8-liter engine. The car has a good dynamics, a 140-strong engine is revealed by the full program. In addition, a clear mechanical box introduces its contribution to acceleration. The car consumes 10 liters in the urban cycle, the city is stacked 7-8 liters. With energetic driving, you can put in 11 liters. When driving at high speed, consumption comes and at all up to 12 liters per 100 km. Overclocking until hundreds takes only 10 seconds, it is a great figure against competitors.
• Maxim, Magnitogorsk. Cool cars with a valued name. I recognize the lancer, the car is at times better than its predecessor. Dynamic and moderately comfortable car, as far as possible for sports "lighters." Handling - above all silence, Lancer confidently steals even on a winding road. Course stability - also at the highest level. The car seems to give me the second youth, and I feel 20 years younger. With a motor 1.8 and mechanics laid at 10-11 liters per 100 km.
• Nikolay, Kaliningrad. A decent car, worth the money spent. Neither a penny regretted that he was overpaid for a more topical 1.8-liter version. I needed dynamics and good handling, and comfort for me is a minor thing. In the city consumption is 10-11 liters.
• Mikhail, Moscow. Mitsubishi Lancer is one of the most affordable sports machines, took a 1.8-liter option with mechanics. Purchase is pleased, arranges 100%. Consumes no more than 11-12 liters per hundred.
• Karina, Simferopol. The car is needed, the perfect option for urban trips. It is perfectly controlled and almost not as cubed, also praise well-minded brakes. 1.8 L engine with mechanics consumes from 10 to 11 liters.
• Paul, Stavropol Territory. Cool cars for every day, I get a storm of emotions from the management of this wheelbarrow. With practicality, Lancer is not very good, but dynamics and handling - at a decent level. 1.8-liter motor consumes up to 12 l / 100 km, if you drive in consistently high speed.