What is better than Rio or Octavia. Newee - is it better? Kia Rio against Skoda Rapid. Rapid, and whether he is worth his money

Last year skoda owners Rapid has become a little less than 30,000 people. Is Czech Liftback our compatriots simply underestimated? After all, for 1,000,000 strengthened Russian rubles you can buy real European quality on wheels, and even with excellent handling.

Perhaps, Korean auto industry has already been shared? found answers to all these questions during comparative Test Drive.

EXTERIOR

The new "Rio", which commemorated does not copy anyone from the senior fellow. Tigrin squeezed, of course, it is not deprived, but this beast is smiling in a distinctive modest. Approximately how it makes a former designer Volkswagen Peter Schreyer from joy associated with going to work in Kia.

A taxi drivers who dream of buying the first foreign car in leasing are much more superior. And what is from the LED sections in optics, and behind the BMW connected by a single line, not only the mood rises, but also something else. Plus stylish design wheel disks And Toning rear glasses - not a car, but a dream! Although very ordinary.

After updating Rapid, it became brighter, aggressively and evil - contrast edging of the side mirrors, stylish lining and inserts definitely give the car with sportiness notes. Yes, what is there: in versions of monte Carlo with her fashionable moldings, spoiler and lip car attracts views even those who have given a loan for the previous one.

Against the background of Skoda, the Korean sedan looks pretty boring, but without complaints about the inconsistency - sports and keenness in Rapid is no more than beauty from a girl without makeup.

Ergonomics Salon

Koreans clearly borrow the right ideas from representatives of German autoinadundry, and they make it extremely gently. No "copy-paste" in will not see - everything is decorated under your own sauce, and the level of ergonomics is as high as Mount Ararat.

True, to the height of Elbrus, she does not even reach her - the chairs lack the lumbar backpage and the profile for the comfortable position of the shoulders. Yes, and the steering wheel is so slippery, as if it was smeared with oil, which is used in their plots the heroine of films for adults. But here it will be no less hot than from viewing these most films - it is heated in Rio all and all, including the rear seats and windshield.

Skoda has warm options lose their absence to warm up steering wheel. But the chairs in are integrated so clearly that the sedokas in them do not get tired at all, even if you have to go from Russia to the Czech Republic.

The layout of the interior is thought out to the smallest detail - let the "Volkswagen" patterns still seek boredom, but it does not complain about ergonomics. Perhaps only the instrument shield is perceived in Rio less freight, and otherwise shine.

As for the inner space, the rear row passengers in Skoda will be much more convenient - the seeds of the gallery in Kia will have to be sighted. But the ceiling in the Korean sedan presses the head of the sofa inhabitants is not as critical as the roof of the Czech elefbeck. But luggage compartment Rapid has an explicit advantage - not only in volume (530 l versus 480 l), but also on the convenience of layout.

Riding habits

If the appearance and features of the inner decoration of each of these machines can be used, well, or to continue to infinity to argue about their pluses and minuses, then in terms of challenges Priorities are set pretty quickly.

In the Disciplines "Handle" and "Behavior on the Road", Skoda Rapid is recognized as an impeccable leader. The Czech steering wheel is accurate as the Swiss clock, and the chassis settings allow you to screw in turns with horses and minimal rolls. But blows from the remnants of our roads the car quit hard, although neatly.

In this regard, more comfortable - the suspension gently and smoothly smoothes irregularities, commonly found in Russian directions. True, loves the "Korean" to the roll, and its "Baranka" is lightness.

But he does not take a pause to the sparkle with a sharp start from the place, as the Czech Liftback is required - the sedan is accelerated smoothly and without jerks, and immediately after clicking on the right pedal. Nevertheless, the traditional six-speed hydromechanical "automatic" is the best alternative to the nervous robotic "seventure". Yes, and - judging by the experience of the owners - more reliable.

However, in the sports mode, Rapid responds to the requests of the pilot of lightningry - 125 turbated stallions are able to satisfy. By the time of overclocking until hundreds, he overtakes Rio with an atmospheric about 123 "Skakunas" for two more than a second.

In the winners of Skoda and fuel consumption - in a mixed cycle, Liftback swallows about nine liters, and its opponent is almost 11 liters. The fact that in the TTH of both machines there are completely different numbers: 5.5 liters against 7.1 liters. But the brakes at the Korean sedan work more gently, rather than sharp "Rapid" mechanisms. But noise insulation from the "state employee" from the Czech Republic is clearly more efficient.

Between fans of European and Asian cars, no longer one year is a serious struggle. Both alone and others insist on their right. Today, we compare Kia Rio and Skoda Octavia, and, thereby allowing part of the controversial issues, and also determine what is better.

When Octavia debuted in 1996, he practically did not have serious competitors. Therefore, the first few years the car used just that crazy demand, and the company had to expand production processes (Skoda plants appeared in Ukraine and Russia). Closer to the 2000th, sales level declined, so the developers decided to revive a little market, and held a restyling model.

In 2004, a presentation of Octavia 2 took place, on the basis of which, several years later, was created off-road version Models - Octavia Skout. In 2012, an octavia of the third generation was presented, which was based on a fashionable MQB platform. Interestingly, the model is also produced in the domestic branch, which is located in Nizhny Novgorod.

In 2000, after a long cloud, Kia decided to release a small class car - Rio. The novelty immediately won the love of the public with a wide range of bodies and a relatively low price. In 2005, took place the long-awaited premiere Rio 2. German specialists were engaged in the design of the novelty, so European features appeared in the appearance of the model.

Since 2010, Rio is produced at the Kaliningrad "Avtotor". In the spring of 2011, at the Motor Show in Geneva, Rio of Third Generation debuted. Soon the production of cars at the factory in St. Petersburg started.

Despite the fact that Octavia older than his opponent, award in this opposition.

Appearance

Due to the fact that cars are located in one "weight category" of their body are made according to very similar technologies, in the appearance of models you can find a lot in common.

Even, despite the fact that Czech designers made a bet on a solid and representative exterior, and Koreans are on sophistication and presentability, there is a relationship between some elements.

For example, this is a similar layout of the dashboard and headband headlights, although the latter differ significantly in magnitude.

Side also surprising resemblance. This can also be said about the feed of cars.

But, whatever it was, purely visually, the Rio looks more pretty.

Salon

Skoda Octavia or Kia Rio., Who has the best interior? When you first familiarize yourself with the decoration of both models, you can make the final verdict. Even Octavia Salon, who definitely does not claim the role of advanced in the classroom, looks like a real rich, compared with the Nishchen design of Rio. Take even dashboard. Oktavia, this is a fairly stylish and multifunctional element, and Rio is a simple set of buttons and a small display.

Also, the salon Octavia was decorated with better materials. And at the expense of the capacity of the case is better at the Czech car.

Therefore, we will not invent anything, and will prevent the victory in this point who really deserved it, and this is Skoda Octavia.

Specifications

In 2017, updated versions of models, "Stuffing" we compare. By the way, for greater emphasis, we will discuss cars with petrol engines at 1.6 l. Immediately it is worth noting that Rio is not very demanding of fuel, and it can be filled with even the 92nd. But Octavia can work normally only on the 95th gasoline.

It is very surprising that at least the motors of both cars have the same amount produced by them different power. For example, Octavia can issue 110 horse power, while Rio is 123. This could be explained by the presence of a supercharger from Korean, but it is absent. It is logical to assume that the dynamics of Rio Pugchart. So, the time of acceleration from zero to hundreds of Korean is 10.3 s, and this is 1.7 with faster than the similar indicator of Visavi. Rio is slightly less economical - 6.6 liters in a mixed cycle, against 6.3 liters of Oktavia.

Both Oktavia and Rio, the front-wheel drive trolley. As for the transmission, then the "Cell" is 6-steps "Avtomat" and 5 "mechanics", at Korean 6-speed "automatic" and "mechanics".

In terms of dimensions, everything is not so simple. On the one hand, Oktavia is longer than Rio by 293 mm and above 6 mm. The size of the wheelbase is also more from the Czech car - 2686 against 2570 mm. But the clearance, by as much as 4 mm above the Korean model.

Price

As mentioned above, Kia has always been famous for its loyal price PolicyTherefore, the relatively low cost of the Rio 2017 model - 560,000 rubles was not surprising for anyone. At the same time, it is necessary to post about 950,000 rubles, although it should not hit the pocket.

In the section Choosing a car, a motorcycle to the question of what better kia Rio or Skoda Octavia 2013 release? What is better than Kia Rio or Skoda Octavia 2013 release? The author Marseille Shhaykhmetov given by the author of the best answer is of course the Skoda will be better and more likely, but also more expensive, but the cheapest is better not to take. I have Rio. The car is not bad, I roll the second year and everything is ok, good luck in the choice.

Skoda she class above

Skoda is in principle Volkswagen.

Europeans are better than Korean.

Plyalya compared Kuita with chinese engine and German

Still octavia. BUT. At one time she came forward, overtaking golf, for which she was torn off by the Germans. Engines are becoming inconvenient, pursuit of high impact from a small volume (downsaysing), there are never once, die sharply and very often. Koreans are very tightened, look worthy, and if not enough for Oktavia, Rio is very good. In general, I am fully sure that the Koreans will push the Germans in reliability, quality and even more so in terms of production in the nearest five-year plan.

Octavia. She and the first was very good, and the new is even more practical.

Skoda Lchha! W. kia Engine It is produced in China and already assembled with the box comes in Korea for the assembly of Kia! Therefore, the quality is not very)

Look interesting video According to this topic

As the comrade of cucumbers from the "carnival night" said, "the work was done huge, I am satisfied with the team, but further, comrades, so it will not go." After all, with the change of generation sale of Solaris collapsed on a quarter! He was an absolute leader - and rolled to the fourth place. As we assumed in (SE, № 5, 2017), the Rio of the last generation immediately picked up the fallen banner: he increased sales by 17% and went to the leaders. He is cheaper, here are the people and reached out.

And what's new Rio? Grounding and rose. We took version 1.6 with a machine gun and maximized Premium - Such Rio is offered for 989,900 rubles. Similarly, equipped with Solaris is even more expensive: 1,035,900 rubles. But invited to the test updated Rapid. 1.4 DSG in the maximum style of Style easily took this bar: for the machine with a mass of options like bixenon headlamps should be given 1 144 100 rubles. Three years ago for such money, it was possible to take a good equipped octavia ...

Classic and Rock and Roll

All three cars represent a massive budget segment, however, it did not affect the chassis settings. In the "checkers" they can play, and it is not only about a taxi. As in the case of Hyundai, I happened to work on the junction of the chassis of the new Rio. And if in the design and some trifles between them, you can still find differences, then in the settings of the chassis are absolute twins, and the meager difference in sensations is determined by tires. The developers at first wanted to give Kia Rio more sporting temper. But porridge still as possible to spoil oil. Therefore, as a result, I wonderfully left the same ride settings as Hyundai, good new Solaris. As part of the manageability, it was almost unable to a standlock of the class.

Here and Rio with a change of generation made a huge leap on the way to the stability of relationships between rear suspension and body, especially on. It was enough to put the rear shock absorbers vertically, and there was no trail from the past wagging the feed. The sedan willingly dives into the arc, and the electric power supply supplies the steering wheel albeit synthetic but timely weight. Like a solaris, Kia's steering wheel is slightly tightened in "zero", but this does not spoil the overall impression.

Skoda is also not miss! In the protracted turn, the trajectory is not "in a budgetary" long. In the limit, groans the tendency to excessive turning, which is expected to go into the skid, it is necessary to sharply trust the steering wheel. Rapid also disables the stabilization system. Although it works on glory, preventing the entry into dangerous corners when breaking the wheels.

On straight Skoda is stable, it does not respond at the side wind and the rut. Kia with Hyundai require a periodic course adjustment, but the reaction to the steering wheel is sharper. Despite the nuances, the handling of all cars is reliable. What is needed by the mass consumer!

Tractor armed always was strong side Rio.. The situation has not changed now: the 123-strong Motor of the Gamma series in a pair with a proven six-speed hydromechanica is quite enough for everyday ride. But for the "shootings", the pedal must be crushed more active, because the peak of torque sat down almost 5,000 rpm, and on the bottoms, the engine sleeps frankly. Fortunately, the machine promptly switches, finely feeling the moment - and time, and traction.

Solyaris has the same box, but it seems to be unloaded by intelligence. Riding resembles Linkin Park songs: a calm verse explodes at accelerating the engineering engine. The machine scatter refuses to reduce the transfer until you press the pedal to the floor. And this designer does not heal - there is no gym. But stops Solaris delicate, allowing jewelry to dose a slowdown. The Rio drive is tacked sharp and already in the initial phase creates a decent pressure in the hydraulic system. As a result, it is necessary to get used to the tender pedal, in order to avoid "Klekov" when braking.

The braking path of Skoda is a little longer, but in the informativeness of the pedal they will not refuse. But its energy-free Rapid is on firewood. If Rio and Solaris simply accelerate well, then the rapid dynamics almost the reference for the class. And it's not just the limiting acceleration, but also in the convenience of controlling overclocking dynamics.

The Korean engine Gamma sings at very high notes, and Skodovsky TSI confidently feels in the entire turn range, the good two hundred Newton-meters of the moment is available from almost the lowest. Classic "six-chain" Azian machines are powerless before the preselection of DSG, "shooting" seven gears immediately from two shafts. As a result, Rapid is able to quickly dissolve Solaris with Rio in his small mirrors. But does DSG leave without repair so much how many ordinary machines live? Question!

Shake quiet!

You want or not, but the Rapid must be placed in front of the Coldes: the suspension is hard to hang up. Not particularly ceremony Skoda and with road trifles - you feel all the joints! Rio and Solaris to similar flaws are noble. But if the suspension works confidently, it is easier to catch a shock in the course of compression. Therefore, in front of the "lying police" and they are better slowing down with such rigid bodies. Of course, all three cars can not be ranked to the bobes, but to such masters of digesting terrible roads, as Lada Vesta and Renault Logan., they are far away.

Turbomor Skoda is a much quieter of the younger atmospheric 1.6 with a capacity of 110 hp, but his voice soloins in a general noise background at low and medium rates. And when the speedometer arrows exceeds 100 km / h, aerodynamic noise, especially strong in the mirror area, come out. However, they are not annoying. Road noises also do not exceed the unpleasant threshold at any speeds and coatings. What you can not say about Solaris.

The bottom of Hyundai is processed by an additional "Shumkov", but the buzz from tires is the same as in frankly budgetary machines. Okay, I'll tell you that we have Solaris from the first parties that have not passed the additional processing of the rear wheeled arches. But how to explain vibrations on idling When the fan is enabled and the air conditioner compressor? Steering wheel, driver's seat and selector boxes in these moments are reduced to convulsions.

Surprisingly, there are no such problems in Rio. Although, opening the hoods, we made sure that visual engines shakes the same. Nevertheless, it comes to the KIA controls only hardly catchy itching. Perhaps the case in engine supports? But they, judging by catalog number, the same. This was confirmed by the factory. Wonders!

In Kia is also imperfect, but definitely better: the bottom and rear wheel arches Processed from birth. The result is "on the ears."

Crossroads

Related Rio and Solaris did not become absolute twins. Solaris is better I slow down and face went more successful. KIA is literately configured the box below the level of vibrations. However, the differences are so insignificant that we put the same estimates with cars.

However, something suggests that the Kia market will speak brighter. Basic Solaris is cheaper, but is inferior in equipment. So, RIO is supplied with default conditioner - for many this is a significant argument. And the most popular version with a machine gun and on average, Comfort is almost 30 thousand cheaper.

Rapidu to them in terms of sales - drive and not catch up. And it is hardly helping the fact that in today's battle he came out the winner. The case is not at all price. After all, if you refuse options, the price tag will drop to the Korean plank. At the same time, the rapid is an excellent motor, a fast box and a spacious salon. All with it! So why is Rio and Solaris more popular? Look, Koreans know some special secrets of the game in market checkers who have long turned into chess.

The editors are grateful to the LCD "Ecodolie" for helping in the organization of shooting

These manufacturers

In the local market of class B sedans are the most popular models. In connection with the crisis of 2014, there was a sharp one for the same class C leaders such as Ford Focuswho previously had an average of 500 thousand rubles, to date went up to at least 800 thousand. Under these conditions, the popularity of more compact sedans increased, although their value increased, reaching the previous price level of class C models. And yet now such cars are sold in the largest quantities. One of the leaders of the local market is Kia Rio. Many other models are also very popular. Among them are Skoda Rapid. The following reviewed "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": what is better and how to choose.

Origin

Kia Rio is a small-class Korean model, which has been produced since 2000. The first two generations of the car were identical for various markets, but the third, which appeared in 2011, decided to divide. Therefore, the model sold in the local market is significantly different from the machines presented in Europe and North America. This is explained by the fact that a modification for the Chinese market was adopted as the basis for the Russian Rio, called K2. In fact, this is the same car with minor changes for local conditions. The model is based on the updated platform Hyundai Accent.. In 2015, she has undergone restyling.

Skoda Rapid is a relatively new Czech model that appeared in 2012 since Skoda is a division of Volkswagen Audi Group, Rapid is based on one of the options for the common platform of the concern A0 - PQ25. Therefore, many nodes and aggregates are borrowed from other models.

If you choose from this point of view "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid" (which is better), it looks more preferably as it is not a simplified version for developing countries, but a uniform model for all markets, albeit budget.

Body

Kia Rio is presented in two bodies: 5-door hatchback (C 2012) and 4-door sedan (from 2011). Traditionally, in the local market, the sedan is much more popular. Its length is 4.38, wheelbase - 2.57 m, width - 1.7, height - 1.47. Hatchback 0.25 m in short, the remaining sizes are identical. At the sedan, the volume of the trunk is 500 liters, at the hatchback - 389 liters.

Skoda Rapid has a body of a liftback. In the form, it resembles a sedan, but the trunk lid is combined with rear glass. The length of the car is 4.48, the wheelbase is 2.6 m, width - 1.7, height - 1.47. The volume of the trunk is 550 liters.

Determine on the basis of this, "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": what is better, difficult. As can be seen, the dimensions of these models are very close, especially if we consider sedan Rio.. Although RAPID body is more practical, as it combines the qualities of the sedan and hatchback.

According to the design "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": what is better, the photo will allow you to determine. In general, Kia has a more youth style, and Skoda is decorated traditionally for the manufacturer models.

Chassis

Since Rio is based on the Accent platform, the suspension is the same as this model. That is, the front is represented by McPherson racks, rear - semi-dependent design. The car is configured by good behavior on asphalt roads. Ground clearance At the same time, it is 16 cm, which is provided with modifications for local conditions. Rio equipped with 15-inch wheels. Brakes on the front wheels disc ventilated, rear for modification of 1.4 liters drum, for 1.6 l - disk.

The elements of the chassis Rapid are borrowed from other manufacturer models. So, Fabia is taken front and the rear semi-dependent beam is borrowed from the OCTAVIA of the first generation. Road clearance is 17 cm. Available wheels with a diameter of 14 to 16 inches. The rear brakes of the simplest version also drum. For other options, all discs.

On the chassis, determine, "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": what is better, it is also difficult. As can be seen, the design of the suspension is identical. Differences are in the settings.

Engines

Rio for the local market is equipped with two power units.

G4FA is an initial four-cylinder 1.4 liter engine. The power of it is 107 liters. p., Torque - 135 nm.

G4FD has the same design, but more than 0.2 liters volume. Due to this, the power is higher at 16 liters. s., Torque - 20 nm.

Both motor are designed for gasoline AI-92.

For the local Rapid version there are three power units available.

CJZC - a four-cylinder engine with a distributed injection has a volume of 1.6 liters. Its power is 90 liters. s., Torque - 155 nm.

CJZD is the engine of the same design and volume, but more powerful by 20 liters. from. Torque is the same.

CZEA is a four-cylinder motor having a smaller volume (1.4 l), but equipped with a turbocharger and direct injection system. This allows it to develop 125 liters. from. and 200 nm.

Power units Rapid is calculated at least 95 gasoline.

Kia Rio or Skoda Rapid: What is better on the range of motors - it is difficult to say unequivocally. The power units of the Korean model is simpler according to the design, so less demanding of the quality of fuel, which ensures less costs. Rapid Motors Gamma is slightly wider, which allows customers to more accurately choose a car based on needs. In addition, it contributes to the expansion of their audience, as the engines cover a more extensive range of characteristics.

So, CJZC is the most economical and approximately corresponds to 1.4 l Motor Rio. CJZD performance is between kIA enginesBut closer to 1.6 liters. The most powerful RAPID motor, CZEA, exceeds 1.6 liters of Korean power unit.

Transmissions

For the initial motor, the Rio offers a 4- and 5-speed automatic and mechanical gearbox, respectively.

Options with an engine of 1.6 liters are equipped with more modern 6-speed automatic and mechanical gearbox.

The simplest version of Rapid is equipped with a 5-speed mechanical gearbox.

For a more powerful 1.6 liter of the engine, the same mechanical gearbox is offered, as well as the 6-speed automatic.

The most powerful motor is equipped exclusively 7-speed robotic gearbox DSG.

"Skoda Rapid" or "Kia Rio": what is better in the range of transmissions - also ambiguous. In general, the range of options for gearboxes is more extensive in Rio. It is represented by four PPC: 5- and 6-speed automatic and mechanical. Three gearboxes are available for Rapid: 6-speed automatic, 5-speed mechanical and 7-speed robotic. At the same time, for two engines (the simplest and most powerful) there is no gearbox.

Rio each engine is equipped with two gearboxes, although they are still fixed for various complete sets. The main advantage of Rapid is the presence of a complex robotic DSG, but the more perfect 6-speed mechanic is available for Rio than Skoda.

Salon

If we consider the interiors of such machines as "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid", what is better? Car overview by journalists gives the greatest information.

In their opinion, according to the ergonomics, Skoda is superior to KIA, since, unlike it, it has adjustments to the seating in height and the steering wheel. In addition, Rapid has a niche in the back of the cabin for various items.

By the comfort of "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": what is better? The review also testifies in favor of Skoda. Larger RAPID adjustments provide convenience on front seat. In the rear row with similar sizes, more space in height and width. Back rear seat Skoda also has a greater slope, which improves convenience.

By the quality of salons "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": What is better? Reviews of owners and opinions of journalists indicate that the salon korean car Quality. They celebrate the best plastics and self-cleaning cloth of seats.

Performance

Most simple modifications Both cars are almost the same in dynamics. Rio with mechanical checkpoints accelerates to 100 km / h in 11.6 s and is able to accelerate to 185 km / h. Skoda reaches the same maximum speed, but accelerated by 0.2 with faster. Second modification Skoda. With 1.6 liters, the engine is accelerated to 100 km / h in 10.3 s and reaches 195 km / h. On acceleration, it is equal to the most powerful Rio, and at speed even 5 km / h surpasses it.

On the acceleration of the fastest turbocharged Skoda to 100 km / h leave 9 s, maximum speed equal to 208 km / h.

The 4-speed PPP Rio is soft and slow, and the Skoda machine is slower than 6-speed Korean checkpoint. About DSG mainly negative reviews both in smoothness of work and reliability. Mechanical PPC Rapid has no 6 transmission, which affects economy.

To the question: "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": what is better to choose on the dynamics? "- You can answer: Skoda with a 1.4 liter engine. The simplest versions are approximately equal, and Rapid with a medium engine actually lags from 1.6 L Rio, although a little faster according to data.

According to the controllability of "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": what is better? Feedback testify in favor of Skoda. It has greater informative of management bodies, accuracy of reactions and stability. Rio is less accurate and stronger than the cub.

Comfort

Good RAPID handling is achieved due to the increased stiffness of the suspension. Rio settings are softer, so it is more smoothly undergoing irregularities. However, in some conditions a routing is manifested. Also due to lack of energy intensity on large irregularities, trifles are possible.

For acoustic comfort, cars are approximately equal.

Economy

By fuel consumption, cars are very close. 1.4 l Motor Skoda is distinguished, which, according to data, is a bit more economical. However, Rapid can only be charged with 95 gasoline, while Rio is enough AI-92.

Cost

For the price of cars are also close. Rapid in the initial version is cheaper (574 thousand rubles, while Rio costs 611.9 thousand). Basic cost more powerful versions It differs significantly less (in just 2000). Turbated Skoda can be bought at the price of 886 thousand at the same time recruitment Rio. Richer, and on Rapid has to buy a lot of equipment.

RESULTS

Rapid exceeds Rio by manageability, ergonomics, practicality, spacious in the rear row and dynamics due to the presence of 1.4 liters of motor. Rio is more comfortable, has a better finish and more economical, thanks to the possibility of using 92 gasoline.

At the same time, by the number of RAPID sold cars behind Rio is about 3 times. For the first 9 months of this year, more than 62 thousand RIOs were sold and more than 19 thousand Rapid. Thus, Rio ranks third in the market, and Skoda is the fourteenth.