Compare Mazda C7 favor 4 fourth generation. What car is better: Mazda or Toyota. Motors, gearboxes and their capabilities

Can the novelty of the market impose a competing for the best-selling car in the classroom?

Gabarites, mm.

4550x1840x1680

Wheel base, mm

Diameter of reversal, m

Road clearance, mm

The volume of the trunk, l

Curb weight, kg

engine's type

gasoline L4.

Working volume, cube. cm

Max. Power, hp / rpm

Max. Moment, nm / rpm

Transmission

6-Range Automatic

Front tires / rear

Max. Speed, km / h

Acceleration time 0-100 km / h, with

Volume of tank, l

Only in comparison can be understood what is better, the same rule concerns cars. In this article we compare two crossovers of Japanese origin. Why Toyota and Mazda are so often compared? The answer is simple, everything is associated with the fact that the pricing on cars in two companies will be approximately the same, so in case manufacturers produce cars of one class, then why not compare them.

Toyota and Mazda - long-standing Russians of Russians

Package and prices Mazda CX 5 and Toyota RAV4

First, let's talk about the equipment of the car. Immediately striking the fact that Toyota on his SUV delivers only two types of engines to our market. The first one is two-liter petrol aggregate on 146 forces, and 2.5 liter also gasoline block for 180 forces. Unfortunately, diesel versions on the territory of Russia are not available. But the Mazda company to its customers is ready to offer a little more.

To speak more specifically, versions with gasoline engines are available on sale, one with a volume of 2 liters, the second - 2.5. It is worth noting that gasoline versions of motors in Mazda are a little more powerful than competitors. Japanese car brand Our market supplies one diesel engine with a volume of 2.2 liters, issuing 175 hp So at a minimum of Mazd's motors choosing a victory unambiguously.

How to save the battery in winter and properly operate it - see here.

Also, you will learn about how to drag the car's ceiling with your own hands.

However, in terms of technical and electronic equipment, Toyota immediately breaks forward. Rav4 is equipped with xenon optics, the cars also have a blocking of an electronic coupling, which moves the torque to the rear axle, and has the ability to complete the stabilization.

Appearance

If it comes to appearance Toyota RAV4 2016, then before the design of this model was positioned as a female parckarter. Because of this, many were skeptical throughout the life of the crossover. However, today Toyota designers decided to fix this problem. The car tried to add more stringent forms and lines. This work was made in order to attract and male audience, but the exterior of the car came out quite controversial. Perhaps the designers too stretched the front of the car, namely the bumper, because of which it seems that the headlights are very planted.

As for the design of Mazda, it can be noted that it was CX-5 who became the first car of the company that embodied the new design philosophy. From the very first sight of this SUV, more aggressive body lines are seen from what the impression is that the car does not only look more pronounced, but also more "drive." What is only one squirrel headlights? However, there is one disadvantage, due to their rapid forms, the car seems smaller and lower compared to the competitor.

Summing up in appearance, you can say one thing, a brighter appearance has a Mazda car. It will suit more for a young man, while the buyer will receive a stylish design and all the same capabilities in terms of capacity. Rav4 In turn, it is more suitable for quiet drivers, appreciating the comfort and space of the car.

Salon Mazda CX 5 2016 and Toyota RAV4 2016

Car salons are drastically learned. Mazda has a more laconic interior decoration, without unnecessary parts and forms. However, the layout of the front panel itself is very similar to the decision of the German company, namely BMW. The multimedia screen in the Mazda is slightly drowning in the torpedo itself, which protects it from the glare, the interface itself is quite clear, but today it is slightly outdated.

In RAV4, a completely different story. Designers decided to establish an angular front panel, which makes an impression of massiveness and reliability. However, no matter how bold there was no solution in the design of the panel itself, there are some details that are clearly lacking quality. For example, the entire torpedo is made of hard plastic, as well as the quality of the buttons and other parts of the front part leaves much to be desired.

Decoring devices in Rav4 looks weak, such a feeling that the design borrowed a budget car in the class below. And Mazda decoration dashboard Much more interesting and looks up with the times.

Landing behind the wheel in the car is just as much different. In Rav4, the seats are provided not only for a thin bundle of the driver and passengers, but also under the larger type of people, that is why Toyota will fit better in terms of comfort for more mature people. In CX-5, the cabin and seats are more compact, the seats have a more pronounced side support. Therefore, this choice is suitable for young people or middle-aged people.

From the point of view of ergonomic, Toyota again wins, the designers have placed more different shelves and cases for various items. Mazda in turn in this issue is more modest.

If you transfer to the rear row, you can immediately notice that due to the fact that the RAV-4 doors are larger, landing back will be more comfortable. Also, the rear row at Toyota has great spacing compared to Mazda.

Driving and test drives

If you compare both cars in motion, the driver will immediately notice the difference of car ideologies. Mazda will be faster and dynamic, while the fuel consumption will also be modest. The car is very confident feeling in urban conditions and is always ready for active ride. The suspension works fine, the car itself is less than twisted on turns, which is why more accurate controls. Also informative will be not only the gas pedal, but also the brakes along with the wheel. What is not enough cars in case of version with automatic gearboxSo it is stealing petals, it would add more emotions to the driver in the active ride mode. Toyota, in turn, is a bit hard, in the dynamics of overclocking up to 60 km per hour, there will be no difference compared to CX-5, but if we talk about higher speeds, then the car in this case is visiting the speed is very lazy. Passing turn is accompanied by rolls, from which the speed on such devias will be lower. But this is all only in urban conditions. If you go on a light off-road, then RAV4 will look a solid competitor. The off-road potential of Toyota is significantly higher than that of Mazda, so overcoming any obstacles will be easier to go to RAV4

Results of comparison

It is impossible to call some of the two cars presented better or worse. Manufacturers of these crossovers approached the issue of creating their cars completely from different positions. On the one hand, it seems Mazda is much more attractive and more dynamic, on the other - RAV4 is more spacious roomy and has off-road potential. And that is why the target audience of two parkettails will be different. In the case of CX-5, its buyers will definitely young people who are important style and emotions from driving. And buyers of Toyota will be family people above middle age, which primarily practicality is important in use.

procrossover.ru.

Comparison of Mazda CX-5 and Toyota RAV4 - Logbook MAZDA CX-5 MOBY-DICK 2017 on DRIVE2

Having traveled a month on the new Mazda CX-5 a certain opinion about the car was formed. Now you can try it objectively, comparing with my previous Toyota RAV4. Cars of the same class are direct competitors, because the comparison is even more interesting.

Compared: -Toyota RAV4 IV 2.0 AWD MultiDrive 2014 Comfort Plus - Compact Toyota Railway Crossover fourth generation, equipped with a 2.0 liter gasoline atmospheric motor, a stepless variator and a plug-in full drive. Average for Rav4 Comfort Plus Comfort. Produced in 2014 in Japan.-Mazda CX-5 II 2.0 AWD AT 2017 Active - a second-generation Mazda compact crossover, equipped with a gasoline atmospheric motor with a SkyActiv technology of 2.0 liters, 6-speed automatic transmission and connected Full-wheel drive. Average for CX-5 Active equipment. Produced in 2017 in Japan and already fully assembled in Vladivostok.

Full size

Mazda CX-5 2017VS Toyota RAV4 2014

Walking on more significant criteria. And so, CX-5 VS RAV4.

DesignCX-5 in my opinion has a more interesting design at least because it is newer than RAV4. In general, CX-5 both inside and outside of the design has been fame. Externally, the car is very beautiful, there is a pair of raisins like grille, optics, interesting body lines / bends. Sitting to the cabin inspires even more, Bravo Mazda, the salon is very pleasant, high-quality materials, magnificent ergonomics. In RAV4, with this problem, it is more chopped, the nuances are not worked out.

Motor RAV4 I liked unpretentiousness. Whatever oil, which gasoline does not flood, the equation will still go, the pair seemed to him that he was just anyway. About CX-5 I cannot say such a thing, see what will show exploitation. But what was not in RAV4, the Duck is the dynamics of overclocking, which, with the same volume and power of the engine in CX-5, an order of magnitude better. And even beyond the lack of a start-stop function (in both cars).

The box of transmission on RAV4 is a bit buzzing. It was not strained after used to and knew that it was he. The automatic transmission on CX-5 is slightly kicking in traffic jams, which is typically for the machine. In general, the work of both aggregates is pleased, although of course the classic machine is valued more.

Connected full Let's drive this item for the future, because Assessing off-road capabilities CX-5 has not been brought. I will only say that the RAV4 test drives are presented as a car with a slightly more developed off-road abilities than CX-5. However, I like it more that in CX-5 there is no button forced blocking the full drive, it is connected by itself if necessary. Like more because in RAV4 because of his unsuccessful ergonomics, press this button on the go at the right moment is a whole story, it is only visible and you must first grop.

Suspendially the unconditional superiority of Mazda. The work of the suspension is simply ideal in comparison with Toyota. Small and medium road irregularities are not felt. Large pits reach very deeply. On the country road, the suspension is also expected to leave - the car goes confidently, without trembling and sembling. In RAV4, each unevenness was transferred to the salon very clearly. This is perhaps most strained in the chase.

Handling CX-5, having a hereditary inclination to more acute control, as it should be Mazda, steals much more interesting. Less rolls, comes in a ratio confident, reacts faster to the rotation of the steering wheel. The steering wheel of the sedanisco is light. The chalk is just enough.

Complete set of cars are approximately equal. Moreover, today with an equal price RAV4 has a pair of options more. In both cars there is everything you need for comfortable operation and some pleasant bonuses, such as navigation, LED Far and Middle Light, various assistants and so on. I also note that in the basic trifles Mazda Dobreye. There are automatic closers for all brakes and their backlight, the backlight of the glove box, the autopy of the doors with a bunch of adjustable locking torque modes, and other pleasant little things, which in Toyota, alas, no.

Noise isolation of this CX-5 out of competition. I propose to get acquainted with the post about noise insulation and everything will become clear. In RAV4 I can say about it forgotten.

Capacked earlier in the comments that the capacity worries many. In general, RAV4 is close to the reference content in its class. A lot of space on both rows of seats, big trunk. CX-5 in numbers is slightly smaller, but in fact the following. Front space for the driver and passenger is enough. After you, behind yourself, I am also quite comfortable. The wife in the back row with the child in the car seat is also shy not feels. The trunk is due to even floor, more competent and ergonomic curtains and the absence of a grid, more spacious and comfortable, although, in numbers is probably less. The same stroller, bags, bags are covered without any problems, which is actually required.

QualityRav4 arranged the quality of the details, but CX-5 in my opinion did more quality car both in general and in the nuances. The quality of the materials is excellent, savings are not read in anything. In the cabin, press and twist the different dac buttons are generally a pleasure that was not in RAV4, from the word at all.

Toyota and Mazdasam Mark Toyota inspired more globality, felt that it was a cargoant. Mazda is certainly not so. There is no low cost, it is simply clear that this company is less. Yes, less, but from this and exclusive. And one more nuance. Toyota, like a large corporation, there is Toyota herself - a popular segment, and Lexus is a premium segment. Mazda has only one brand. As a result, Mazda turns out a little more premium, because There is no possibility to breed models in different segments.

Summing up I will say that possessing RAV4 and there was no thoughts that the car is bad or something particularly failed. Rather, he went on it and did not know the trouble. And would go further a few more years, if not a sad case. Moreover, choosing new car Will blindly went to order a new RAV4, but did not come around for reasons independent of me. And with Mazda, everything turned out. And I am very glad that I have. Mazda qualitatively worked on the new CX-5, the car turned out very worthy! Those who are trying to make a pragmatic choice, do not envy. Of these cars, it is better to choose a heart (or soul), in which car is easier to breathe, chtoli. Both cars are good, without critical shortcomings and outstanding superiorities. I will add only to the fact that you did not regret that I took Mazda. Twice in a row take almost the same car at least boring.

That's all. I understand that absolutely all the nuances for one post do not decompose, so leave comments, we will understand what you are interested in or what you think unfair not marked. All good luck!

www.drive2.ru.

What is better - Toyota RAV 4 or Mazda CX-5

So it came a turn of checking heavyweights, so-called not only because of their own mass, but also due to the dynamic appearance and nature of cars. Crossovers, how to call them for a long time, today two, but what! Combining amazing external data and practicality, these cars test just a dream. And so we were given such an opportunity. We carry out a comparative review of Toyota RAV 4 and Mazda CX-5.

Toyota Rib 4 car

Immediately in battle

The fact that the car, almost any size and class, should look bright, introduced the Mazda manufacturers in the hard concept. It is no secret to control their cars is a pleasure. Although over time, the unshakable philosophy of Mazda changed and revised, its deep essence remained the same.

As for Toyota, the manufacturers of this Japanese concern promised to return to the release of drive models a few years ago. And the most bright is the intention of manufacturers manifested with the release of GT86 - car in style sports coupe. Although experts see a manifestation of a driver's character and in the design of modern Raving. 4. In addition, this car for many years has become something similar to the bestseller, having accumulated a solid luggage of loyalty from buyers.

Toyota Rav 4 As for the convenience of daily operation, just perfect. Harmoniously looks at the body of the body and the strict "face expression" of this crossover is not as emphasizing the convenience as excellent ergonomics and the volume of the trunk.

As for the front panel RAY 4, with a layered structure, it looks much more pleasant to the interior of the monolithic Mazda CX-5. Yes, and all sorts of shelves of secluded type, naughty, and the like stuff in RAV 4 are clearly more.

But, to be honest, to get comfortable in them, you need a lot of time. For example, why do you need to put your phone in the tray under the protrusion of the central console, how do you offer to make manufacturers when it perfectly falls in the cup holder, which is located closer and does not need to reach it every time to get it? In addition, the buttons block itself, including the switching mode to the "Sport", exacerbating the reaction of the machine, is pumped somewhere deep under the central console. Why it is asked, it was, especially if the passenger, who wanted to turn on the heated of the seats, should ask for the driver, as it does not get to the button.

Mazda CX-5

As for the interior of Mazda CX-5, then it is designed for the classical tradition and all the buttons here in sight. Specially provided a large niche, where you can store a thousand little things. It is immediately under the climate control button immediately, and so much free space does not disappear in vain. I also liked that the cup holders are shifted back, and immediately behind the automatic transmission of Mazda, or rather by its selector, the multimedia control unit is located. Everything is comfortable and at hand. Although it is a little complicated to use this multimedia system. A pretty weightwind metal washer is installed on the block, but to be able to use it, you need to remember the location of the buttons. And at first, at all you need to look at the monitor and keys all the time.

As for the instrument panel, it is more successful in Mazda. Pleases a large screen for additional information and three wells made with designer taste. But Toyota Toyota tool 4 looks, to be honest, much worse. But special difficulties with the reading of information, and this, however, and most importantly, does not arise. Only now again, they give archaic in Toyota Raving 4 windows keys that offer automatic control Only the driver. But in Mazda on the contrary - all passengers.

Video Review car Toyota Rav 4:

Seats on Mazda CX-5 is just super. In particular, it concerns the modification of the Supreme car, where the chairs are covered with delicate skin, and the side support rollers are made in sports hard.

Also good and the seats of the top modification of Toyota Rail 4 prestige with roof rails. True, the upholstery of the chairs at Toyota are made much rougher.

On the test we have two cars of these manufacturers with an equal volume of engine 2.2 and with diesel enginesbut power in Mazda CX-5 on 25 hp more. Interesting and the fact that manufacturers of Mazda CX-5 took care to release a modification that would have impressed by those drivers who mutted from unnecessary "bellsopped". Such a modification was the Mazda CX-5 diesel, executed as ACTIVE. There is such a car about 1,405 thousand Russian rubles. Parktronic is not installed here, there is no invincible access and electrical management driver's chair. But everything is upholstered dear and pleasant to the touchcloth.

As for the RAY 4 developers, they thought about picky customers and released a modification called Toyota Rav 4 comfort plus, which is not so electrified. The modification is practically devoid of various auxiliary systems, such as monitoring blind zones, for example.

Whether in unison hearts are fighting

On the video test drive car Mazda CX-5:

Click on the start button and Toyota RAV 4 comes to life. True, in cold weather, on idling The engine ropes, as a tractor, but as heated it becomes much quieter. 150 horses Toyota Railway 4 in the conditions of urban ride, and in the country tracks, it is enough for a comfortable movement from one point to another. It is pleasant to always take overtaking on this machine, since the 6-step automatic transmission works just perfect. In addition, if necessary, it will be possible to use manual mode, and the transmissions can be forcibly switch to the selector. This situation can be relevant in the winter season.

Interestingly, Rav 4 with a popular 2.5 liter gasoline engine there are no stealing petals, and on our model they are available. In addition, it is also noteworthy, on the gasoline version of the RAX 4 nod of the lever in mode S, you can only limit the switching range by setting the upper limit above which the automatic transmission will not rise.

Diesel engine SKYACTIV Mazda CX-5, which is endowed with a reduced degree of compression, as mentioned above, more powerful to Toyotovsky by 25 hp It is immediately felt when cars accelerate. In addition, Mazda CX-5 suspension is tougher than and explained by the thrill when driving. But noise insulation in RAV 4 is performed on the manner higher than that of the Mazda CX-5.

As for turns, there is a pleasure on Mazda CX-5. Rolls are practically not felt, and the steering wheel of Mazda "Short", which in the intellectual plan is made ingenious. But the "lying policemen", found often on the urban streets, Mazda CX-5, to put it mildly, does not digest. These obstacles are desirable to pass carefully, otherwise hard suspension Let me know about yourself, and clearly blows will be felt in the cabin. Yes, and at high speed, noise from rubbing with the road surface of tires, in Mazda CX-5 easily penetrates.

Luggage compartment of car Toyota Rav 4

But in Toyota RAY 4 hide. Maybe this is explained not only to high-quality electrical insulation? After all, the suspension on RAV 4 is made significantly relaxed than that of the Mazda CX-5, although the producers of the current generation were made by the current generation to give a new model more brutality. This car rulits itself quite transparent, not having an obsessive artificial effort in the okolonulous zone.

Transmission and four-wheel drive

The operation of the transmission of Mazda CX-5 also admires. The automatic transmission quickly changes the transfer and the feeling such that the wheels with the engine are connected by rail. Such a feeling, in particular, develops due to the fact that the torque converter in the Mazdovskaya box is blocked in a wider range of revolutions. In addition, the European I-STOP system is installed on Mazda CX-5, which automatically jams the engine in traffic jams. The option allows not only to take care of ecology, but also allows you to significantly save fuel.

But Rav 4 such a useful option does not have.

It is worth noting that both crossovers are equipped with diesel engines with automatically connected full-wheel drive, which does not become such an advantage on off-road. It's just one thing to drive on a rascal suburb of the countryside before my giving or park a snowdrift, and another to show wonders on the off-road, like our Niva (why not?).

The moment when the coupling is triggered by Mazda CX-5 it is difficult to catch a novice that first got behind the wheel of this vehicle It may seem that the drive here is permanent, and not connected.

Rav 4 is not so. The rear axle connects to the case much tangible, and if you wish, you can block the coupling. As for the blocking of interstole differentials, it is simulated in this case by brakes.

Trunk car Mazda CX-5

Automatically turns on all-wheel drive and in sport mode. In this case, up to half of the total number of torque revolutions turns to the rear axle.

Here the luggage compartment at Toyota Railway is arranged in the same way as the interior is difficult and incomprehensible. For example, to place under the floor, the spare wheel, Japanese engineers have thought up with clean Asian meticulousness, to build a real podium, surrounded by such scan that lose anything valuable tune there.

At Mazda CX-5, although the floor and smooth, but doubt causes the loading height, which is too vital.

Judging as a whole, both crossovers are equipped with fame and fully behave on the road. Their price is comparable, and the choice will depend on individual preferences. It can be said that the question of these two crossovers goes into the category of philosophical, where there can be no better and worst option. After all, in fact, accumulate advantages along the distance or show them on the finish the same thing.

Advantages and disadvantages

Let's start with the advantages of Mazda CX-5:

• Mazda is equipped with a rooftop hatch, on some versions;
• installed start-stop system;
• powerful engine;
• good maximum speed;
• relatively low price;
• fresh look at the interior, tailored by classichelas;
• instruments stubborn in sports in wells;
• convenient location of the center console and niche for trifles;
• the absence of any secret zakulkov;

And now about the minuses of Mazda CX-5:

• a complex multimedia control unit, although located conveniently located;
• equipment of parking sensors only expensive versions;
• an unnecessary magnitude of the loading height of the trunk;
• lack of electric drive in the door of the trunk.

Now Toyota Rail 4, in which there are its advantages:

• numerous shelves and niches;
• electrically regulating driver's seat;
• automatic mode of windows, though, only from the driver;
• good separation of the front panel on the conditional horizontal layers;
• laconic instrument shield;
• convenient screen under the speedometer, where you can display a sign of the tracking tracking system;
• comfortable manual transmission regimens with great capabilities;
• equipment of the rear view of almost all versions;
• spacious and convenient rear sofa, divided into sections, which are deflected at different angles;

And there are its minuses:

• incomprehensible podium in the luggage compartment;
• too a large number of niches and scallets, where long and get lost;
• too soft suspension;
• the seat upholstery looks relatively worse.

What to say? In the asset at Toyota Rav 4 - experience, reliability and impressive sales circulation, which affects the reference in its class. But is it the only true way to achieve heights? Doubtful if you look at the Mazda CX-5, which is so to speak, clearly shows that the technological breakthrough is not inferior to any evolution.

Some word, resume This: if you need a frisky and dynamic car, then Mazda CX-5 is more suitable, and if you need more comfort, please contact Toyota Rail 4.

rating-Avto.ru.

Toyota RAV 4 and Mazda CX5 - Comparative Analysis

Comparison of auto Rav4 and Mazda CX 5 - one of the favorite fun car enthusiasts recent years. Both cars are typical "Japanese", both - reference crossovers, both have similar characteristics and even appearance. All this creates a rich soil for disputes. We will try to make clarity. So, Mazda CX 5 or Toyota Rav 4 - what car is better?

Toyota RAV 4.

If you have to compare Toyota RAV 4 VS Mazdacx5, then it is better to start from Toyota as a more traditional participant in our car market. The first generation of Toyota RAV 4 was positioned as a car for young people. That is why the framework of the crossover scheme was taken.

The car, as comfortable as possible in the city, rapid on the highway, on which, however, at any time you can smend "to hell on the horns" - it is this approach that the philosophy of the youth car from Toyota is most closely reflected.

And although the representative of the first generation of the family came up from the factory conveyor in the distant 1994, the car retained and developed the overall concept, leaving the disadvantages of children's diseases in the past.

Engine and chassis

We will agree immediately - we will discuss only the options for the configuration, officially supplied to the territory of Russia. In the Russian Federation, the Toyota Railway crossover comes with two versions of the engine, characterized by its volume: 2 and 2.5 liters, with a capacity of 140 and 180 horse power respectively.

Important! In both cases, the engine gasoline. Toyota Rav4 in a diesel version in Russia, unfortunately, is officially not covered.

The car has a permanent four-wheel drive, which is reflected in the name (RecreationActiveVehicle4 - a digit means four drive wheels). Speaking of Toyota Rav4, it is impossible not to note the possibility of blocking the electronic power selection coupling on the rear axle, which almost turns the crossover into an honest SUV. Almost - not counting enough modest (according to the standards of SUVs) of the engine.

Exterior

Although the appearance of the car was conceived by designers as a youth, to the first generation RAV 4 at the beginning, the definition was firmly "stuck". And it is not surprising: on the background of the grutal jeeps characteristic of the era of the 90s, the elegant "PARQUITING" looked, at best, like the younger sister of the diesel offeper off-road.

Working on the Rav4 2017, the developers decided to radically change the situation - and, I must say, it was possible. In many ways, the spirit of time contributed to the Spirit of Time-april all-wheel drive giants, which occupied one and a half parking spaces, if they did not go to the past, they certainly stopped dominated in the city landscape. It is superfiling to fluctuate the prices of fuel or an increase in the consciousness of drivers who began to think more about the world and surrounding people - the topic of a separate discussion. But the fact remains a fact - crossovers ceased to be "undercurrents" among giants.

Plus, the designers themselves tried: more outstanding the bumper Rav4 recent generations resembles a powerful chin of a Hollywood superhero. Recessed headlights began to look more aggressive. Even too, according to some. In general, redesign in order to attract the male audience can be considered a successful, as evidenced by the dynamics of sales.

Interior

The interior of Toyota Railway - demonstrates the continuation of the ideas of the exterior: an angular front panel by all its appearance demonstrates similarity with the landers of the 90s, which were probably once the limit of the current owners of crossovers.

Designers of the interior decoration probably guided by the principle of "big boys - more toys", the abundance of the management bodies of various systems, all sorts of "twist", "switches" and "prescription" is emphasized in every possible way and is emphasized. The driver's "interface" of the car loudly and confidently declares that the place of a woman in this salon is right sitting (in the European left-handed salon, of course).

The Toyota designers clearly took care of the wheel of Raving themselves felt comfortably even the driver is quite large. About the orientation to a more mature audience says the old-fashioned design of the devices. The main message - Toyota grows and develops with its owner. The young and promising driver Rav4 1994 became the wealthy and respectable owner of the fourth generation.

Reference! Basic equipment Toyotarav 4 2016 will cost the buyer from Russia at 1,459,000 rubles.

Mazdacx5

And what can oppose the closest competitor?

Mazda CX-5 went to the series in 2011, one and a half decades later a competitor from Toyota. The car has already been developed, taking into account the experience of crossover crossovers, which made it possible to bypass many "rakes", which predecessors managed to come.

Thus, designers managed to reduce the mass of the main nodes and units without loss of functionality. The fact that the car was clearly succeeded, it also says that Mazda CX-5 two times in a row became a car in Japan - in 2012 and 2013.

Engine and chassis

Toyotarav4 and Mazda CX5 have the same volumes of gasoline engines - 2 and 2.5 liters, but Mazda CX-5 is presented on russian market and2,2-liter diesel. Diesel power - 175 horsepower.

Scheme chassis - permanent four-wheel drive. Drivers reviews excellent operation of the hydrotransformer, which allows you to use the "automatic" even on off-road.

The European version of the Mazda CX-5 (namely it comes to Russia) is equipped with a rather controversial system I-STOP - "Intelligent Stop", which automatically turns off the engine with a long stop of the car, for example, in traffic jam, on the traffic light, railway crossing.

It is interesting! It is curious that on Mazda CX-5 cars sold in Japan, I-STOP systems are not. What conclusions from this follow - the question is open.

Ai-stop allows to reduce noise and emissions into the atmosphere, the engine resource is noticeably spent, which is not justified by a spear savings of fuel. Many include the I-Stop system to the unique minuses of Mazda, although there is no good reason for that - the ah-stop can always be disabled.

Exterior

When looking at the Silhouette of the CX-5 Mazda, it is impossible not to note the rapidness of the car, emphasized by numerous intensities. It seems that the shape of the body was given not designers and designers, but the opposite air itself "licked" the streamlined profile of the liquid metal.

But in total there is a reverse side: thanks to the rapid forms, the crossover from Mazda seems relatively more compact and low, which may not like convinced "jeepodam" for which the car is an indicator of status and significance.

Interior

The first word that comes to mind when looking at the interior of the Mazda CX-5 2016 is laconic. It seems that control bodies on the driver's panel are minimized. However, with a more detailed study, it becomes clear - the control functionality did not suffer in any way, just designers did not find it necessary to set it at the bottom.

The multimedia screen is recessed in the panel, which, firstly, it reflects the style that designers chose, secondly, protects well from solar glare and reflections of other people's headlights.

In general, the interior of the Mazda CX5 2017 is more "modern", futuristic, but is respectable than reminiscent of the recognized style icon in Auto - BMW.

Reference! Russian, who decided to become the owner of the official Mazda CX-5 will have to fork at least 1,349,000 rubles. If you choose at the price, Mazda is your option.

The results of the comparison of cars in dimensions are presented below:

Toyota RAV4 or Mazdacx 5 - What is better? Give an unequivocal answer to this question is difficult.

Mazdacx 5 and Toyota RAV4-typical representatives of the modern class of crossovers. If you basically share the philosophy of the car for all occasions, then in any model you will find pluses and cons. Well, the final choice remains yours!

Four Japanese crossover

Be fighting for our hearts.

In Russia like this.

To Moscow Honda CR-V The fifth generation came in winter, and we even managed to bring acquaintance with her (SM, No. 1, 3, 2017) while it was certified. And when the case was introduced to take a commodity CR-V, arrived. It is noteworthy that both models at first will be offered with flagship motors of 2.5 and 2.4 liters, respectively. Sin does not push them in full-time confrontation! Partners in the test performed Mitsubishi Outlander. 2.4 and Toyota RAV4 2.5, occupying not recent places in the D-crossovers segment.

His alien

Ornate equipped outlander!

Sorry loud cry this

Disappears in the abyss.

Before the departure passed the results of our group tests with the participation of the outlander and found that he turned out to be in the way. Only once, immediately after the debut, was located in the middle of the score table. But "Stranger" (so translates his name) for us not someone else - it is released in Kaluga.

It cannot be said that the Japanese waved at Outlander hand. On the contrary, it is upgraded by almost every year, for which the honor of them and praise. In the fight against overheating, the radiator of the variator was installed (and why was it removed?), Then the appearance was updated, then introduced an improved all-wheel drive transmission for versions with the V6 motor. And this year it came out with LED fighters, circular survey cameras, blind zone control systems and interference detection when driving reverse and with the new Mitsubishi Connect multimediasystem. All this is good, we appreciated, the benefit of the test Outlander - just in the flagship execution.

The miracle did not happen. Outlander on the background of competitors - like Achilles, which can not catch up with a turtle: those all the time turn out to step ahead. So now, despite the next update, an old-fashioned taste is clearly felt inside the "out". Gloomy black finish, simple eco-eklood, simple seats with kuts range adjustments. The new multimediasystem liked the logical interface and quick responses, but surprised by the lack of navigator. Informant GPS coordinates - weak consolation. The ears of the variator petals completely overlap the pictograms on the steering wheel switches, and the transmission selector is located too low. And decisively has nowhere to attach a smartphone. For a car for 2 109 990 rubles a lot of flaws.

Partly Outlander rehabilitated on the go. In the city, he bribes a good visibility and a coherent duet of a 167-strong engine and variator. But it was worth going to the track, as Idyll died, like the contents of the bottle of Sake in the Japanese restaurant. The motor is superiorly preserved with active acceleration, and road noise is too many. The shaking suspension is forced to drop a move even in front of the humble lips. It gets irregularity with a bigger caliber - will follow a painful blow, which is spoiled not only the seat, but also the steering wheel. Competitors do not allow themselves to be.

Even on a flat, like glass, the Mitsubishi road does not give pleasure: an inadvertent effort on the steering wheel, pronounced insufficient turning and non-pronounced brakes, grabbing at the very end of the working stroke of the pedal. And with a sharp slowdown, Outlander slightly elozit along the trajectory and disgusts tires - from the cars with the ABS I have not heard such a long time. This is clearly not the hero of my novel.

But hope will be worse on off-road talents. And on this field, the "alien" spoke not bad. You can block a multi-disc clutch in the rear wheel drive (this allows Toyota RAV4). The main thing is to disable ESP so that the motor does not squeeze.

In the mud baths "Out" feels confident. Nakhpistyshitsky dying forward, spreading the wheels of the splashing soil. And everything would be fine, but the oak pendant on Buaeraka shares the soul. And ten minutes did not pass, as I wanted to stop and translate the Spirit.

Hard suspension and noisy power unit are not covered with no restinglings. To perform on an equal footing with more modern "Japanese", outlander is necessary to change generations.

Unrefined

Bestseller market

We criticize.

That also happens.

Looking into the sales statistics of 2016, I sused: RAV4 became the most popular Toyota in Russia! Implemented 30,603 cars - the seventh place in the "Absolute" of the Russian model standby. The lag of competitors - the crossovers of the D-segment - impressive. So, the second place, Nissan X-Trail found only 17,886 buyers. With all the time in our last tests, RAV4 did not notice convincing performances. Maybe now, after, will it reveal in all its glory?

I dive into the salon in the secret hope to see a new multimediaxy system with Yandex. Navigator, but this option is only for Exclusive execution. And in our car - the usual navigator with outdated graphics, as if the last ten years IT-industry traveled in place. Salon RAV4 leaves a mixed feeling. Circular review cameras, automatic braking system Before an obstacle, a platform with induction charging of smartphones is cool. But how to destroy the spirit of the cassens?

"Kizzy" plastic and a primitive lever control of cruise control, "recently" to the steering wheel, peel sadness. Surprise causes not only a handbrake handle (competitors - key), but also its plastic finish. And this in the car for 2 134,000 rubles?!

But the visibility is beautiful, as well as the convenience of landing. The ergonomics of the first order of questions does not cause: the main controls are located as it should and where necessary. But the secondary button-swoker buttons are crushed as it fell and without any, at least understandable to us, logic. Well, why the steering heating button is up to the clutch lock button, and the seats heating keys are next to the control of the variator modes? But in the cabin there are plugs - so what prevented everything to compose in human?

On the go "Rafik" is good. It is accepted for 9.4 seconds to a hundred: just slower Mazda and for a whole second faster than Honda and Mitsubishi. Excellent addition to the cheerboat - 6-speed automatic, which is always accurate and timely adjusts the necessary transfer. Sorry Toyota - in pleasure! Yes, and the handling is quite gambling. If, of course, forgive mediocre feedback on the steering wheel.

During the last update, RAV4 got softer springs and recalibrated shock absorbers, which, maybe increased the smoothness of the stroke, but quite a little. Shone, crossing, painful blows - all of these Toyota flows with enthusiasm worthy of better use. Especially gets rear passengers. The head restraints of the second row tremble so that it is impossible to catch them in focus! And yet there is no discomfort of the outlander. First, the steering wheel does not break out of the hands. Secondly, shaking manifests itself at higher speeds than in Mitsubishi.

For off-road, our RAV4 is firmly suitable, and there are several reasons. Home -165 mm road Suit. Not seriously! Mondering for this, I drove very carefully from the asphalt. It seems and the coupling has previously blocked, but still prominently in the risky field. Rotating wheels instantly cautate ESP.

So, and "Where is he a button?" Disable "Antibux" managed, just to look into the manual. No wonder I scolded a chaotic placement of the buttons: the ESP OFF key - at the top of the center console, near the indicators of the unused belts. The lamp in the style of "Rafik is not guilty" in this case does not work. Still as guilty! As it turned out, the sense of this function is not enough, since the electronics gives it to be stopped only with rectilinear movement. It turns out the steering wheel and open the throttle, as ESP defines the start of the drift and cuts off the craving.

In general, despite numerous advantages, RAV4 looks eclectic. A couple of years ago, in comparison with the competitors, he methyl to the leaders, and now moved to the category of middle peasants. But buyers this fact seems to be confused. They choose RAV4 for the legendary Toyotovskiy reliability and high residual value. And this is the trumps from the discharge not fighting. And - the best proof of that.

Achelerat.

Spacious comfort

Delight cause.

But not the price.

However, the obstacle in the struggle for wallets of buyers will not be a modest CR-V patency, but a high price. The test machine with a similar level of equipment is more than 150 thousand more than top versions of competitors.

Strong five

A number of wishes

Established the Japanese.

It became more comfortable.

Mazda CX-5 belongs to an informal achievement: she won in all of our group tests in which she took part. Therefore, we considered a new generation machine with special addiction, the benefit of considering such beauty is nice.

The appearance is absolutely recognizable. Opports, dimensions - everything is like the predecessor. But the refinement appeared in the details. The radiator grille, instead of banal planks, is decorated with small turbines, attract attention and fog in size with a five-core coin.

Salon is a good step towards the premium. Against the background of Japanese classmates - that a boutique hotel against typical "three stars". Everywhere good soft plastic; The glove box and boxing in the armrest are covered with a soft cloth, the audio system with BOSE acoustics gives crystal clear sound. Level!

Buttons, keys and levers? According to Fidbeck and tactile sensations, it is almost BMW or AUDI. Especially liked the controlling the microclimate and the information and entertainment system of the washer with a notch. The multimedia interface is perhaps the best among yourself: everything is extremely clear and understandable. It is a pity, the screen is small at the current times (you have to look at the navigation map), and also infuriates too long - five seconds - downloading a list of radio stations.

CX-5 seriously advanced by part of electronics. The projection of the devices on the windshield appeared (the quality and informativeness of the picture is no worse than in the above-mentioned BMW and AUDI), the function of monitoring the blind zones and even the deduction system in the movement band, which none of today's opponents offers. What Mazda could not replay them, so it is the seats: they are the most ordinary.

At idle turns, the motor is absolutely not heard, and he is silent on the go. But pulls aki beast! The slightest pulse accelerator, and the car ripped forward. And it does not matter, at what mark at that moment the arrow of the speedometer is "20" or "120". Umnichka automatically understands everything from half daughter. When it is necessary, there are three programs at once, when not - it keeps small speed and saves fuel.

The main revelation is the striking smoothness of the course than anything could not boast. On the broken asphalt CX-5 rolls like a velvet track - in this class, such a serenity I have not yet been met. The suspension with ease swallows various-caliber pits that make themselves known except with microtasters on the steering wheel.

At the same time, engineers managed to maintain light, air handling. How at ease of Mazda is screwed into diverse turns, how hard it holds for the trajectory, how sharp and withdrawing her steering wheel! Great chassis! Such love and ease of being in this segment can demonstrate except Volkswagen Tiguan.. Which, by the way, in a rich configuration and with comparable power, the engine will be more expensive on half a million.

The brakes had to be escaped. In the efficiency of deceleration of CX-5, it is not inferior to competitors, but the drive informativeness is so-so. Mechanisms did not come true? So after all, the CR-V went to Novekhonk, however, there is a mutual understanding with the left pedal at once.

Outside the asphalt Mazda did not save. Special off-road modes are not provided, it is impossible to block the coupling, but CX-5 rushing on dirt with the imperturbability of the present SUV. there is weighing advantages And before "automatic" RAV4: clearance of 200 mm and a practically smooth bottom.

Yuri Timkin: "Mazda CX-5 fascinated the balance of outrequisite control and high driving comfort. This is one of the best crossovers in the segment. And among Japanese - the best. "

Even before counting the points it was obvious that the victory for Mazda. Honda perfectly performed: she showed himself better on off-road, could well be divided from CX-5 first place.

RAV4 and especially Outlander no longer impress the strong players. And this "point" problem is not solved - only change of generations. The benefit of "shifts" on the approach. But the Mazda hurt such that until nothing threatens her.

Youth ignites

Beauty burst.

Do not resist them.

Toyota Rav4 and Mazda CX-5 have long been not new to the Russian market and managed to conquer the sympathies of many of their customers. Both cars are interesting in their own way, everyone has its own ideology and price policy. We bring to your attention a comparison of these two compact crossovers from the point of view of strict digits and user reviews.

In view of the fact that automatic gearboxes are increasingly conquering the market, we will take the cheapest versions of Japanese crossovers with automatic transmission. So today we compare Mazda CX-5 2.0 (150 hp) and 2.0 CVT (145 hp). Moreover, Toyota in this configuration costs its competitor for 122 thousand rubles.

Overall comparison. Slightly more Toyota RAV4: It is longer than 15 mm (4570 mm) and wider by 5 mm (1845 mm), but the wheelbase looks in the winning Mazda CX-5 by as much as 40 mm, and the clearance of CX-5 is higher (215 mm versus 197 mm). It is noteworthy that RAV4 is heavier at 157 kg and has a greater volume of gas tank (60 liters).

Technical comparison. The volume of engines in Toyota RAV4 and Mazda CX-5 are the same, but the first slightly more power (150 hp against 145 hp). Plus, the torque at RAV4 is significantly lower: 187 nm against 210 nm, which means that the speed of the crossover from Mazda will be quicked faster. What is there with overclocking to "hundreds"?

• Mazda CX-5 - 8.9 seconds.
• Toyota RAV4 - 11.1 sec.

Competitors and transmissions are distinguished: CX-5 is used a 6-speed automatic machine, and RAV4 has a stepless variator. What is preferable for you, of course, not to solve us, however, in terms of maintainability, it is definitely a classic automatic transmission.

Comparison of complete sets. It makes sense to talk about the same options, so we will compare we differ. So, Mazda CX-5 has an ESP, start-stop system, tire pressure sensor and start the engine from the buttons, as well as the headlight washer, the central armrest and the third rear head restraint. And the Toyota RAV4 has in the Bluetooth multimedia system, a multifunctional steering wheel, fog lights, Electrical heating area of \u200b\u200bthe wipers of the janitor, a helping system at the start of the mountain and airbag to protect the drivers' knees. Recall that Mazda CX-5 costs 1,284,000 rubles, and Toyota RAV4 - 1,406,000 rubles.

Only thorough comparison helps to determine what is better in fact. This rule There are also for cars, so today we will try to compare Rav 4 and Mazda Cx 5. Comparison of these two Japanese crossovers is due to the fact that they are about one price category, and in other of their characteristics they are quite comparable, so it will be interesting to find out Which of these cars is still more reliable and in what criteria.

Toyota car concern implements only two engines on the Russian market. The first 2-liter gasoline engine includes 146 horsepower, and the second engine is slightly bulky - 2.5 liters at 180 hp. Diesel units Inaccessible in Russia, which will not say about Mazda, who presented in our market a wider category of possible options.

The Russian market presents the following engines from Mazda:

• Two-liter gasoline.
• 2.5 liter petrol.
• 2.2 liter diesel engine, possessing 175 hp

If compared in this component, Mazda wins a confident victory, because in addition to the broader line of the presented aggregates, the gasoline engines of this brand are also more powerful, in comparison with the engines from Toyota.

However, if you inspect technical equipment, Toyota turns out to be more preferable. Toyota RAV 4 has xenon optics in its configuration, as well as cars are equipped with an electronic clutch blocking function. This circumstance allows you to transfer torque on the rear axle of the car.

Exterior of cars

The exterior of the car RAY 4 was perceived by many with a considerable share of skepticism, because the body, and the other elements of the appearance of the car, obviously lacked some brutality. Now this problem is practically solved, because the designers added more stringent forms in 2016, which noticeably attracted the interest of the male half of buyers. But the efforts of developers cause many disputes, because the front part of the crossover turned out to be unnaturally elongated, which affected the appearance of the headlights - they became strong enough.

As for the CX-5, its appearance is much more aggressive, which will certainly enjoy fans of sports cars and "Drive". However, an improved exterior played a screw joke with a car - externally, it seems slightly smaller and lower, if compared with Toyota. Yes, and the reliability of the body at Toyota is higher.

If we talk generally, Mazda looks more colorfully and modern, so it is more common that young people who value the appearance of the car almost above all are chosen. Toyota RAV 4 also looks worthy, but in the exterior, there is some conservatism in the exterior, so it is believed that this machine is intended for business people and middle-aged people. Although all these categories are very subjective to speak with 100% confidence.

Interior of cars

Choosing what is more reliable and better - CX 5 or RAY 4, it is very important to pay attention to the interior of these cars. There is a lot of interesting things here, because the salons of these Japanese crossovers are absolutely not similar to each other. Mazda salon is somewhat minimalistically, without any excesses. There is a standard set of functions and buttons that are in full driver availability.

Under the climate control button is a fairly spacious niche, where you can store various small things. Behind the selector automatic box The gear is the control of the multimedia system. In short, everything is located here so that the driver can freely reach the main control systems without applying special efforts.

The front panel looks more harmonious at Toyota. In addition, Rav 4 in the cabin is a variety of different shelves, where you can store your personal belongings, etc. However, it seems that the developers have moved a bit with such a functionality, because it takes a certain time to figure them out. Also calls questions the functionality of the cabin. Seat heating button is available only to the driver, i.e. The passenger must ask the driver so that it turns on this function, because he himself is elementary not reaching it. Yes, and other buttons are under the central console, which markedly complicates access to them.

In addition to conservatism and archaic in the exterior of Rabbi 4, it is also visible in some elements of its cabin. In particular, we are talking about the keys of the windows, which are again available only by the driver, and not passengers. Mazda has such problems.

Comparison of the salon would like to continue with the description of the car's chairs. In principle, both seats crossovers are made very high quality, but here again a small advantage in Mazda. Purely on the tactile sensations of their chair are a little softer, while the upholstery looks quite rough.

On the other hand, Toyota wins on the comfort of stay in the cabin. Due to the fact that its side doors are more, the space between the rear and front seats is also more, so passengers are more comfortable behind.

Test Drive Crossovers

The picture would be incomplete if we were not trying to compare these cars directly in the case, i.e. We need a test drive. Toyota responds quickly enough to the start button, but if this happens in the winter season, he is roaring his engine quite loudly. But as it heated, this problem disappears, so it will not be too picky to this fact. The 150 horsepower of the engine is enough for normal ride in the city, as well as on country roads.

Dough video, from infocar

I would especially like to note that overtaking cars on Toyota is simply perfect. This is explained stable work 6-speed automatic transmission. Diesel engine Mazda is a bit more powerful than Toyota's engine, but on the road this difference is quite noticeable. The CX-5 suspension is also tougher, which affects driving, making it more aggressive. It should be noted that gasoline consumption does not increase from this, remaining within reasonable limits. With all these advantages it is worth noting that the Mazda has no worse insulation, so Toyota wins Toyota in this regard.

The stiffness of the Mazda suspension, unlike Toyota, manifests itself during the passage of lying police officers, so it is necessary to take place extremely gently this maneuver. Otherwise, all passengers clearly feel a blow to contact. Often this leads to problems with the suspension, so the repair of this node is quite common in this car.

Specifications

Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 or Toyota Rail 4, it is necessary to pay attention to specifications crossovers. First consider the Mazda data:

• Manufacturer - Japan.
• Body type - wagon.
• Number of doors - 5.
• Move volume - 2191 cubic centimeters.
• Power Indicator - 175 hp
• Torque - 420 nm.
• Acceleration up to 100 km per hour - 9.4 s.
• Type of gearbox - 6 automatic transmission.
• Fuel consumption - 7 liters per 100 km.
• Dimensions (DXSHX) - 455.5 cm / 184 cm / 167 cm.
• Mass - 1629 kg.
• Clearance - 215 mm.
• Tank volume with flammable - 58 liters.
• The volume of the trunk is 403 liters.
• The average cost is 1.366 million rubles.

Consider similar characteristics in RAV 4:

• Manufacturer - Japan.
• Body type - wagon.
• Number of doors - 5.
• The volume of the engine is 2231 cubic centimeters.
• Power Indicator - 150 hp
• Torque - 340 nm.
• Clearance - 197 mm.
• Acceleration up to 100 km per hour - 10 s.
• Type of gearbox - 6 automatic transmission.
• Fuel consumption - 6.5 liters per 100 km.
• Dimensions (DXSHX) - 457 cm / 184.5 cm / 167 cm.
• Mass - 1715 kg.
• The volume of the tank with flammable is 60 liters.
• The volume of the trunk is 577 liters.
• The average cost is 1.4 million rubles.

Based on the above data, we can say that technical Side These cars are largely similar to small differences.

Pros and cons of cars

Based on the information received during tests, some resume can be made. Let's start with the description of the benefits of Mazda CX-5:

• In the configuration there is a start-stop system.
• There is a hatch on the roof.
• Nice good engine power.
• The maximum speed is quite decent for this class of cars.
• The price of Mazda is lower than on Toyota.
• Despite the classic style of the cabin, some of its elements look quite original.
• Convenient location of the dashboard and buttons.

But there are also cons, about which it is also worth mentioning:

• Sophisticated multimedia system management system.
• Parktronic is present only in elite versions.
• There is no electric drive at the door of the trunk.

Here are the main advantages of Toyota RAV 4:

• The presence in the salon of a large number of different shelves.
• The driver's seat is adjustable using an electrical system.
• The dashboard is quite concise.
• The presence of a rear view camera.
• Comfortable places from the back for passengers.

There are also its drawbacks:

• It is not clear why the podium is in the trunk.
• The suspension is not sufficient.
• Seats look not so high quality as Mazda.