What car is better than Opel or Volkswagen. Opel Astra III or Volkswagen Golf V - What is better? Addition with subtraction

the main / Butter

The love of our compatriots to the sedans are incomprehensible and dimensionless. The incarnation of the ideas of the Volkswagen Jetta car is named after a strong gust of the wind. The most complete name of this wind stream - Jet Stream, which can rush and develop speed up to 160 km / h.

Cars Volkswagen Jetta or competitor Opel Astra were produced for markets on which these modifications are widely demanded. Astra-Sedan is a competitor of Mexican German. Although the "Astra" and the name is not a formidable, but also a simple garden flower is not called it. This brand Auto has long been accustomed to consider natural hatchbeck, although earlier its name was called the name "Cadet."

Renamed with all traditions Opel Astr. They began to produce not only in the body of a sedan and hatchback, but also offered two more Ipostasi: a convertible and wagon. Buyers have a choice. The German developers have created related sedan and hatchback models, but not for sales in their own country. Of course, it is impossible to argue, they are in the presence of German car markets and have the demand of the population, but not with such inspiration, as their five-door conifers.

Astra and Jetta produce and collect far from their homeland, and it relates them to them, although Opel Astra is relative and closer to us, because These rapid sedans securely secured under St. Petersburg, but the German is still manitis and attracts something. However, there will be enough ideas, let's go to the real characteristics and discussion.

In order to objectively and impartially compare the Opel Astra model (sedan) and the similar option - Volkswagen Jetta, we suggest to get acquainted with the main characteristics of the car.

General
Model Volkswagen Jetta. Opel Astra.
Full weight, kg 2020 2065
Curb weight, kg 1375 1393
Gabarits.
Length 4644 4658
Width 1778 1814
Height 1482 1500
The volume of the trunk, l 510 475
Wheelbase 2651 2685
Front track / rear 1535/1532 1544/1558
Clearance 140 165
Engine
Fuel supply type direct injection, as well as additional turbocharging
Volume, cm 3 1390 1364
The number of cylinders and their location 4, inline location
Cylinder diameter and piston stroke, mm 76.5x75.6. 72.5x82.6.
Number of valves 16
Engine power, hp 150 140
Accurate (MAX), km / h 215 205
Overclocking time up to 100 km / h, with 8.6 9.3
Torque (MAX), NHM / rpm 240/4500 200/4900
Transmission
Type of gearbox 6 MCPP / 7 automatic transmission DSG 6 automatic transmission
type of drive Front-wheel drive
Fuel consumption for standards 93/116 / EEC, l / 100 km
Capacity fuel tankL. 55 56
Urban cycle, l 8.1 7.1
Country cycle, l 5.2 4.6
Mixed cycle, l 6.3 5.5

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Choosing a Heart or Mind

We will analyze the benefits of each car individually and find out what is better: Hatchback Astra or Jetta Sedan. Let's start, perhaps, from the most popular model. Volkswagen Jetta justifies all the expectations of the buyer. Designer ideas are based on a rectangle rule. Panel, buttons, screen and the entire interior consist of rectangles and right lines. If the "Folswage" creators were based on Euclidean geometry, then the volume buttons and microclimate control knobs would be the same form as the entire interior. But the mind won, and the designers took advantage of the Circle, and not only by direct and angular subjects of mathematics.

Also, the designers created an outlined visor dashboard and scales on it. The classic won. Rectangular LCD display on the panel like a four-stranded yum from Pushkin works. Many will ask: "Convenient? - Sure! Boring? - it could be worse! Qualitatively? - Perhaps! ", Although the neatly docked panel of soft plastic causes lunizing, despite the simple lines in the interior of the car.

But if we talk about the doors, then this is a purely Mexican direction. An unpleasant and oppressive impression is left by such errors, as, incomprehensible origin, the skin substitute for upholstery or non-accurate dusting of the windowsill. The sound occurring at the closure of the doors cannot be attributed to German production technologies, it seems that there is a lot of space inside the panels for which the wind quietly walks. Uncomfortable, agree?

Comparing what is better today: the Golf Class sedan of Jetta or the Opolevskaya Astra, then compared to the first option, Astra has to himself and enchants. Smooth lines in the interior design circle their head, enveloping bends bring the highlight, and the backlight in the night is puzzled and mysteriousness. This car, it would seem, boldly call the "premium class", however, it is worth it and consider closer - and the fairy tale is the end! The quality of plastic with ridiculous shiny edging, leaves much to be desired.

It is also incomprehensible for which the "Circling" is arranged on the front panel, consisting of four handles, with rotating mechanisms, and several dozen buttons on the console. The onboard electronics is not acceptable for such cars, control and use of it is irrationally, inefficient and difficult. Knippel of four positions hidden in the washer, which, in turn, reacts and rotates with any incorrect movement, inconvenient, any error when searching for the necessary function - and all efforts are in vain, as they say. This is not of modernity, and is clearly not suitable for advanced motorists. The output suggests itself: Jetta sedan is an excellent player, but makes adjustments from another parallelism of reality with unusual elements; Astra - does not reach the desired consumer level, but for an attempt - worthy of respect.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Who is hospitable?

Volkswagen Jetta. Last Salon and Sofa amazes with its magnificence and luxury. It can be bolder to declare that this car can be attributed to the models of the highest classification. Unexpected freedom for legs and knees, stunning. So I want to ask the highest person, two-meter growth, sit down and evaluate the "Volkswagen" geometry. Invited, asked, sat down - appreciated! Not a single complaint did not come.

However, if three passengers are already on the sofa, then comfort will fall, it will interfere with the center tunnel. This is a fee for such a chic all-wheel drive Volkswagen platform. But, in the "shoulders" nowhere will not be hidden, the rear doors are equipped with comfortable armrests. If two is sitting, and not three, then places more than abuse. Plus a wide interstit armrest to better appreciate the comfort. Unfortunately, for those sitting behind the driver of passengers, the amenities are ending with this.

Opel Astra. Rear for passengers is a retractable container and a 12 volt socket. Three oversized sedacaries will be able to fit on the seat. But, landing to the rear seat of three guests is already a feat, the roof of the roof is bought in hatchback and an incredibly high threshold. Oblocked "Folkswagenovsky" will not work - interfere with extensive armrests. And this is not all difficulties. There is not enough place for feet, and this is all that the wheelbase is unsuccessfully located. Conclusion: for transportation with comfort, preferably Volkswagen Jetta.

What is more and more practical?

Take, for example, a conventional resident of the megapolis, which went out of shopping from the store. He has a long time in his hands and at the same time very heavy, which must be put in the car trunk. So, what car will become a real assistant in a difficult situation: Jetta sedan or Astra hatchback.

Aster. In order to open the trunk, you can choose two ways: to find the desired button on the key and press it, or open the door doors and search for the desired button on the console. Of course, in order to fulfill any maneuver, you will have to leave a purchase and decay the trunk. Somehow not very convenient, right?

Jetta. Everything is much easier here. The button, to open the trunk compartment, is located according to the classic scheme, but with signaling vehicles, nevertheless, you need to remove, otherwise nothing will work. You can open from the cabin itself. The only advantage over astors is, it is not a freight compartment cover, and smooth and moderate lifting. Wait is not afraid, convenient?

In order to transport long periods, both cars are equipped with hatches. However, there is a difference. In Opel, a triangle hanging on the loop makes it possible to open, in Volkswagen - on plastics in the hands of the car owner. For those who are just alone, the Luke is not enough: Jetta has to pull the handle from the car cargo department and, putting the muscle strength, push the back of the seating; Opel - everything is simple and understandable, in the spirit of European traditions.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Engine - Power

For those who save, in both cars there are aggregates without an inflatable version with a volume of 1.6 liters, which can be controlled by both mechanics and machine gun. Although Astra's engine is stronger in relics in tens of times, but Jetta is high-speed. Jetta boasts a shrine work of hydromechanics, 1.5 seconds higher than that of Astra. A person who buys a car for a ride must pay special attention to the turbo engines that should be the same volume. Buying Volkswagen Jetta, you can choose among two versions: turbine motor at 122 or 150 horses.

It is worth noting that any of the versions makes it possible to squeeze the adhesion itself or provide this job with a box with a multi-disc two-chaired module. If you look from the point of view of comfortableness - everything is all this, but if you are a lover of a good ride with a sharp gap from the start, then this option is most suitable for you. The start without a tone occurs in almost 10 seconds, and in more powerful versions - For 8 with a little.

What do we answer Opel manufacturers? Turbo - "Four" in power can only be combined with hydromechanism in 6 steps, dynamic driving lovers worth setting up the engine and box. But any version, even the most sophisticated, is greatly inferior to Jett. Astra record 9.2 seconds to 100 km / hour, modest than Volkswagen model.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: better on turns

Volkswagen Jetta. Any driver of this brand should always be remembered which motor is under the hood. The thoroughbred lever with excellent elastokinematics is designed for countries developed in the field of annularization. Non-in-law, an archaic motor - for a calmer ride in the attitude of ordinary cities of Russia, but no one bothers ride. The sedan is endowed with the Rail confidence of Multilink, which allows you to go confidently and purposefully. However, you should not trust the electronics, it is best - this is a concentration of attention, it does not hurt.

Opel Astra. Mechanics are simple and independent of the power of the engine. Even the most powerful models are equipped with a semi-dependent scheme with a tough, which is reliably and convenient, and much better in control. Opel will not allow errors, but there will be no special pleasure.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: bumps and irregularities on the road

Jetta Sedan is inclined to react to the bumps, and transmit such sensations of inconvenience to their passengers. The fastest punch with the wheel, the more shaking in the cabin. It is not recommended to buy special discs to travel comfortably, because An unpleasant sensation is directly related to the number of space occupied in the cabin. But the suspension surprises, it is better than the analogs and slides on the uneven track, as in the waves. The microclimate is also not very pleased, in the cold season - the first 10 km will be torture. Next - better, but not much.

Astra - Volkswagen antipode in the body of a sedan, as the stove works better, pits and irregularities - everything is not necessary, which means the maximum comfort, for sitting passengers in the car. But there are also unpleasant moments. Transparent, even too, arches of wheels. And this car is more noisy than the Jetta sedan. If there were not two of these shortcomings, the deserved victory would be aster.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Testing

Both machines are tested according to the protocol of the European Charter, i.e. Auto cling at the catapult, develop speed up to 65 km / h and here it is, a barrier for impact. And this test, both cars, passed on perfectly. However, it was not without nuances: Jetta showed best result When a collision with the barrier and won in the nomination "Children's Security", and Opel Astra - withstand a perfectly blow from side. All this happened at the highest level. By common security, Astra is equipped with a stabilization system, but you have to lay out a round sum for "curtains" (it only applies to Opel Cosmo). Acquisitioners "Jetty", all air runs are available in Treedline.

Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Cost and complete set

As the advertisers say, for the troubled Opel, the buyer will have to put about 675,000 rubles. This cost includes: mechanics, basic motor power with 1.6 l engine volume, 4 pillows and ESP, air conditioning system, driving seat heating and advanced passenger, front electric windows, steel discs, more or less audio system and alarm. For Sedan Jetta, you will have to post a more substantial amount - 702,000 rubles. Astra-space with a turbo engine is about 913 thousand. What is better to choose to buyer.

The choice is yours!

In general, the purchase options for models with a variety of features and packages of additional services, a lot, everyone chooses what fits him in finance, but do not forget about style. The intricacy and complex structure of both cars does not fully deal with the cost of a model. Jetta in the body of the sedan is better and more expensive, but not much, and Astra has a balanced price tag and more, a rich arsenal bells.

For car markets more independent model - Jetta Sedan. And it is not surprising. Latin American German was ahead of the Astra on a disciplined ride, won. Astra, in turn, better and more and more readily, having pleased many good smooth moves and the refinement of designer ideas, because showed a natural reflection of all the advantages of the car. The main thing is that Opel has reached their advantages due to a reasonable price and available configuration. It is worth noting that russian assembly Played in the case not the most recent role.

Who preferred to live together? Beautiful, smart, with beautiful manners, but big requests or modest, quiet, but very reliable? We are talking about used VW Golf 4 and G.

Evolution and Revolution
Golf 4 appeared on the market in 1997. The model compared with the predecessor Golf 3, evolutionary. The cardinal changes in the design did not happen, and in the technique, by and large, too. But it did not prevent the car successfully sold worldwide.

A big step forward for the company. Top new designwho has nothing to do with the previous Astra, and most importantly - 12 years warranty from end-cutting corrosion of the body.
Both machines were well sold in Russia, so the number of copies presented in the market "our" specimens is quite large.

Golf was produced in options three-five-door hatchback and wagon. Guaranteed from end-cutting corrosion of the body - 12 years. On paintwork - 3 years. These time are quite real, and the body does not arise with the body. On some machines, water flows into rear lightsBut with trouble easily cope with a tube sealant and skilled hands. Golf salon looks very luxurious for small class machine. The qualities of the fittings of the panels and the materials used so far no one has come over. You can play the game "Find 10 differences from VW Passat". The difference number 1 is a close back seat. Despite the confidence of the designers, sit there worse than in the predecessor. There is not enough place for legs, closely in the shoulders ... Even VW Polo is more "friendly" to the rear passengers!

The visibility of good, but the right mirror was created at the request "substituted" on the roads. It is small and consider it is almost impossible to interfere with the right side. Undoubted advantage of Golf - equipment. Buyers and with us, and in Europe rarely ordered basic Golf. Climate control, all kinds of heating are rather the norm than the exception. And at night VW pleases with stylish blue-red backlight of the instrument panel. What can be broken inside? The cup holder and the rear ashtray rarely live more than a year, when inspection does not prevent you from checking their work. Equally as the health of the door locks. They often "buggy", and branded hundred treat them only with replacement (70 $ - lock, 45 $ - replacement). Golf suffers from the fact that the filter in the ventilation system is too good. It needs to be changed ($ 50 filter, $ 10 - replacement) twice a year, in the fall and late spring. One Russian summer scores it completely, and instead of a powerful hurricane in the deflectors, miserable breeze walk. Washers of glasses and headlights do not belong to long-livers. In the mechanism of wipers, the axes of the levers will be sealed, which leads to a breakdown of an electric motor or drive parts. To prevent trouble, the mechanism is better to disassemble and lubricate once a year. A couple of years ago, gray dealers brought a batch of machines intended for the Turkish market. They are better to avoid and check the VIN body code before purchasing. On it can be defined, for which importer a car was made.

With the ASTRA Opel model, for the first time gave a worthy answer to the concern VAG. The same 12 years warranty from end-to-end corrosion and 3 years on paint. And the very confidence in the performance of these norms. Even the oldest cars do not have a trace of corrosion. The point is not only in the galvanized body. Opel rarely rotes outside, usually they rust from the inside and on the welds. At Astra G, all hidden cavities at the factory are processed by anticorrosive, and the welds are carefully sealing. If the machine does not fall into a serious accident, live it 20-25 years before writing off in the scrap.

Astra salon is also good, but after Golf is not impressive. There is no chic in it, gloss in trifles. Yes, and finishing materials are inexpensive. In addition, over time, in some machines, a genetic code called "Rattle" is reminded. Not kadett, of course, the Golf "Sy will be hidish. But the back seat Opel is much more convenient. There are no places there, and two people will not dream about any vectra and omega.

On Kutsa "Golf" Astra mirror meets limited visibility. The wide rear arm racks are forced to recover when moving by reverse. Wins Astra in the volume of the trunk. Universal Astra, perhaps the best "cargo transporter" in this class.

The weaker - the better
Motor gamma Golf 4 has a little common with GOLF 3. Basic engine - aluminum 1,4-liter, but the most popular has a volume of 1.6 liters. Most such cars. Much less with 1.8 and 2.0 engines. "Five" 2.3 and "Six" 2.8 - from the discharge of exotic, but a lot of diesel engines. On the machines of this class Diesel VW - the best in the world. And this conviction would not spoil any Russian diesellark.

With gasoline motors there is no hassle. If you do not replace the air filter on time (25 $ - filter, $ 10 - work), there is a chance to get acquainted with the price of air flow sensor ($ 300). From our gasoline suffer lambda probe ($ 245 - Detail, $ 20 - work) and candles (45 $ - kit, 25 $ - work).

The 1.8T engine in 50% of cases is approaching the turbine replacement ($ 1400 - Detail, $ 165 - work). The pleasure is not cheap, so if you diagnose, special attention should be paid to this node. If the car is under three years old, the manufacturer pays the full cost of the part. It is called such a post-warranty support and operates on all branded hundred.

Replacing oil from gasoline engines is recommended every 15,000 km, timing belt (140 $ - belt and rollers, 110 $ - work) - 90,000 km. Before that time it is better not to reach, but replace it a little earlier. In the form of "kisses" of the valves with pistons were, and repeating other people's mistakes should not be. Engines 2.3 and 2.8 have chain drive camshafts.

Diesel motors - Only 1.9-liter, but options for power mass. Basic atmospheric develops 68 liters. from. He has no turbine, the degree of forcing is small, so he is not so picky about the quality of fuel and oil as its powerful brothers. Turbodiesels VW - fiction on acceleration dynamics and fuel efficiency aggregates. However, they need to follow them. Daily oil level check is required. Motors do not complain about the absence of oil appetite, even in infancy, and the topping is between that is not a sign of the "tired" aggregate. Fuel filter (25 $ - filter, $ 10 - work) changes every 30,000 km, and you need before. Air ($ 30 filter, $ 10 - replacement) It makes sense to change every 10,000 km. Otherwise, the air flow sensor will be replaced (300 $ Sensor + $ 30 work). Any turbodiesel VW is critical to the quality of oil and fuel. And do not forget about the timing of oil replacement !!! In our conditions, the manufacturer recommends doing this every 7500 km. For comparison, in Europe "Oil then" sometimes extended to 50,000 km. Our pathetic 7,500 km suggest that in our sulfur at the gas stations too little fuel.

Separate theme - "Fresh" diesel engines with pumps-nozzles. For them, there is a special oil in terms of quality of oil, and in the fuel it would not hurt to introduce it. One pump-nozzle costs about $ 1000. Conclusion: refueling only on "fans" refills and store checks. As a rule, TDI from Europe has a crazy mileage. 300,000 km for a three-year-old car - the matter is granted. The gearboxes on the VW Golf are the simplest. Either a mechanical transmission or a familiar machine. "Under the curtain" was installed on the car 6-speed mechanics. Characteristic faults They do not have, only on a 1.6-liter motor sometimes fails with a mechanical KP. Symptoms: increased noise, vibration.

Power units are no less. From the weak 1.2-liter to a powerful 2.2-liter. All of them four-cylinder, six-cylinder engines in the gamma was not. Basic 1.2-liter in Russia in demand did not use. But on machines from Europe, it is found. You do not need to be afraid. As a ladies in three-door hatchbacks, it looks convincing. Fuel consumption is small, in the timing of the timing chain, and that before the dynamics ... it is calmer to be, calmer.

The most popular motor on ASTRA is a 1.6-liter 16-valve. But popular does not mean the best. From our gasoline often fail ($ 12 per set), the injection system is odd. By the way, to change the candles (every 40,000 km), you need to remove the intake manifold. Sometimes an increased oil appetite is found, which is eliminated by expensive (up to $ 800) repairs. Its 8-valve fellow is not so powerful, but much easier to operate. From common diseases The exhaust gas recirculation valve is marked ($ 145 - Detail, $ 25 - replacement) and valve idle move ($ 110 - Detail, 25 $ - work).

They climb from our fuel, so the experienced owners once every 20-30 thousand are removed and clean. Then you can not think about replacement.

The late replacement of candles on all motors threatens the failure of the ignition coil (165 $ coil + 15 $ replacement). Replacing the timing belt (150 $ Details, $ 65 - work) - every 60,000 km. You need to change with rollers, with a second replacement - with a water pump. And do not forget about the washing of the injection system every 40-50 thousand.

Astra diesel engines pleases two options: Japanese isuzu with a volume of 1.7 liters and native two-liter. "Japanese" - the most powerful design. This engine leads his own engine from the "Cadet" motors, and over the years the design has been worked out "in ringing". The engine is soft in character: good traction "in nizakh", smooth promotion to maximum revolutions. His power is small, but reliability, resource - above all silence. And he is not limited to fuel. The timing belt and rollers are more expensive than for gasoline engines, but the replacement is required every 100,000 km. The "Opolev" 2.0 liter turbodiesel is more complex, but it has a chain camshaft. It approximately 50,000 km fails the air flow sensor ($ 250). If on time or a little more often change the air filter (16 $ - filter, $ 4 - replacement), its life can be extended. The switching valve of the turbine ($ 250) dies after a decent run on our roads. Replacing oil in diesel engines - every 10,000 km.

In the graduation system after two Russian winters rust rear bank (130 $ Detail + $ 20 work) silencer. However, the same pain and Golf (240 $ Detail + $ 20 work).

The classic dies the last
The most "sweet" in all descriptions of used cars - suspension. Music broken ball supports and silent blocks on our roads will be eternal. But in respect of Golf and Astra, it is not particularly about what. It's all about design diagrams and materials. There are neither fashionable multi-dimensions nor aluminum. The usual steel, McPherson in front, beam behind.

But this "stove" will be found from what "dance". Let's start with Golf. Racks (40 $ Details + 25 $ Replacement) and stabilizer bushings (30 $ Details + 25 $ Replacement) of transverse stability live about 40 thousand km. 80 thousand km usually produce steering traction (275 $ parts + $ 60 work), and to 100 thousand km - hub bearings (213 $ Details + $ 55 replacement), ball supports (110 $ Details + 45 $ Work) and shock absorbers (340 $ Details + $ 100 work). Silent blocks are enough. Unnecessary complaints often arise to the steering. Leak or knock rail is a popular phenomenon. New rail costs $ 720 plus $ 100 for work. With diesel engines suspension dies faster. They weigh more, from here wear.

Astra has always been better than Golf in terms of suspension reliability. So in this generation. The resource of the details of the "Opolev" suspension above. For those interested in reasons: Ballery for Astra G is identical to Omega B! Sleeve comments. In general, the picture is similar to "Golf". Every 30-40 thousand - replacement of stabilizer racks (20 $ parts + $ 20 work), to 100 thousand steering traction ($ 40 per 1pc. + $ 65 replacement), tips ($ 35 per 1 pc. + 17 $ work) , after 120-130 thousand - ball supports, shock absorbers and wheel bearings ($ 250 per 1 pc. + $ 50). The widespread opinion on the unreliability of the rear springs is not entirely true.

In the steering mechanism, an electrohydroysylter is used. As soon as heard suggestion at its work is the norm, and there is nothing terrible in this.

On Astra, like on Golf, there are replaces of steering wheels ($ 1000 + $ 100). But less often.

The brakes were at one time a bad story. Bosch's rear calipers after a small mileage were sealed, so they were replaced by the Lucas in the avral order. If the machine for some reason has not passed the replacement action, get ready to spend it yourself.

"Sweet" options
For lovers, Opel exotic launches two options: Astra Coupe and Astra Cabriolet. Both cars are going at the BERTONE factory in Italy. Different with rich internal finish, extensive list standard equipment and spectacular external species. Specificity is combined with efficiency: 2.0-liter Turbo develops 190 hp This is enough to dispersed Astra Coupe up to 245 km / h.

There was another extreme: Astra Eco 4. 1.7-liter diesel develops 75 hp And 4.4 l / 100 km is satisfied in the mixed cycle.

Golf has interesting modifications much more. For example, a sedan on its base has a name its own: Bora. Original optics and nuances of equipping "bred" both cars different classes. Bora is not just a Golf with a trunk. Bora is an independent small sedan with very large ambitions. Therefore, he has a richer salon, and it is better equipped.

There is a Bora wagon. Frequency on the market: most buyers have not seen the difference between Bora Variant and Golf Variant. Those who wish to overpay behind the nameplates are a bit.

Four-wheel drive - old and very good tradition VW. Instead of visco-clutch on Golf 4 applied haldex coupling with electronic control. From this Golf 4Motion did not go like Subaru Impreza, but added to the predictability of the reactions. Wear system full drive not necessary. It is much more important that the rear suspension on all-wheel drive modifications independent and the design does not have anything in common with usual. Spare parts for it are more expensive, and with the search arise problems.

Golf GTI is another, no less successful tradition of VW. Machines performed by GTI are distinguished by sports suspension, seats and decor details. The car and goes, and looks great.

But the fastest Golf is Golf R32. V6 3.2, 240 hp These cuts are hidden 250 km / h and 6.5 s. up to 100 km / h "Cannon", from which VW ranges toward Alfa GTA and other "charged" ... There was another athlete. The one that at refueling is in one row with trucks. 150 hp With diesel 1896 cm3 - just achieved VW.

Nuance level
The choice of used car is always like racing. You can put on a proven leader, but the winnings will be small. And you can risk, put on a dark horse and win the condition. Astra G is the same dark horse, which brought Opel to victory. The previous model was not worse than VW Golf. The only problem was in the body: he rusted quickly. Astra G is no worse than VW Golf 4. and does not rust. Any questions? Yes there is. High quality Astra G is known not only to the narrow circle of workers Opel. Therefore, it costs the slightly cheaper Golf. Taking into account this factor, a clear picture is evoked. If you need a good European car with a spacious lounge and trunk, inexpensive in service and hardy in operation is Astra G. Especially with an 8-valve 1.6-liter motor. In addition, prices for original spare parts and services STO OPEL are lower than VW.

When the requirements for the car above ( powerful motor, high-quality interior trim) and the comfort of the rear passengers is not very important - this is Golf. By the way, climate control was installed on, only mechanical air conditioning. For someone it will be a big minus.

As for diesel engines, the choice is similar here. Astra G with 1.7-liter turbodiesel acts as an unpretentious workhorse. Golf TDI - as Street Raiser. Note that the cost of operating a powerful TDI above.

Of all the cars, which are present on the market, it is better to choose the official dealers purchased at one time in Russia. They have a mileage in most cases native, and the suspension is adapted.

And finally, about choosing a class. If someone is tormented by flour: Golf / Passat or Astra / Vectra, boldly take "younger". They are easier in design and deliver much less hassle in operation.
Successful purchase!

Polished to the gloss Perfectionism "Golf" looks provocative: the prospect of furnish the standard on its field is extremely motivated! And yet, perhaps, you should not try to surpass the ideal in all respects? What if you just offer a reasonable alternative, playing on protest sentiments of those who do not want to think stereotypes?

Sworn friends

Already the sixth "golf" makes the impression of a machine deprived of any flaws. Someone such refining bribes, but it may seem boring. Indeed, from generation to generation "Golf" carefully carries a valuable genetic code, improving it as successful, so cautiously. He will rather make himself respect in the process of dating, rather than will cause love at first sight: the production of spontaneous emotions at a distance is clearly not his path. "Volkswagen" prevents congenital restraint and pedantry, bordering the boring. It is not too interesting outdoor, but it is capable of surprising with his intellect and skills, which in it immediately will not suspect.

Astra "unequivocally bet on appearance: if we were bred for the design," Opel "would immediately dive themselves valuable points. However, the taste is the category of individual: someone loves to fall, and someone is a snooze daughter. And yet, I am sure, unlike the "golf" with his deliberately neutral appearance, "Astra" is trying to build eyes at the very moment of dating, Suts unforgettable minutes of passion. Even the 5-door hatchback looks very seductive, demonstrating the spectacular plastic sidewall, and the three-year GTC is at all trying to frankly seduce with appetizing forms. Beauty is a terrible force!

Kineette or Visual?

The interior of Golf at first glance seems simple, but only against the background of Astra. It would be more correct to call it concise. However, visual contact does not fully give the picture: to the touch "Volkswagen" seems much richer than on the view. The space is organized flawlessly: mutual understanding with the machine occurs at an intuitive level. The steering wheel, upholstered with silky skin, perfectly lies in his hands, information from the devices is read by peripheral vision, the climate control control does not cause questions. Everything, for which you will take, it seems perfect: buttons, keys, the twisters are decomposed in their legitimate places and are in combat readiness. You have not thought that you want to adjust or set up - and everything is done.

The manipulation with the basic audio system RCD-310 does not require thoughtful interface study, and even a more complex "head" RCD-510 allows you to work with it without prior to file instructions - especially since many questions removes the touchscreen display. You can only find a sound scene: it seems that the music goes on the left. However, it is easy to compensate for the balance setting.

But the most noticeable step towards the ideal has become driving seat. Perhaps high drivers and do not experience problems, but low to me (170 cm) it seemed that the chair was too high even in the lowest position, forcing it to move closer to the steering wheel. This feature of ergonomics is even more noticeable against the background of "Astra", the front chairs of which seemed more hospitable. In addition to the standard set of seats adjustments are supplemented with a moving segment of the pillow, which allows you to make it longer. Extremely useful bonus!

From the point of view of design, the interior "Opel" looks much more attractive and modern: it is easier to love his eyes than "Volkswagen". The quality of the finishes at first seems no worse than the "golf", but with a careful study of the gauge of delight weakens: in some way on the materials still saved. Yes, and ergonomics gives reasons for criticism: the devices are not so transparent for perception, the interface of the multimedia system is more free, and the melting of the buttons on the center console causes brain cancer. Finally, the "Astra" is noticeably worse than the visibility that the stupid triangular windows near the front and rear bed racks and a small back.

Beauty requires sacrifice

Obviously, "golf" was built not from the design, but from the function. It is enough to look at both cars in the profile to understand: "Volkswagen" is much more "Square" "Astra". Convenient access to the rear row of seats provide rear doors of a more correct shape that form a wide opening. The sofa does not hide behind the head of the body, and it minimizes the risk to hit the head during the landing. In the center of the rear row, you can organize an armrest, pulling it out of the back; And his kinematics is such that he keeps pretty high, not forcing the elbow to him. But this is the option.

By default, the armrest does not have "Astra". Under the disappearance on the "Opel" sofa resembles "Volkswagen", but inferior to him by the stock of space in the field of legs. Loses "Astra" and for the convenience of planting: the lowered window line had a lowered rear door, and the sofa back was hidden behind the massive pole.

Addition with subtraction

In the basic configuration "Golf" is deprived of two unequal parts of the sofa, it is possible to add it only entirely. But for the surcharge, he becomes such as it should be in a practical hatchback, and also grows as a ski hatch. But if the rear row is completely left at the disposal of passengers, the truck from Volkswagen will be mediocre: the volume of the trunk is very modest.

Astra copes better with the carriage of goods. She has not only more spacious trunkBut the back of the sofa is laid out even in the basic version. For a surcharge, you can get the armrest with the hatch - however, the Ski LAZ itself will be noticeably less than that of Golf. But as an Opel option, the Flex Flo Fleet Organizer is proposed, allowing you to organize underground in the trunk, experimenting with the floor level. And this is good.

Blow stronger!

Despite the fact that in the price lists of both "Germans" appear hopeless power units, cars with turbomotors look most attractive. The optimal "golf" is a modification of 1,4TSI, which can be equipped with both "mechanics" and "machine". The engine was able to fame: despite the modest 122 forces, it is easily lucky even relatively heavy "Passat" and "Tiguan", and with a light "golf" and at all copes playing! "Volkswagen" picks up the speed of the bastard - and it does not matter, with which a box you have to work a motor: to control overclocking is equally pleasant both on machines with "mechanics" and on "automated" versions with a "robot" DSG. The engine is smooth, and the thrust is uniformly smeared throughout the range of revolutions - what is needed in the city! More modest aggregates advise not at night: 105-strong 1,2tsi is not very cheaper, and with even more weak engines "Golf" thoroughly loss in dynamics.

Astra also begins with undead engines, but blossoms only with a 1,4-liter turbo capacity of 140 forces. True, having a horse advantage over "Volkswagen", such a "Opel" is not so fun: it pulls worse from the bottom, and it starts to be worse forces only when it is no longer necessary. Yes, and the 6-speed ACP takes MZD for its services. Even the 180-strong version of "1.6-turbo" feels no better than 1,4-liter opponent! "Mechanical" modifications accelerates more, but "Volkswagen" leaves a more pleasant impression: it sells its own potential much higher.

Less doors - more fun

The Golf Chassis is one of the best (if not the best) in the classroom: this is confirmed by the first turns. The steering wheel is extremely informative, the rolls are moderate, and the tires are tightly lipped to the asphalt, which seems like the hatchback and it will easily erupt on the sheer wall. Confidence in the car grows in proportion to speed. The larger digits refuse the speedometer arrow, the more you penetrate the possibilities of the machine: "Volkswagen" holds the straight and absolutely reliable in turns. Brakes are ideal: the pedal is sensitive, but tough; A pressure management in the system does not move the pedal, but by pressing the power. Super!

Astra leaves not so solid impression. Brake pedal is unnecessarily mobile: on the background of "golf" its move seems too much. However, it was in no way affected by the efficiency of the system - it is simply necessary to peck into the character of a slowdown. But the too lightweight and empty steering wheel - this is a more serious disadvantage: in turn, the trajectory has to grope. The limit features of the "Opel" are not worse than the "Volkswagen", but it is possible to understand this, only thoroughly drunk in the car - while Golf immediately exposes its charms. In any case, Astra is not so clearly seeking to divide the joy of driving with the driver.

But this is true only with respect to the 5-door hatchback. The spectacular three-door GTC goes quite differently! The reason lies in the front suspension "hyper-strata", in which the swivel fists rotate separately from the swinging "candles", allowing you to get rid of power infringement. The steering wheel at GTC is also light, but much more accurate and informative than the usual "Astra". And therefore the 3-door hatch fell no worse than the "golf".

Flying gait

"Volkswagen" is assembled with precision thoroughness and in motion does not make a single outsider sound. Even the voice of the motor, gradually breaking through the thickets of noise insulation, broadcasts exclusively in the case and does not irritate the hearing. But only as long as the wheels are even asphalt. The road is spoiled, and the car begins to be nervous, and the rigid buildings of the holes and the tram rails come to the salon through a plaintive crossing of the suspension, which deviations from the norm are clearly not happy. Overview The car passes hard, forcing thoroughly to drop the speed in front of the potholes.

"Opel" behaves a lot of restraint: you won't be afraid by broken asphalt. Astra is more gently rolled through most of the road artifacts and does not annoy comments from the suspension. The glamorous version of the GTC, which is larger shoes, also very steadyly perceives the burden of our roads: even being a shift in custom 19-inch "lapties" three-time demonstrates better smoothness than "golf" on 17-inch wheels.

Assets and liabilities

Experts "EuroNCAP" in 2009 safely broke and "golf", and "Astra": both cars received five stars. Nevertheless, in relation to our reality there are several important nuances. In any of the "golfs" you will find seven airbags: frontal, side, window plus airbag for drivers' knees. In addition, you can add a couple of lateral pillows for the rear passengers in Volkswagen.

Astra default offers only four pillows (front and side), and inflatable "curtains" cost an additional 9500 rubles - inexpensive, but still. But "Opel" even in the basic versions added a dynamic stabilization system, while Volkswagen for ESP requires 22,710 rubles.

It is appropriate to mention that representatives of EuroNCAP twice awarded Opel for innovation twice, noting the recognition system of the Opel-ah road signs and the AFL adaptive light that can be ordered in Russia.

Hum of turbines, sniffing sleep

This year, "folk motorists" brought out of the circulation "Golf" with a sequel hopeless motor of 1.4 liters; And now the price for a three-year engine with a 1.6 engine (102 liters) in the Trendline configuration begins with a mark of 603,000 rubles - for three thousand more than the most accessible "Astra" performed by Essenshi with a 1.4-liter engine With a capacity of 101 liters. from. In this golf, in addition to the above-mentioned security tools, there are front electric windows, heated mirrors with electric drive, central locking with Du. The default conditioner is only the versions with tSI engines and TDI, and separately costs 43 240 rubles. For the 5-door body should be supplemented with 22,850 casual. In general, due to poverty, such a car will only be a pale shadow of this Golf.

Machines with turbogides begin from 616 thousand per 1,2tsi (85 l. P.), And with an optimal engine of 1,4TSI "Golf" will cost 676 thousand on the "hand". DSG should pay another 66,000 rubles, which is rather immodestly. But still you will have to recruit the expensive options of the piece: rear doors (22 850), ESP (22 710), multifunctional display (2000), audio system (7020), "fog" (6730), steering wheel with "music control buttons" (10 860 ) - This is at least. If you add everything, we get "golf-1,4tsi-dsg" for 814,170 rubles.

Similarly, equipped with "Astra" with a 140-strong turbo engine and "machine" in the configuration "Endzhoy" will cost 763,900 rubles. Significant difference! And if you set the goal to purchase the cheapest car for 600 thousand, then it will be quite suitable for life: it is supposed to be air conditioning and "music".

The spectacular GTC is 12,900 rubles cheaper than the five-year, and it can be taken with a 140-strong undead engine of 1.8 liters. In addition, GTC has 1.4 (140 forces) turbosters (140 forces) and 1.6 (180 forces) on the "hand", while on the usual hatchback to these power units to the load "AUTOMATI".

Once Volkswagen Golf. He was an unconditional leader in his class, and the rivals tried to imitate him in every way. But today the market situation is completely different. Modern models Volkswagen is not so reliable, and competitors are clearly approaching. This is clearly visible on the example of the comparison.

Starting

Both cars are assembled quite carefully, but the individual elements of the golf are adjacent more accurately. In addition, its innovative door allows, in case of damage to remove the external lifting for bodywork, which allows to eliminate traces of serious blows. However, this repair is more expensive and complex. Later in the new models Volkswagen moved away from such a solution.

In the crash tests both cars earned five stars, but a detailed comparison of individual items indicates the minimum advantage of Astra.

Astra, like Golf, is carefully protected from corrosion. Weak Opel Place Fragment of the Budget Rear Door under the Chrome Plank. In the golf traces of rust sometimes you can detect on the doors around the windows and on the racks, in the places of touch the door seal.

In terms of the indoor space, a little better is a golf - it provides more space for the rear passengers. The cargo opening of the 5-door Astra is slightly less than that of the golf, but the trunk is more capacious: 380 liters vs 350 l at VW.

The quality of the interior is controversial. The front panel of Astra does not greatly admire with his own species and, unfortunately, in most copies creaks. After a small upgrade in 2007, the quality has improved and finishing versions of Elegance, Cosmo and Sport has already deserved respect. At first glance, inside golf - exemplary: excellent build quality and good materials. But if you look around - it is not perfect. On the power windows and door handles control buttons, rubberized coating. Well-equipped asters prevail in the sale ads. Golfs tend to have more modest equipment, but cost more.

Taking into account all the "for" and "against", in the first round, it is difficult to determine the obvious winner. Both cars deserve a draw.

Score for Astra

Opel Astra has a very simple suspension: on the front axle system MacPherson, to the back - torsion beam. In the front levers, the ball and silent blocks can be changed separately. There is almost nothing to break in the back of the beam. All points over "and" puts the big ground clearance. Thanks to all this advantages, Astra is ideal for our terrible roads. The service life of the ball and other connecting elements is not too big, but the replacement of them is simple and cheap. The only exception is sports asters with IDS + system, i.e. With shock absorbers of adjustable stiffness. Replaysters are absent, and the cost of original parts is estimated by tens of thousands of rubles. But, fortunately, this is headache only owners of sports versions. The rest can sleep well.

The front pendant of the golf also does not cause any serious problems. Rear installed multi-dimensional suspension. Its construction is quite strong, but used copies of the initial production period will most likely require the suspension to put the suspension, for which it might take about 6,000 to 7,000 rubles.


Golf is equipped with an electric steering amplifier, Astra - electro-hydraulic. Both systems are quite reliable, but in the event of unforeseen faults, a wallet can be empty by 10,000 rubles.

In comparison, the chassis wins Astra.

Motorized dilemma

The line of power aggregates of the golf is impressive by their abundance. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of available engines have a modern and advanced design requiring increased expenses on the maintenance and repair. Under the notation of FSI and TSI hides the system of direct gasoline injection. For motorists who read with expenses, only three engines can be recommended: an immortal gasoline 1.6-liter 8-valve unit, diesel 1.9 TDI (though it works too loud) and, in extreme cases, a gasoline 1.4-liter 16-valve motor (nothing is particularly impressive, but it does not bother with problems).


Astra engines line also makes an impression, but here the overwhelming majority of motors can be taken into account. A good choice will be turbodiesel borrowed from Fiat - 1.9 CDTI: powerful, economical and quite reliable. 1.7 CDTI ISUZU development is not ideal, but many owners are still satisfied with them. 1.3 CDTI is also borrowed from Fiat: it consumes very little fuel, but much better coofers with easier Corsa.

Note: Most diesel opels have a solid particle filter. Its presence can be determined by the sticker on the central rack from the passenger side. If a value of 0.5 is displayed in the last string of characters - it means the filter is present. If 1.2 and more - it means there is no. Due to the fact that the filters on opel models Create a lot of problems when operating, some drivers are removed.


Opel Astra gasoline engines are famous for high fuel consumption, medium performance and good oil appetite. However, they do not deliver serious problems. Typical malfunctions are associated with valve recycling of exhaust gases EGR, throttle valve and oil leakage. After restyling, the manufacturer abandoned the use of valve hydraulic components (concerns strong versions of 1.6 and 1.8 liters). You can check this by decryping the VIN number.

At this comparative stage, Astra is defeated, although it is worth recognizing that two good golf engines (1.6 8V and 1.9 TDI) are quite enough.

Question price

And so we approached the most important issue - the price. Astra is definitely cheaper. Is it worth overpaying? Finally, the best choice It will become more expensive Golf with a unpretentious and durable 8-valve 1.6-liter gasoline engine.

Preferring diesel, it is better to cross through stereotypes and pick up Astra 1.9 CDTI without squeeze filter. This will be a well-equipped car, as a rule, in a much better condition than comparable golf.


Summary

Opel Astra is less perfect in technical terms than Volkswagen Golf. Nevertheless, she is recognized as the winner. Astra is cheaper and requires less operational cost. Drivers, often moving on broken roads, will have to taste her hardy suspension. In addition, during the trips, they will appreciate its escaped, tracked and not very noisy 1.9-liter diesel.

Volkswagen Golf V (2003-2008)


History of the model

2003 - Presentation

2004 - the appearance of version 4motion

2005 - Golf Plus

2006 - Crossgolf.

2007 - Golf Combi

:

Defects of block heads and nozzles in engines 2.0 TDI

Wearing the control system of the position of blades in turbocharger with variable geometry

Problems with the timing chain and the coolant pump in 1.4 TSI

Problems with valve recycling system of exhaust gases EGR

Premature wear of the two-mask flywheel

Advantages:

Reliability

Small loss of value

Availability of a large number of diverse spare parts

Minuses :

High Cost Service Cost FSI, TSI and 2.0 TDI PD

Scooty basic equipment

Engines

Most preferred old, time-tested engines - gasoline 8-valve 1.6 l with a capacity of 102 hp And Diesel 1.9 TDI with 105 hp pump-nozzles. The 1.4-liter 16-valve gasoline engine is too weak, while others require large maintenance costs. Version with 2.0 TDI PD is not recommended.


Specifications Volkswagen Golf V (2003-2008)

Version

1.4 16V

1.6 8V.

1.9 TDI

2.0 TDI

Engine

petrol

petrol

turbodiesel

turbodiesel

Working volume

1390 cm3

1595 cm3

1896 cm3

1968 cm3

R4 / 16.

R 4/8.

R 4/8.

R4 / 8 or 16

Maximum power

80 hp

102 hp

105 hp

140 hp

Maximum torque

132 Nm

148 Nm

250 nm

320 nm

Dynamics

Maximum speed

166 km / h

184 km / h

187 km / h

205 km / h

Acceleration 0-100 km / h

13.9 seconds

11.4 seconds

11.3 seconds

9.3 sec

Opel Astra III (2004-2012)


History of model:

2004 - Presentation

2006 - TWINTOP convertible

2008 - Sedan version

Typical problems and malfunctions:

Wear dampers in the intake manifold of diesel 1.9 CDTI. The cost of the new collector is about 9000 rubles.

Renouncement eGR systems - concerns gasoline and diesel engines

CIM module malfunction

Elevated oil consumption engines 1.6 and 1.8 liters

Advantages:

Large selection of cars on the market

Very attractive prices

Wide gamma engines

Good accessibility spare parts

Minuses :

The average reliability of gasoline engines

Slightly worse corrosion protection than Volkswagen Golf

Many cars from corporate park

Engines

Gasoline engines are not impressive not by productivity not fuel consumption. After restyling, the manufacturer abandoned the valve gap hydrocompators. Diesel motors are good, especially 1.9 CDTI. Note - Among diesel versions, solid particle filter occurs.


Specifications Opel Astra III (2004-2012)

Version

1.4 T P.

1.6 T P.

1.7 CDTI

1.9 CDTI

Engine

petrol

petrol

turbodiesel

turbodiesel

Working volume

1364 cm3

1598 cm3

1686 cm3

1910 cm3

Cylinders / Valve Location

R4 / 16.

R4 / 16.

R4 / 16.

R 4/8.

Maximum power

90 hp

115 hp

110 hp

120 hp

Maximum torque

125 Nm

155 nm

260 Nm

280 Nm

Dynamics

Maximum speed

178 km / h

191 km / h

185 km / h

194 km / h

Acceleration 0-100 km / h

13.7 seconds

11.7 seconds

11.6 seconds

10.5 seconds

Middle fuel consumption in l / 100 km

Volkswagen Golf is a real legend, because this model For almost four decades, it is the most sought-after from the entire range of the German concern. However, other automakers do not want to stay in Outsiders, everyone makes efforts to create a serious competition to this hatchback, someone it must be recognized, and someone, such as Opel Astra, luck smiles more. But what car is better?

Let's start, perhaps, with an assessment of the appearance of both kars. Undoubtedly, in the Golf exterior, old familiar features, the conservatism of lines and forms, strict optics, is, of course, a raid of modernity, but is too insignificant. What you can not say about Opel Astra, this car can be called the most stylish in its class - bizarre forms, original headlights, smooth lines and aesthetics in every detail. Of course, the appearance objectively is objectively quite difficult, so we admit, in our opinion, Opel Astra looks pretty.

Now it's time to look into the salon and an expert look to take the interior Hatchbacks arriving to us from Germany. We first sit down in the salon Volkswagen, immediately it is worth noting a comfortable fit and high-quality finish materials, the interior and ergonomics are not deprived, there is also special attention to the space that gives additional comfort.

The interior of Opel Astra will also delight comfortably, magnificent finishing and quality of materials. Not devoid of the interior and modern details, it is now about chrome inserts. And of course ergonomics - at the height.

Now the most interesting, then what hides under the hood, internal potential that cars demonstrate only selected.

The Volkswagen Golf engine line includes three types of engines: 85- and 105-strong 1.2 liters, as well as 1,4-liter 122 hp. Transmissions The manufacturer also offers three: 5- and 6-speed mechanical and 7 --Diapan machine.

Opel Astra is available again with three types of engines: 140-strong 1.4 liter volume, as well as 1,6-liter power 115 hp and 180 hp. The choice of transmissions is not so great - the buyer can purchase this model as with a 5-speed mechanical box Switching gear and with 6-speed automatic.

Naturally, it is necessary to admit that Opel Astra not only outside looks more sporting in comparison with GOLF, but also inside, since it dynamic characteristics Excellent parameters of this volkswagen models factor of. Therefore, if you like sports and speed, then you will like Opel, and the conservative warehouse can evaluate all the advantages of Golf, who appreciates the comfort and comfort.

It will not be superfluous that Opel Astra in the basic configuration costs somewhat more expensive than Volkswagen Golf In a similar version - 649,900 rubles against 599,000 rubles.

Of course, we only gave dry facts of Volkswagen Golf and Opel Astra, put subjective assessments, naturally, the choice of best to do to you!

© 2021 Bugulma-lada.Ru - Portal for car owners