What to choose: Renault Logan and Chevrolet Cobalt. Comparison of Chevrolet Cobalt and Renault Logan Which is better for iron cobalt or logan

The Brazilian branch of GM, by 2011, independently developed its own vision of the state employee. The project was named Chevrolet Cobalt, the novelty, as a concept, was presented in the summer of 2011 in Buenos Aires. Until the end of 2011, sales of this sedan started in South America, and in 2012 the “global” Chevrolet Cobalt reached the Russian market.

In order to avoid confusion, let us immediately clarify that the model of the same name was produced in the USA under the Chevrolet brand in 2004-2010 (GM Delta platform) - using this platform were also produced: Opel Astra H (2004-2009), Opel Zafira, Chevrolet HHR ...

The second incarnation of the Chevrolet Cobalt uses the old Delta platform - shortened by 4 mm (2620 mm), the manufacturer positions this car as a representative of the European class "B". The four-door, "South American" sedan has 4479 mm length, 1735 mm width, 1514 mm height, and with its dimensions is located between the Chevrolet Aveo and Chevrolet Cruze sedans.

The appearance of the 2012 Chevrolet Cobalt model year from the Brazilian designers turned out to be original, but boring. The front part with large almond-shaped headlights, an immodest size false radiator grille, a bumper with an additional air duct and "cannons" for fog lights is made in the corporate style of the brand. Only the disproportionately large dimensions of the headlights and the radiator grille introduce a certain imbalance in the appearance of this car.

The sides of the body with a high waist line (small glass), an almost flat roof, powerful rear pillars, round wheel arches and a lean trunk look fresh, without a hitch.

The stamping at the bottom of the doors somewhat dilutes the mood, but its configuration seems to be asking to be protected by a plastic overlay. The stern with a huge trunk lid is discordant with the "child size" bumper and rear lighting, which is made in the style of "Corsa sedan".

The dimensions of the practical luggage compartment of the Chevrolet Cobalt sedan are 545 liters (leave the former class record holder, Renault Logan, far behind).

The internal component of the second incarnation of the Chevrolet Cobalt sedan in many solutions has something in common with the interior design of the 2012 Chevrolet Aveo model year. The same three-spoke steering wheel with a metal insert (the steering column is adjustable in four directions), an original motorcycle dashboard, a front dashboard with open shelves for small things. The center console with an attractive and ergonomic configuration and multimedia system, with convenient control knobs for the heater and air conditioning.

The seats in the Chevrolet Cobalt also migrated from the Aveo, the front ones with a bright anatomical shape and pronounced lateral support not only for the cushion, but also for the back of the chair.

The pillow in the back row is molded for two passengers, and there are two headrests, the third seated person will be uncomfortable. In the second row there is plenty of legroom, passengers of average height will not feel cramped.

The materials used in the interior trim will not be expensive, but of acceptable quality. In addition, the Chevrolet Cobalt II has the ability to complete with climate control, power windows, power and heated mirrors, front airbags, CD / MP3 radio.

Specifications. For the Russian and market, the second Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a petrol 1.5-liter 105-horsepower engine. There will be two gearboxes for it: 5-speed "mechanics" or 6-speed "automatic".

The dynamics of the sedan does not depend on the type of gearbox - it is, in any case, 11.7 seconds "to the first hundred", and the maximum speed is 170 km / h.

But in terms of fuel efficiency - "mechanics", nevertheless, wins. Fuel consumption (and the manufacturer recommends 95th gasoline) with manual transmission will be 6.5 liters per 100 km in "mixed" mode (8.4 - "in the city" or 5.3 - "on the highway"), and with "automatic" fuel consumption will increase to 7.6 liters "on average" (10.4 in the urban cycle or 5.9 on the highway).

By the way, the Basil version of the Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with 1.4 liter EconoFlex engines. with a power of 97 hp. when running on gasoline and delivering 102 hp ethanol (Brazil is the world's largest biofuel producer). A 5-speed manual gearbox is offered to help the engine. Dynamics up to "hundreds" of 11.9 seconds, with a maximum speed of 170 km / h.

Chevrolet Cobalt is built on a classic budget car suspension: independent front on MacPherson struts, rear semi-independent with a torsion beam.

In general, knowing the characteristics of the suspension, the engine power and the gearbox used, it is not difficult to understand how the budget Chevrolet Cobalt will behave on the road. The car is built on the proven Delta platform, a typical representative of which is the Opel Astra H (now out of production). So, on roads with poor coverage, the driver and passengers will have to take on all the pits, joints and road ripples due to the stiff suspension. With a leisurely ride, the steering will be adequate, body roll will be negligible. It won't work, the car is not "tuned" for high-speed taxiing and abrupt rearrangements. In critical situations, it is possible for the rear axle to slip into a skid, but good and tenacious brakes should save the situation.
Summing up, this "Cobalt" can be attributed to a number of typical representatives of the "budget segment". The main features of the car: original design, interesting functional interior, mediocre handling.

The budget Chevrolet Cobalt sedan is produced for the CIS countries in Uzbekistan (at the GM Uzbekistan plant).

Options and prices. In 2015, Chevrolet Cobalt is offered on the Russian market in two trim levels: LT and LTZ. The cost of a sedan in the basic configuration "LT" (with a 1.5-liter, 105-horsepower engine and a 5-speed manual transmission) starts at 571 thousand rubles. And "Cobalt" with the same engine, but already with "automatic" is offered at a price of 637 thousand rubles. For a price of 668 thousand rubles, a top-end Chevrolet Cobalt configuration will be offered (the equipment additionally includes: ABS, an airbag for the front passenger, foglights, a CD + USB audio system, rear power windows and 15 ″ alloy wheels).

As soon as Lanos left the sphere of influence of Chevrolet, a noticeable clearing formed in the model range of the Korean division. Koreans are not one of those who will lose their own, so Lanos was quickly replaced. In 2012, we presented a completely new car for our buyer, the Chevrolet Cobalt. What kind of car it was and what the buyer in the Russian Federation lost with the departure of Chevrolet from the horizon, let's figure it out together.

Korean Brazilian Cobalt

General Motors Korea operates with tried and tested methods. Under the banner of the famous American brand, cars are being sold that have never seen America before, except that they have some intersection planes with cars from Brazil. The Chevrolet Cobalt name is quite famous in the US, but it is not at all the car that we sold. Here is a photo of the American Chevrolet Cobalt SS.

Perhaps the difference can be seen with the naked eye. Our Chevrolet Cobalt, the technical characteristics of which we also presented in the table, differs from the overseas namesake to almost everyone.

They have only one thing in common - a butterfly on the radiator.

Belonging to an eminent brand in the design had to be clearly traced, which is why the entire car was designed around the Chevrolet cross, the cross bar, characteristic of the brand at the time, and the trunk lid with a kink, which added the car a little more resemblance to the American namesake. Actually, that's all. The rest is the work of Korean and Brazilian brush and caliper craftsmen.

Interior and ergonomics of the Chevrolet Cobalt

Four doors and a trunk were simply added to the cross, because sedans are selling well in the CIS. Actually, for a car with a price tag in the region of 500 thousand more is not needed. Rides, Chevrolet, new, roomy trunk. We'll buy the rest.

But if you look into the salon, you won't have to buy especially a lot, since the salon surprised you with its thoughtfulness and ergonomics. Confused only by the quality of finishing materials and assembly, but this is the cost of localization. What do you want for half a million, what is the price, the same is the quality. There are also positive aspects in the cabin regarding materials, but you can touch them only in the most expensive trim levels. Partially, the door cards and the front panel can be trimmed with leather, which gives solidity to even such a nondescript sedan.

Cobalt or Renault Logan

The eternal rival of the Chevrolet Cobalt has always been Renault Logan. And it is in the cabin that the Russian-speaking Frenchman loses to the Brazilian Korean. The ergonomics of the car are at their best. All functions and access to them are logical, everything that needs to be seen constantly is visible. There is no such thing in Logan. And you don't need to reach anywhere, at least from the driver's seat. All knobs and buttons are within reach.

The dashboard has a strange blue tint, but it reads well and its configuration resembles a tidy from the Honda P1, the famous sports bike. Stylistic overkill, we agree, but everything is clearly visible and the convenient steering wheel does not overlap the readings of the instruments.

Despite the fact that the Chevrolet Cobalt loses 10 mm in wheelbase to Logan, the interior is more spacious, not to mention the trunk. Here the Korean is the champion in the class. As many as 563 liters of volume. This is 50 liters more than that of the same Logan, not to mention the more modest models.

Operation and technology Chevrolet Cobalt

Especially not worth touching on the technical characteristics. This is not in the hands of Cobalt. Because the car in our market was equipped with one engine and two boxes - mechanics and automatic. The petrol naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine with a volume of one and a half liters produces 105 forces, which is not so bad for a cheap car. It is especially gratifying for the owners of a Chevrolet Cobalt with a six-speed automatic that automatic transmissions cannot be found for that kind of money either in Logan or in Solaris. Only in Aveo and Polo Sedan, but these are cars of a slightly different league, although also budgetary.

The car platform is simple and several dozen models are assembled on it around the world. Front suspension - standard MacPherson strut, rear - torsion bar semi-dependent. Moderately tough and reasonably cheap. The suspension is easy to repair and maintain, and you can find absolutely any spare parts for replacement, since the platform is global. This is also a definite plus of Cobalt.

How much does the Chevrolet Cobalt package cost?

Options and prices are formed where the Chevrolet Cobalt is assembled. For our market, this is sunny Uzbekistan. Uzbek automakers generously showered Cobalt with complete sets and there were as many as four of them. The body, however, is one, but the level of equipment is different. The simplest car in the database is already equipped with:

• power steering;
• central lock with remote control;
• heated rear window;
• stamped steel discs 15 inches.

The next-priced configurations can have almost everything you need for a budget car - air conditioning, ABS, power windows and alloy wheels. The most expensive Chevrolet Cobalt at that time cost about 600,000 rubles.

A decent car for an unassuming and poor audience. A controversial design can easily pay off with a large trunk, decent endurance engine, and, of course, price. Good luck to everyone!

What will happen in 2019: expensive cars and disputes with the government

Due to the growth of VAT and the unclear future of state support programs for the car market, new cars in 2019 will continue to rise in price. We found out how the auto companies will negotiate with the government and what new items will be brought.

However, this state of affairs only stimulated buyers to make decisions more quickly, and an additional argument was the VAT increase planned for 2019 from 18 to 20%. Leading auto companies told Autonews.ru what tests await the industry in 2019.

The numbers: sales are growing for 19 consecutive months

According to the results of new car sales in November 2018, the Russian car market showed an increase of 10% - thus, the market has continued to grow for 19 months in a row. According to the Association of European Businesses (AEB), 167,494 new cars were sold in Russia in November, and in total, from January to November, automakers sold 1,625,351 cars, which is 13.7% more than last year.

According to the AEB, December sales results should be comparable to November. And by the end of the whole year, the market is expected to reach 1.8 million of sold passenger cars and light commercial vehicles, which will mean a 13% plus.

Most noticeably in 2018, according to data from January to November, the sales of Lada (324 797 units, + 16%), Kia (209 503, + 24%), Hyundai (163 194, + 14%), VW (94 877, + 20%), Toyota (96,226, + 15%), Skoda (73,275, + 30%). Mitsubishi began to enter the lost positions in Russia (39,859 units, + 93%). Despite the growth, Subaru (7026 units, + 33%) and Suzuki (5303, + 26%) lagged behind the brand.

We increased sales in BMW (32,512 units, + 19%), Mazda (28,043, + 23%), Volvo (6854, + 16%). "Shot" premium sub-brand from Hyundai - Genesis (1626 units, 76%). Stable in terms of performance in Renault (128 965, + 6%), Nissan (67 501, + 8%) Ford (47 488, + 6%), Mercedes-Benz (34 426, + 2%), Lexus (21 831, + 4%) and Land Rover (8 801, + 9%).

Despite the positive numbers, the overall volume of the Russian market remains low. According to the agency "Autostat", historically the market showed its maximum value in 2012 - then 2.8 million cars were sold, in 2013 sales decreased to 2.6 million. In 2014, the crisis came only towards the end of the year, so there was no dramatic fall in the market - Russians managed to buy 2.3 million cars at "old" prices. But in 2015, sales fell to 1.5 million units. The negative dynamics continued in 2016, when sales dipped to a record low of 1.3 million vehicles. Demand revived only in 2017, when Russians bought 1.51 million new cars. Thus, the initial figures for the Russian automotive industry are still far away, as well as the status of the first-selling market in Europe, which was predicted for Russia in the pre-crisis years.

Representatives of auto companies interviewed by Autonews.ru believe that sales volumes in 2019 will be comparable to the results of 2018: according to their estimates, Russians will buy the same amount of cars or slightly less. Most expect January and February to fail, after which sales will rise again. However, the auto brands refuse official forecasts until the beginning of the new year.

“In 2019, the cars purchased in the pre-crisis 2014 will already be five years old - for Russians this is a kind of psychological mark on which they are ready to think about replacing a car,” said Kia Marketing Director Valery Tarakanov in an interview with Autonews.ru.

Prices: cars went up all year

After the crisis in 2014, new cars in Russia rose by an average of 66% by November 2018, according to Avtostat. For 11 months of 2018, cars on average became more expensive by 12%. The agency's experts came to the conclusion that auto companies have now practically won back the fall of the ruble against world currencies. But it is stipulated that this does not mean a freeze in prices.

Inflation and an increase in the VAT rate from the beginning of 2019, from 18% to 20%, will contribute to a further rise in the price of cars. Representatives of auto companies in conversations with the Autonews.ru correspondent also do not hide that the increase in VAT will directly affect the cost of cars, and from the very beginning of 2019 - this, for example, was confirmed by Renault, AvtoVAZ and Kia.

Discounts, bonuses and new prices: when is the best time to buy a car

“On the threshold of the last quarter of the year, the Russian automotive market continued to demonstrate strong growth. However, this pleasant fact did not come as a surprise given the tailwind in the sails of the entire retail sector, which is counting down the time until the VAT change. There is growing concern among market participants about the sustainability of retail demand starting from January 2019, ”explained Jörg Schreiber, Chairman of the AEB Automobile Manufacturers Committee.

At the same time, carmakers hope that the ruble exchange rate will not change much in relation to foreign currencies, thus avoiding price surges.

State support programs: gave half the amount

In 2018, two times less money was allocated for the programs of state support for the car market that are popular among Russians in comparison with 2017 - 34.4 billion rubles. instead of the previous 62.3 billion rubles. At the same time, only 7.5 billion rubles were spent on targeted programs designed specifically for motorists. We are talking about such programs as "The First Car" and "Family Car", which apply to cars worth up to 1.5 million rubles.

The rest of the money went to more specific programs like Svoe Delo and Russian Tractor. 1.295 billion was spent on measures for the development and production of vehicles with remote and autonomous control, 1.5 billion on stimulating the acquisition of ground electric transport, on measures to stimulate production in the Far East (we are talking about compensation of transport costs for auto companies) - 0.5 billion rubles, for the purchase of NGV equipment - 2.5 billion rubles.

Thus, the government, as promised, continues to systematically reduce the volume of state support for the industry. For comparison: in 2014 only 10 billion rubles. went to recycling and trade-in programs. In 2015, 43 billion rubles were allocated to support the automotive industry, of which 30% was also spent on utilization and trade-in. In 2016, the cost of state support for the auto industry reached 50 billion rubles, of which half was also spent on similar targeted programs.

As for 2019, the situation with state support remains. So, in the middle of the year, the Ministry of Industry and Trade announced that the programs "First Car" and "Family Car" were extended until 2020 inclusive. They should allow buying new cars with a 10-25% discount. However, the automakers claim that they have not yet received any confirmation of the extension of the programs - the Ministry of Industry and Trade has not been able to clarify the situation and answer the request of Autonews.ru for a month.

Meanwhile, at a recent meeting with automakers, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak said that the volume of state support for the domestic automotive industry is five times higher than the budget revenues from this industry.

“Now it is 9 rubles per 1 ruble of income to the budget system from the auto industry. This is with a utilization fee, and without a utilization fee - 5 rubles of state support, ”he said.

Kozak explained that these figures should make one think about the conditions under which state support measures should be provided to the auto industry, adding that the vast majority of business sectors do not receive any support from the state at all.

Disputes with the government: car companies are unhappy

In 2018, disputes between auto companies and the government over the terms of further work in the market escalated. The reason was the expiring agreement on industrial assembly, which gives auto companies that have invested in the localization of production a tangible set of benefits, including tax ones. This situation primarily means that manufacturers in the face of uncertainty can postpone the launch of new models, which, by the way, threatened in Renault. In addition, it is more difficult for companies to predict their pricing policy. At the moment, the government, represented by the Ministry of Industry and Trade and the Ministry of Economic Development, has not yet been able to develop a unified strategy.

Until recently, the departments offered different tools to replace the finalizing decree on industrial assembly No. 166. Thus, the Ministry of Industry and Trade actively lobbied for the signing of individual special investment contracts (SPICs) between the government and auto companies. The document presupposes a certain set of benefits, which is determined separately with each signatory, depending on the size of investments, including in R&D and export development. This tool has been repeatedly criticized by car company executives for lack of transparency and too strict requirements in terms of further investments.

The Ministry of Economics, in turn, opposed for a long time and insisted that only those who produce high-tech products, which do not belong to cars, could work under SPICs. The FAS also joined the negotiations with the position that companies should not form alliances and consortia, that is, they should not unite to sign SPICs. At the same time, it was precisely this idea of ​​combining brands to obtain a synergistic effect that the Ministry of Industry and Trade began to promote many years ago.

Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak had to intervene in the conflict situation, who created a special working group, invited representatives of all auto companies to it and also expressed a number of his own ideas. But this did not defuse the situation either - car brands complained about newcomers, including Chinese companies, which could count on state support from scratch, about their unwillingness to invest too much in R&D and export organization.

Currently, according to Autonews.ru sources participating in the negotiations, the overweight is on the side of the Ministry of Industry and Trade, and a number of auto companies are already preparing to sign SPICs in the new year. And this means new investments, projects and models, the appearance of which can revive the Russian car market.

New models: there will be many premieres in 2019

Despite accurate forecasts from automakers, most of them are preparing a lot of new products for Russia. For example, Volvo Autonews.ru told that they will bring a new Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 Cross Country. Suzuki will launch the updated Vitara SUV and the new Jimny compact SUV.

Skoda will bring the updated Superb and the Karoq crossover to Russia next year, Volkswagen in 2019 will begin Russian sales of the Arteon liftback, as well as new modifications of the Polo and Tiguan. AvtoVAZ will roll out Lada Vesta Sport, Granta Cross and promises a few more new products.

The first generation was considered a rookie debutant in the segment of inexpensive sedans, the second generation turned him into an experienced master. Now it is the starting point for all "recruits" who have not yet had time to smell gunpowder. And the manufacturers of Chevrolet Cobalt, who released this model, as a direct competitor to Logan, should have understood this. Let's disassemble both cars to the bone and find out if Cobalt is worthy of Logan?

Renault Logan of the first generation immediately went to the masses

The fact that everything changes over time - and the budgets of buyers, and the concept of a "real" good car - is not news. I recall that a few years ago they said that the idea of ​​French automakers regarding Renault Dacia / Logan would cost good money. They were counting on the amount of 5 thousand US dollars and did not aim for more. Indeed, at first the project was implemented and the first Logan went to the masses, only now the price confidently stepped over not 5, but 10 thousand mark. Today the dollar is not the same as it used to be, but Logan is still holding on and has few competitors.

Interestingly, the Renault Logan manufacturers set themselves the goal of not being easy to compete with A-class cars, but competing with a higher class. And the designers are striving, which is remarkable, by any means to create a good spaciousness of the cabin and make the size of the trunk incredibly voluminous. This rearmost compartment is larger than many golf cars and even rivals the luggage racks of some D-class sedans.

Known several years ago, it also became interested in the release of similar budget models that would always keep the price. Citroen C-Elysee and 301st, and last year and Chevrolet, decided to play by the same rules and released into the arena a direct competitor - Chevrolet Cobalt. This car is the development of one of the subsidiaries of General Motors, which was originally aimed at the countries of the so-called third world. It was decided to start the production of Chevrolet Cobalt, respectively, in one of the Central Asian republics.

What are the differences

Let's start with the design, which would seem to be the most thankless task, but what can you do. It was the exterior surfaces of the Chevrolet Cobalt body that made us do it. They seem to be ironed, if not by amateurs, then by novice designers, but Logan's appearance cannot be said for sure. It immediately shows that this is a second generation car; neither money nor effort was spared to improve its exterior.

The interior of both cars has almost the same feeling. Logan, for whom sophisticated solutions and expensive materials were limited (why be surprised, because this is a state employee ?!), should not have, but is perceived much more pleasant and logical than Cobalt. It is impossible not to note the peculiarities of the layout of the Chevrolet Cobalt's cabin, where, in order to ensure maximum roominess, they emphasized the vertical position of the landing and placed the front seats clearly high. It turns out that with an average build, even at the lowest position of the seat, it will still sit high, like on a chair. If the driver's height is above average, then it is dangerous to get into this car, since you will definitely rest your head against the ceiling. It seems that in this situation, you expect excellent visibility, but alas, to make this happen, you need to at least halve the front pillars of the body.

Logan Advantage

It is explicit. Better with Logan with vertical seat adjustment, which is not formal, like its competitor. In addition, the range of the settings themselves is wide, and the driver's, even despite the shorter cushion in length. As for ergonomics, Logan could only be scolded for minor flaws, such as the LED air conditioner button, rear power window buttons, and so on.

In both vehicles, there is sufficient clearance in front of the knees of the rear passengers. As much as 10 cm of clearance is enough to comfortably travel the longest distances.

In general, both in height and in length, Logan represents more space. But the width is more spacious in Cobalt, which is clearly seen at shoulder level.

Riding

Nobody was going to judge strictly according to driving characteristics. The fact is that it is enough for such sedans to show acceptable control accuracy, predictability of reactions and excellent stability. The rest is not so important anymore.

But to thoroughly test the energy intensity of the suspension is another matter. And both sedans did not disappoint, showing good resistance to breakdowns on uneven roads. This parameter is very important on our Russian roads.

Still more comfortable driving on Logan. Cobalt shakes more often on small irregularities, and its body plays in unison with the longitudinal and transverse gradients of the road surfaces. All this negatively affects not only the passengers, but also the driver, who is constantly tense. the roads are not asphalted everywhere and Cobalt in this regard already loses to Logan, who copes much better with bad roads.

But you can't find fault with the suspensions of both sedans. They do not lead to buildup, even with alternating irregularities. In addition, with vigorous maneuvering, there is no feeling of roll, as on some cars. Both cars performed well in terms of motion sickness. Tested on children prone to motion sickness and it worked out without a hitch.

Dynamics and its nuances

Some, when conducting the test, called Cobalt more dynamic. But this is in the event that you are not lazy and spin the engine a little more, in a timely manner switching to low gears.

In the dynamics of acceleration, Logan is unambiguous. He accelerates with great desire and even from the very bottom (without showing any special dexterity, you can safely get under way at 2nd speed). Logan does not have any special requirements for choosing the right stage and is much more convenient than Cobalt. One could put it this way: Logan is just the perfect car, but it's a pity that it does not have an automatic transmission, like the expensive version of Cobalt.

Prices

And finally, the most important thing for our buyer, who only recently began to understand that it is not only the cost of the car that lies. So, the prices for the Cobalt version start at 483 thousand rubles. I am glad that the basic version of the car includes heated front seats and mirrors in the set of options, this is very important for our Russian winter. As for the speaker system, only the so-called "preparation" is provided, for which the owner must already select the head speakers separately. But the ABS, alloy wheels, "foglights", a computer, an alarm - all this comes only with expensive versions, already for 572 thousand rubles, which includes the long-awaited automatic transmission.

As far as Logan is concerned, this sedan has a decent choice of engines when it comes to engines. With a single 5 manual transmission, you can choose an option with 82 liters. with. or from 102 liters. with. The most affordable version with 82 hp. with. the engine is sold for 355 thousand rubles. It implies scarce options. The cost of Renault Logan with a 102 hp engine. with. starts at 428 thousand rubles, but here the set of options is much wider. There are ABS, power steering and much more. Although, interestingly, the air conditioner costs an additional payment of 25 thousand rubles. The most expensive Renault Logan equipment includes the necessary set of security and comfort systems, and in addition to everything, there is an opportunity for an additional payment of 14 thousand rubles to become the owner of Multimedia.

Pros and cons

Chevrolet Cobalt

• Good roominess.
• Wide rear of the cabin compared to Renault Logan.
• The mirror adjustment panel is conveniently located on the door, in harmony with the mirror.
• The back seat is wider than the opponent's.
• Convenient control of the microclimate buttons.
• Easy to read and large numbers on the instrument scales.
• Driver's seat too high.
• Less comfortable interior overall.
• Finishing materials of the worst quality.
• Dissonance in a combination of digital and analogue feeds and dials.

Test drive a Chevrolet Cobalt car:

Renault Logan

• Ease of landing.
• Excellent organization of access to most of the controls.
• Nice and high quality finishing materials.
• Cozier, more ergonomic and more aesthetic than its rival.
• More headroom in the rear.
• There is no steering column offset adjustment.
• Lack of automatic transmission.
• There is not enough engine temperature gauge in the instrument cluster.
• Inconvenient adjustment of air flow distribution.

Renault Logan car test drive:

Now let's try to digest all the information listed above. What do we get? Cobalt has fewer options and has only one powertrain to choose from. But there is a choice of automatic transmission and manual transmission.

Logan has more options, despite the lack of an automatic transmission. This sedan also has a package selection system. All this a priori indicates that Renault Logan again showed a more friendly approach to the buyer than his opponent.

Conclusion

The experience of creating a car tailored for the budget market played a role. Chevrolet Cobalt in terms of consumer preferences is inferior to Logan. On the other hand, it is larger in size, and the configuration of the rear compartment itself is only praiseworthy. Cobalt has a powerful and omnivorous suspension, it is unpretentious and simple.

If Cobalt was a little cheaper than it is, then he managed to compete with Logan, and so, this is still an unripe fruit that still has to grow and grow. Logan can be reproached with, perhaps, archaic engines, the modernization of which the manufacturer was obliged to carry out, even in the absence of real competition in the class.

The results of our comparison test are as follows. The game, to be honest, initially went only with one goal, and Cobalt acted as a defender. Only in the nomination "Trunk" he was able to win, but otherwise completely lost to Logan. According to our experts, 69.5 points were given to the Chevrolet Cobalt, which, in addition to a good trunk, also showed good functionality, excellent noise insulation and comfortable steering.

Renault Logan gets 71.5 points. On almost all counts, he is a cut above his opponent, and this is not surprising, because, as mentioned above, the experience has done its job.

In the current situation, you can expect good visibility, but it is hampered by the wide A-pillars.

A clear advantage The Logan has much better ergonomics: the vertical adjustment is not formal: the range is sufficient, and the seat itself is more comfortable.

In terms of ergonomics, Logan can only be scolded for minor flaws: the LED of the air conditioner button is on when it is turned off, and the rear power window buttons are located on the center console.

If a driver of average height sits back "behind him", then in both cars he will find a sufficient gap in front of the knees - 8-10 cm.

In height, as in the front row, the Logan provides more space, and in width at shoulder level, the Cobalt is 10 mm more spacious.

Discussing the driving properties of both "state employees", it makes no sense to lay out on the shelves the nuances of handling. If such a sedan provides acceptable steering precision, predictability of reactions and good stability, this is enough.

But on the smoothness and energy intensity of the suspension, one should dwell in more detail. In terms of resistance to breakdowns when driving through irregularities in the suspension of both rivals, they are highly commendable.

This is a really important factor for our roads, because the asphalt is not even everywhere. If we compare which one is more comfortable, then Logan wins a little.

On small irregularities, especially with sharp edges, Cobalt more often bothers riders with shaking, and also conveys in more detail to the body not only longitudinal, but also transverse differences in the road profile.

It should be noted that the treatment of alternating irregularities with the suspension does not lead to swinging, and with vigorous maneuvering, there is no feeling of roll. Both test participants checked ...

Chevrolet cobalt

For this car, the designers managed to provide good capacity and even, moreover, to make the rear of the cabin a little wider than that of the rival.

However, in the struggle for longitudinal capacity, costs were not avoided, and the driver's seat was positioned high even at the lowest level of the adjustment range.

Some of the drivers, especially those of small stature, may like this position: I sit high, I look far away.

But when a tall person gets behind the wheel, the ceiling is too low. In general, the Cobalt interior is perceived as less comfortable both in terms of ergonomics and in general perception, in particular, due to the materials of finishing.

Despite the fact that the rivals are the same in overall width, the space in the cabin at the shoulder level of the rear passengers is slightly more in the Cobalt.

The mirror adjustment panel is conveniently arranged on the door, flush with the mirror. The numbers are large and easy to read. Dissonance is only in the combination of digital and analogue presentation. Simple and convenient: the handwheels allow you to control the microclimate without taking your eyes off the road.

Both cars show excellent suspension energy. But if you compare them in terms of comfort, then Logan wins a little.

Nuances of dynamics

Cobalt can be considered dynamic, but with a caveat: for this you need not be lazy to spin the engine a little more and switch to low gears in time. Logan is undemanding to
timeliness of the choice of the desired stage. There is no doubt about the ease of control Logan - forgiving and maximally “friendly.

Renault Logan

The Logan, like the rival in the test, has no steering column adjustment, but the fit is generally noticeably better. Regardless of your body type, you can easily find the optimal position in less than a minute. Access to most of the controls is well organized.

The notes concern only insignificant nuances of using individual buttons. In the interior decoration, the manufacturer managed to avoid the sensations of an obvious economy option. The fabric that covers the seats makes a good impression.

In general, the Logan is perceived as a more comfortable, ergonomic and aesthetic vehicle. The front panel is finished with hard plastics, but due to the selection of texture and color
scale, there is no feeling that you have saved on the interior.

In the version that combines the additional functions of the steering wheel with a leather sheath, the grip in the spoke area is not very comfortable. The instrument cluster looks like an adult, but the engine temperature gauge is missing here.

Nice, but it is hardly possible to adjust the distribution of air flows without looking. In the rear, the Logan has slightly more headroom.