Krash test daster new. Renault Duster crash tests according to EUROncap. Passengers - children

Content

2015 year for Renault Duster. It did not bring significant security improvements compared to 2011 when the first crash test was held. How many stars he got then for the same amount was assessed and his a new version: 3 stars. This is not a high assessment, and not fail.

Video dough Renault. Duster is not impressive. But having remembered about his democratic, thanks to which he is out of competition, you can advise the drivers to be more attentively behind the wheel of this car and carefully observe the speed mode.

Protect adults

According to the results of the test, the Duster demonstrated the protection of adult passengers on the Middle level. So, the breast cell of the driver and the passenger sitting ahead turned out to be. During the front of the front, the pressure rendered on the chest was significant, including due to seat belts. Heavy driver injuries are dangerous Torpedo design. Knees, legs and other organs are not at risk. But the experts reduced the safety assessment for the luggage door door open during the stern strike.

Side strike And at all turned out to be treaty. The reason for this is the driver's door opening when hitting the Block. In the event of a collision with a static object with lateral slides, the chest, which is atypically for the SUV. Feed collision showed the risk of spinal injuries in the area of \u200b\u200bthe cervical. Almost in any case, the Duster, due to the insufficient rigidity of the case, injures the ribs sitting ahead of passengers.

Protection of children

Due to the fact that the safety of small passengers in Renault Duster was slightly higher than adultsThe assessment of the commission has increased. So, children under one and a half years are protected on high level subject to the use of children's chairs. In the rear seat, the displacement of the child's body was registered older than three years with frontal impact, but it was as not dangerous. However, on the front seat of children, older than three years experts do not advise experts: there is no alarm in the car, indicating when the front airbag is disabled, which means the driver is not always aware of the degree of child's security.

The edge of the hood Renault Duster is pretty acute and hard, from here high risk injury for pedestrians in a collision. Especially potentially feel the legs and the pelvis area. And may also seriously suffer a head of a pedestrian child. Unfortunately, call Duster safe for hiking participants road It is impossible to name.

Photo Crash Dough Renault Duster without airbags

As a result, the crash test, the specialists did not assign a single star (in terms of protecting adult passengers). However, nevertheless, despite the terrible results, the car received 2 stars for protection rear passengerwhich is in the children's chair (child).

Video crash test Renault Duster without airbags

Secretary General Global NCAP David Ward commented on the terrible results of Renault Duster crash tests:

"We are concerned that during the road safety of the road, which is carried out under the auspices of the UN, we are again faced with zero security assessments. modern carAs a result of crash test.
It is worth noting that Renault produces DUSTER SUV and sells it in many world markets. We hope that only the Indian versions have disgusting security. "

It is worth noting that after the catastrophic result of the Renault Duster crash test, the French automaker asked the Global NCAP to test another version of the SUV, which is equipped with a safety cushion for the driver.

As a result, the SUV received 3 stars for the level of security for passengers and the driver.

Renault Duster Crash With Driver Airbag

But, despite the fact that the second crash test of the car with airbags received 3 stars, the specialists decided to further explore Renault Duster, spending tests of various versions of the SUV available for purchase in various world markets.

It is necessary to understand how dangerous configurations are sold in which markets that the driver and passengers protect the driver.

Photo Renault Duster crash test with a driver's pillow

The most interesting thing is that two years ago Duster, supplied to the Latin American market, passed a similar crash test in which he received 4 stars of security.

Naturally, the difference in the results of the SUV security is associated with car safety pillows. Since the Renault Duster is not equipped with airbags in the Indian basic version, then the machine cannot provide the driver and passengers with a normal level of security.

* Results of the Renault Duster SUV test dough without airbags

According to the Global NCAP Renault Duster specialists in general does not deserve a single star, even despite the 3rd and 4 "star" assessments of cars presented in some foreign markets.

The thing is that Renault Duster should not be sold in the Indian market without airbag even in the basic configuration. So that renault. It is worth reconsidering their policies. Otherwise duster model Get zero assessments in all markets.

* Results of the Renault Duster SUV test test with the driver's airbag

The basic version of the Renault Duster without airbag available on the Indian market has become another car that could not receive a single security star according to the result of crash tests conducted by Global NCAP.

The end of this year was very saturated for the organization EURO NCAP: the results of the previous series of crash tests were published only two weeks ago - and now the new portion of the victims. This time, fifteen car models were attended by the tests, which can be divided into two groups - newcomers and older markets.

Among the seven new products, four cars earned the maximum five stars: these are Liftbacks (part of the results was taken from the Donor sedan to the fifth series) and, medium-sized crossover and compact parckarter. "Five" awarded the crossover, which in Europe occupies the same niche as Rio X-Line In Russia, however there are two nuances. First, the maximum assessment is allowed only by the security package (it includes automatic braking systems and tracking tracking systems), while without it only three stars. And secondly, the tests of the walls were not really conducted! Since this Patcher on the power structure of the body and equipment repeats, then Euro NCAP experts simply appropriated the assessment of the original hatchback.

For us, it is much more interesting for the test results of the crossover, because after a half or two years old this model will appear in Russia under the brand Renault and will inevitably repeat the market success of the predecessor. Alas, in the current EURO NCAP rating, the new Duster has only been awarded three stars, although in the level of security it has surpassed the previous model. Loads on the front sedimons with a shock shot about the frozen barrier are reduced (but still superior to an absolutely safe threshold), the punch of the pillar does not threaten the driver with fatal injuries. Although after the frontal collision with the wall at a speed of 50 km / h, which is more demanding of the car retaining systems, the front seasons of the Duster risk their heads: the overload is high. And the seats are still not importantly protected from the whip injuries at the bottom of the back. Pedestrian safety is improved, but the main reason why Duster did not score more than three stars - the absence of electronic assistants. However, a little later.

Another three-star newcomer - Chinese compact crossover who entered the UK market. His passive safety is not exemplary, and the most failed positions are the same as Duster: a frontal blow to a unintedeable wall and driving from behind. And he also has no electronic helpers.

The same circumstance became the main stumbling block for the majority of old-timers on the way to a high security rating.

The promise of Euro NCAP organization is simple: cars that have entered the market a few years ago, not as safe as new. Of the eight cars, which are not sold in Europe and now visited Euro NCAP tests, five stars were able to earn only recently updated hatchback. Passive safety he has impaired (load on legs and breasts of seds exceed the threshold of injury), but there are systems of automatic braking and marking tracking.

Four stars earned even more compact Toyota Aygo hatchback. In his list of options, there is a cherished electronics (without it a final assessment and at all three-star), but he fell asleep on the frontal blow to the wall: the load on the chest and the rear passenger's head turned out to be proceedable - serious injuries are guaranteed.

And now the most interesting. Hatchbacks, and Opel Karl, as well as the compacttwan (its assessment was assigned by the machine and the short version without the Grand console) as a whole showed a sediment protection level close to Aygo: an assessment for passive safe - from 61 to 76%. But modern electronic helpers for automatic braking and road marking controls are not allowed even for surcharge. Therefore, only three euro NCAP stars.

Well, the most resonant became the crash test of the hatchback. The choice of this model seems strange: these car debuted back in 2005, and already in this December they were going to remove it from production, but at the insistence of the trade union extended the deadline for July 2018 to at least download the Fiatovsky factory in Melfi. Twelve years ago, Grande Punto became the first model of class B + with a five-star EURO NCAP rating, but now the organization said that now Punto became also the first in the history of a car that did not receive a single star! Paradox?

Of course, over the past twelve years, the NCAP euro norms were stricter, and Punto himself did not better. If in 2005 the hatchback with six airbags for the front crash test with the overlap earned 13.6 points out of 16, and for two side shocks - the maximum 18 points, now the basic Punto only with two pillows has six eight points per front crash - Sest and 6.7 points out of 16 per side (the blow to the pillar was not conducted due to the lack of security curtains). The loads on the saddles are great, but even with the results of Fiat Punto could scrape two stars out of five. If non-notorious electronic helpers: the Italian hatchback does not even have non-unscheduled belts, not to mention the system of autotorrow. Therefore, an assessment for preventive security is 0 points. And if at least one of the disciplines, the car receives a "Barc", then, according to the current EURO NCAP rules, all the stars are burned.

Is such a system of values \u200b\u200bwith an emphasis on electronic assistants? Even in Europe itself, EURO NCAP is increasingly reproaches that the selected test of tightening tests is not entirely correct. In this regard, an example of the American Insurance Institute of Road Security IIHS, which in 2012 introduced: 25% of the front instead of the usual 40%. In this case, the blow most often accounted for by the spar, the main power absorbing element. Moreover, the Americans beat cars not only by the driver's, but in some cases and the passenger side of the front. In such a test, a lot of famous models was convicted, and manufacturers began to take into account such a test when designing new machines. The benefit from this may be greater than from electronic assistants. What, of course, does not cancel the introduction of the latter.

Next year, the Euro NCAP Committee promises to submit new, even more stringent test rules. And what approach is more impressed to you: European, with an emphasis on the assisting electronics, or American, with tightening the crash tests?

The new generation of Duster did not have time to appear on the roads of Europe, and he was already able to experience it for strength. Naturally the old body structure of the body on the platform "B0" although it became known as Global Access Renault, but the strength did not add it. Today we offer to watch two videos at once. Crash test of the first and second generation of crossover.

Naturally in Europe, where Renault Duster is sold under the grade of Vacation, the test was carried out with Dacia Duster, which is not much different from Renault Duster. To begin with, remember the first test of 2011, when the test passed the first generation crossover. We watch the video.

As a result, quite weak indicators and only 3 stars. Video is quite terrible. The body creates, as if he was from foil.

What changed in the second generation daster, if he even got 3 stars with a new body? You think the reinforcement of the supporting structure was not, most likely the manufacturer took everything weak spots And most of the deformation zones processed. But do not forget that for so many years and safety requirements have become more rigid. Therefore, the breakthrough did not happen, the same 3 stars by Euro NCAP. We look more fresher video.

True, this time the picture is not so terrible. All the same abundance of airbags and electronic systems Make a little safer car.

A detailed report on tests naturally can be found on the site www.euroncap.com, and specifically on this page www.euroncap.com/en/results/dacia/duster/29898
There is also a reference to the PDF file, where it is beautiful, with multi-colored pictures, everything is described and shown.

It is a pity that I could not withdraw the level of security at least 4 stars. Therefore, it's impossible to wait for a new generation from the budget crossover.

The European Committee for EURO NCAP's independent crash tests has explored RENAULT DUSTER to active and passive security And only three stars gave a car. What, in essence, is almost a failure. EURO NCAP requirements are very high. Suffice it to say that since 2010, the course sustainability system must be included in basic complete set car.

The crash tests carried out by the same organization showed that if for passengers, including children, the safety of the car is at the level between the school triple and the four, then pedestrians at the unit level. That is, having freezing with the emblem Renault Duster, the pedestrian should be in rapid legs.

And if seriously, the crash test Renault Duster showed, first of all developers Renault Duster, directions for improvements, and users hidden potential hazards, which are desirable to avoid.

Safety inside the car

The safety of adult passengers Renault Duster corresponds to 74%. Front punch is dangerous for both the driver and the passenger. Too large pressure on the chest, even despite pillows and belts. But the legs at the front mannequins were not injured. During the strike, the fifth door opened, and this is minus. Nevertheless, in this test, Duster earned 11 points, which is a solid three on the five-point system. The same story with a chest when simulating a collision with a pillar, and the rating "bad" is 6 points.

A little worse than another task was made, in which the side collision with the car was simulated. During the strike from the passenger side, the driver opened the door, and this seriously increases the risk of injury - score 7.2 of the score.

But the worst thing is the case at the race behind. In this case, the high probability of obtaining a serious injury of cervical vertebrae. Score 2.5 points.

Children protected a little better, and in this category Duster earned 78%. This is the maximum evaluation for the duster.

And the maximum assessment by age groups was transported by the carriage of the smallest passengers, under the age of one and a half years - 18 points. The test passed with a mannequin of a child sitting in a children's car chairLocated rear seat. With a frontal collision, the mannequin was held in its place. A mannequin, imitating a child of three years, also stayed in a chair, but the body was significantly shifted forward, so the assessment was reduced to 17 points.

In the car it turns off the operation of the airbag, so baby chair You can install on front seat Against the move of the car.

There is only one nuance, it is impossible to determine the state of activity of the pillow. Information about this is not displayed on the dashboard.

Safety surrounding

Do not love Renault Duster pedestrians, therefore rating 28% and, accordingly, a complete failure in this category. The bumper and the front edge of the hood feet feet pedestrian. I would like to see which car does not cripple. But Duster, apparently, especially cruel. Also, Duster's body in a collision with a person can cause severe head injury. The test results were estimated at 10 points.

All means active security Renault. DUSTER consists in a single service reporting on an unused belt. And Duster deservedly received an almost lowest rating - 2 points. Total assessment for active safety - 29 points. The estimate was slightly pulled up side airbags for all crew members. Although there are no them in the basic version, and the installation costs a lot of money.

Actually, there is no need to panic, in some cars, boldly making russian roads, the only security agent is the torpedo icon. In addition, the same assessment has Mersedes Benz Citan Combi, and Jeep COMPASS. And worse, received 2 stars.

What outcome

Interestingly, Renault Clio was declared the most safe car of the year. No wonder Duster is not sold in Europe, and Klio in Russia. But, given the budget of the car, total assessment "Satisfactory" is not so bad. Moreover, the developers of Renault Duster, apparently, having received a lesson, have already reported that the 2017 model will be equipped with the most modern security systems and driver's computer assistants.