New Camry or Mazda 6. Toyota Camry against competitors - a comparative test. What to choose, if each salon has its own minuses and its advantages

In January 1980, Celica Camry came to the Japanese market, which, despite the name, was designed on the basis of the then Carina. The medium-sized sedan with chopped edges has not lived for a long time, but his name was not lost. And if about the same Selik in Russia, it will remember except that the big fan of Toyota, then everything knows about Camry. At first it was allocated to the original model, and then, in favor of the growing market of North America, increased, including stylish. So, they began to simultaneously produce two Camry - "narrow" and "wide." About the "narrow", again, remember the adepts and fanatics, and the "broad" not only lives, but also to envy competitors shows completely exemplary sales, at least in their main market - in the United States. And the model of the sixth generation, presented in Detroit last year, is no exception.

In Russia, the class of medium-sized Camry sedans again covers all like a bull sheep: the only one hundred percent once competitor, Nissan Teana, which turned in his last generation American Altima, predicted left the market. The worships can say that, they say, Camry - Queen of the official garages. This is partly so, however, even if the deduction of 9,609 specimens sold in the past year of Camry, I still, the advantage over the same Mazda 6, which almost no in the fleet (426 pieces) will be trottered.

1 / 2

2 / 2

From secret protocols

Nevertheless, the new Camry should catch up with Mazda, and immediately at several points! The first one seems to be in doubt - the audience. According to the marketologists of Toyota, a competitive "six" in Russia prefers "young" and "distinctive" (seeking to emphasize their individuality buyers). Moreover, according to the conditional indicator, determined by the ratio of two of these characteristics, Mazda 6 in Russia is generally leading - only Kia Optima. In the last generation, I could get closer to it, the rest are far away. Camry also buyers are solid conservative, traditional. And the task of the new model is not just to save the old (in the literal and figurative sense), but also to get new ones. Is it possible?

Next, there is a "pleasure of driving", attributed to the "dynamics". If someone confuses the word "dynamics" against Mazda 6, look at the American market: there is a restyling model for sale with a motor from CX-9 - 2.5 liters and turbocharging. Interestingly, the version presented in Los Angeles last November, with a new lattice of the radiator and a slightly modernized interior, are not going to sell in Russia. At least, the press service of the brand assures us that the decision on this issue is not accepted, and if it is accepted, then in a year. In this sense, the car presented in our test is not at all the "lame duck".

However, this is not all. In the village of Toyota, their own model is considered ... Stand - do not fall ... Do not fall - stand ... Technically backward! Yes, yes, this is the inelace "positioning among competitors." "Technical Advance" Mazda 6 is estimated at 0.96 points (maximum one), and Camry is 0.87. What does it have to do with japanese Bestseller ranked last among all competitors russian market a place!

Content and content

Engines:

Toyota Camry. / Mazda6.

2.5 L, 181 hp / 2.5 L, 192 hp

Justice for the sake of say that the previous one generation Toyota Camry with "technical advocacy" and was really tight, and new? In the new - everything seems to be perfect: and the GA-K platform (as the brainchild of the TNGA architecture), and the upgraded rear suspension, and the power system with the "double injection", and 8-speed hydromechanical machines, and the phase adjustment carried out by the electromotor , and ... alas, touch all this beauty, and it is not fully fully, we will bring only owners of the most powerful version - with the newest aggregate of 3.5 liters, which for our market is offered in the version with a reduced degree of compression. Meanwhile, according to statistics, in the past generation Camry, a modification with V6 was preferred only 12.5%. Another 7.5% was preferred by the basic version with a 2.0-liter motor, and the remaining 80% took 2.5 liters. That is why this execution and turned out to be on our test. And this, of course, is not an American version with the D-4S nutrition system (injection and cylinders, and in inlet pipes) and a compression ratio of 13.0, and a well-known motor with a distributed injection motor, compression of 10.4 and 6-speed box in addition.

It is clear that the very desired speaker new car With this engine is not ahti, especially since it is limited and the former "vegetable" settings electronic block Office force aggregate, and the lack of stealing petals, and even the fact that the new Camry has become harder to the old at least 40 kg. Gas pedal in Toyota is very easy, which is justified - it is extremely inert. The engine responds to the actions of the driver with a pedal with a very large delay, and it does not work out from the box of operational switching, it does not seem to be in manual mode. However, I partly managed to "raise" the hydromechanic - already on the second day she started more fun "smooth climbing "However, no matter how the feeling of" dynamics ", of course, does not have, especially since the possibilities of manual decrease are almost completely absent. Probably on some very color descent, so as not to warm the brakes, this box and will fit, but nothing more.

By the way, it was discovered in this automatic trans-"glitch". Somehow standing on the traffic light, I transferred the selector to the position S and, without moving from the place "rose" to the sixth gear - on the side computer caught fire: "S6". What was my surprise when, when starting, overclocking and subsequent stop, the inscription "S6" continued to burn, although the steps in the box, of course, switched. Meanwhile, the electronics of New Camry in principle has some discrepancies with reality. For example, with a "manual" drop from the 2nd to the 1st, when the figure 1 lights up on the screen (approximately at 50 km / h), the box still continues the procedure for changing the stage while the speedometer arrows time to fix the drop drop slightly not 10 km / h

His contribution to the "antidynamic" behavior Camry makes and setting the brake pedal. In fairness, we note that the characteristic has become significantly better, but this is only the effect of a "low base", because before it was simply criminal. And now the pedal can safely live on half of the course, and after that it is also hard to devoid - then the slowdown will be felt.

In contrast

On Toyota background Camry Sedan. Mazda 6 - Straight Rulley Boll. Actually, our colleague Andrei Sobbin, burdened by extensive experience in all sorts of rally raids, while last year on vacation in Portugal, did not refuse himself the pleasure of ride at Mazda 6 for several dopama "Rally Portugal". Of course, it does not go about any fighting piloting, but this particular example speaks of the difference in manageability and the opportunities that engineers left the drivers of these two sedans.

Toyota Camry / Mazda6
Consumption per 100 km

First, in Mazda there are petals - comfortable, neat, closely pressed to the back of the "Baranki"; Operate them - one pleasure. Secondly, the settings of the power unit even in normal mode - better than those that have Camry in manual. The gas pedal is "dense", with a small return, which, in sensations, accurately coincides with the engine reactions and with how the pedal has been added to the pedal, the machine dials. Opportunities for braking is also not so that, but still better than in Toyota.

The gearbox at Mazda is also a 6-speed, and the transition to 8 steps is not foreseen. Meanwhile, it does not prevent the car to demonstrate a completely moderate fuel consumption and not least in the city. First, like any atmospheric, a 2.5-liter Mazda unit in 192 hp Not so depending on the traffic jams as dumb downsaysing motors. According to the not chib to loaded the city, it stacked at 9 l / 100 km. By the way, it seems that this version of the Sixters is even more economical base (150 hp): more powerful motor It is easier to cope with the big sedan, and for the dynamic driving from the traffic light to the traffic light, there is no need to turn the crankshaft above 2,500-3,000 rpm. I-Eloop braking energy recovery system helps (by the name of which I immediately came up with a nickname Hayilup), which, according to developers, when driving in the city with frequent stopping stops, it saves at least 5% of fuel, and then and 10. It is interesting that it is only available for a 2.5-liter motor.

In fact, what is easier: do not twist the generator from the engine constantly, and to use the deceleration modes for this to obtain electricity. The process of its "return" can be observed on the display of the multimedia system - it is provided for a separate mode. When the gas is reset, the generator that can work both in 12V mode and in 25T mode, begins to transmit the "recreated" electricity into the condenser, which is installed in the front of the machine under the hood. As soon as the condenser is filled in - a minimum for this you need 7 seconds - "Finish" inscription lights up on the display. This means that, if necessary, the capacitor can reset the accumulated charge into a regular 12-volt battery. The Stop & Start system also contributes to fuel economy.

The Russian Camry with a 2.5-liter (188 hp) does not have the engine of all this beauty, and in addition, a car built on a new platform, for some reason, it turned out to be heavier than a competitor. Compare: The range of the outfit masses at Mazda 6 is 1 395-1 486 kg, and Camry - 1 570-1 700. This is the difference in kilograms in many respects and determines the difference in fuel consumption - on average, Mazda 6 is obtained per liter-one and a half Less than Camry.

Acceleration up to 100 km / h

Toyota Camry / Mazda 6

On complete contrast

Not to say that Toyota so nothing to boast. Let's say, she is noticeably quieter (which, apparently, added a dozen-other kilograms), the suspension is now less brings in turns - it became more assembled, but it was not completely corrected completely from previous diseases. Let's say, even when moving at a level (60-80 km / h) on a flat, without chosen to urban asphalt, passengers feel noticeable body fluctuations, and, both in the longitudinal and transverse plane. Steering wheel - Heavy, while preserved blurred and wide incommunical zone, which is practically no Mazda. As for the manageability as a whole - the new Camry, of course, is better holding the trajectory, but in many ways it is, oddly enough, the merit of the rear suspension, which, in fact, has changed constructively - on the "fifth wide Camry" from the back were the racks of McPherson, now - Already a multi-dimension. That is, Camry has become better, but so far in this respect it wins mostly for the oldest.

The most strongly adherents of Camry will make changes in ergonomics, especially in the part of the instrument panel, however, wherever Kin is not a solution to the solutions of their controversial, and the range of possible complaints is quite wide. For example, the dials seem to be unreasonably far from each other, drawing and the font is such that three-digit numbers on the speedometer are not as easy and quick as they would like, and they themselves are too brought together with each other. Meanwhile, most complaints cause the display of the display of the side computer - both by the graphic part and on the logical, and the brightest illustration of this claim - the tab with the data on the consumption of fuel. The tilted stripes actually turned out to be a scale with a consumption values, the top light blue flag with a strange inscription "After Zap-SKA" - only the visualization of the data on consumption (I understood it when the dark-blue checkbox appeared below, "after discharge "), And the background specks, leaving the distance - turned out to be nothing more than just specks.

1 / 11

2 / 11

3 / 11

4 / 11

5 / 11

6 / 11

7 / 11

8 / 11

9 / 11

10 / 11

Comparing such known brands Japanese car manufacturers like Mazda 6 or Auto Toyota Camry, it must be remembered that this technique has many similar features and a minimum of discrepancies. Both cars are designed for the same segment of buyers.

It should be noted in advance that the most objective will be a comparison of cars equivalent by configuration and belonging to about one period of release. This comparison will be involved in the model in maximum configuration - Toyota Camry of the 7th generation of 2014 release and Mazda 6 of the 3rd generation of 2015. Both machines are equipped with maximum volume engines - 2.5 liters. To be more accurate, Camry for most markets, in addition to domestic, has a somewhat larger engine volume, but in 2013 it has been reduced to comply with the requirements of the road collection rate. Such a move raised the competitiveness of the model.

On both models of cars installed six-speed box automata.

Exterior of cars

They have almost identical dimensionsBut Camry or Auto Mazda 6 cannot be confused, they look so differently. Mazda profile is more rapid, approaching sports. Salon is somewhat shifted back, with the result that the six reminds a little sports car.

A Toyota looks completely different, having a massive, more rigorous and presentable body. Thanks to such details, it can be assumed that Mazda is more suitable for young and active people, and Toyota, opposite, power and solid businessmen who value comfort and rigor above external view and speed.

Salon

Ergonomics of controls in both cars is quite thoughtful, and therefore it is very difficult to compare. Climate control authorities, acoustics are easily accessible and intuitive.

The instrument panel in the Mazda is made in black and gray shades without special excesses. In Toyota, many cause decorative inserts under the tree on a torpedo, central tunnel and door cards.

It is impossible to say what car is better than the seat, since they are very high quality in all embodiments. Softeful in Mazda and dense in Toyota, they do not cause discomfort in long-distance travel, because they have a convenient profile, developed lateral support and support for the legs.

Comparison of places for rear passengers It will not be in favor of Mazda 6, since it has a lower ceiling, and at a high passenger on rear seat There is a chance to get your head to the ceiling. At the same time, the dimensions of the cabin in width and length are sufficient for the comfortable placement of passengers of any growth, even with a completely advanced driver's seat.

Challenges

The same engine power and an equal number of switching steps in the automatic transmission does not yet mean that challenges cars will be the same. Mazda 6 vs Auto Toyota Camry in this comparison a little wins, because it is characterized by noticeably better dynamics with a smaller fuel consumption.

The test drive shows that the Mazda automatic transmission smoothly and imperceptibly switches the transmissions without signs of thoughtfulness, clearly reacting to the position of the pedal, while Toyota behaves more confidently behaves with a measured ride style. When you try to increase the dynamics, small delays of the machine reaction to press the gas pedal appear. Yes, and fuel consumption, even when driving on the highway, not clearly in favor of Toyota.

The handling of both cars is excellent at any speeds, rolls in turns, of course, are present, but demolitions are not observed.

If you compare the steering, then the Mazda is more informative, the steering wheel is clearer here. Brakes are clear and confident, there are no complaints in any of the compaable cars.

The suspension is made in the usual way - in front of an inexpensive MacPherson, and the back is the usual multi-dimensional. Setting the suspension elements is better at Toyota. This is noticeable when driving on uneven roads. Mazda most of Large irregularities are transmitted by unpleasant and well-distinguisible blows in the body. It aggravates the situation and weaker insulation of the cabin, especially the wheeled arches.

Luggage compartment

Both cars have a good spacious trunk, with a standard amount for cars of this class - within 500 liters. Loading opening is sufficient for dimensions to put volumetric boxes or other overall cargo. Dimensions luggage compartment You can enlarge if folded a number of rear seats.

Safety

Competitors provide high level security driver and passengers due to availability full set Airbags and careful design of body elements. According to the results of crash tests, both cars received the maximum number of points.

General advantages and disadvantages

In general, both cars are almost equivalent. The largest drawbacks of Mazda are weak noise insulation, low salon and stiffness suspension. Advantages are excellent dynamics and management, efficiency, elegant appearance.

Toyota disadvantages are sluggish steering, low efficiency, shortcomings in the design of the cabin. Advantages - a spacious interior, a soft suspension, excellent noise insulation.

The cost of maintenance in Mazda is somewhat higher, but the cost of spare parts, on the contrary, is lower than that of Toyota. Consequently, the cost of a new and old car Will be very different in both cases. It is necessary to take into account, given the age of the acquired car and the term that is assumed to be opened.

conclusions

When comparing the external and internal qualities of such cars, like Toyota Camry or Mazda 6, you need to understand that, being in the same class, they are designed for different categories of owners. Bright and dynamic Mazda is more suitable for young and middle age people who love dynamic ride style. Toyota, as a more executive car, is intended for solid, business consumers who are more appreciated comfort and prestigious look, are not particularly hurry, preferring power and dimension.

Toyota Camry and Mazda 6 are representatives of the Japanese automotive industry, which is considered one of the leading in the world. Both cars are quite popular among motorists, so they successfully compete in the global market with European and American models. Japanese cars Traditionally, the best development and technologies are distinguished, as well as bold design solutions, but their price remains at a very adequate level, which benefits them to allocate them among many similar cars from the same Europe.

But inside the Japanese car industry there are many cars of about one price category, so motorists often it is often very difficult to make a choice in favor of a model or another. In particular, many wonder what is better - Mazda 6 series or Toyota Camry. Let us try to understand this issue more, appreciating their main technical characteristics.

The appearance of both cars is at a high level, which in itself is understandable, because they are the brainchild of the Japanese car industry. But if you compare them with each other, you can say with confidence that there is a lot of extremely small in them.

Toyota Camry is traditionally presented in the form of a certain monumental image, which at first glance seems to be careless, but in the meantime it is functional and reliable. The reliability of the body is combined with smooth lines, as well as a small amount of chrome finish. There are also 17-inch discs on the car. For many, such a design will seem sufficiently unpretentious, but such a strict style is perfect for motorists of the middle age category, which love comfort and restraint in everything.

Mazda 6 has a more dynamic manner, as well as sport lines. The exterior is quite original, the body is characterized by a spectacular chrome finish. 19-inch discs look quite aggressively, which once again emphasizes the overall sporty image. Mazda cars always looked quite screaming, with the causing exterior, but there is nothing superfluous, so the design of the sixth model is quite organic. It is safe to say that Mazda 6 is an excellent choice for young and ambitious motorists who want to be noticeable in the overall movement strip.

Rigor or modernity - what is better for the interior of the car?

Comparison of the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry can be started with the fact that interior decoration These cars are fully consistent with their exterior. Toyota Camry is characterized by a rather strict interior, in which minimalism predominate and simplicity of lines. Meanwhile, the material of the finish is distinguished by high quality, so the inner decoration is quite consistent with the business person. In the cabin, black color prevails, but there are colored inserts, imitating wood - not the most successful move in our opinion.

The present advantage of Camry is a modern multimedia system with a high-definition display, which allows you to get a high-quality picture. The car's interior is quite spacious, the rear sofa is also characterized by sufficient capacity. By the way, behind riding it is very comfortable, because the distance to the front seats is not enough for the ride itself, but also for working on laptops and tablets. This once again confirms the thesis that Camry is a wonderful car for business people.

With the front chairs, everything is not so rosy. Ownership reviews suggest that the seat back is low enough, which reduces comfort when driving. But there are certain advantages:

• The upholstery of the chairs is very comfortable and pleasant to the touch. It is made of genuine leather, which adds a gloss shared mind.
• The chair can be adjusted in six direction options.
• You can install a memory drive.

As for Mazda 6, the interior of this car is characterized by more modern finishes and design. This can be noticed even on the design of control levers and buttons on the panel, as well as the appearance of the seats. There is also a lot of black in the cabin, but there are several light inserts - on the seats, doors, etc. A fairly good solution that allows you to slightly dilute the lack of colors of the cabin.

The multimedia system turned out to be quite simple if compared with Toyota Camry. The displays is small, so you can forget about a clear picture. But here there is one very interesting solution - the central console is quite original, as well as the navigation and multimedia system made in a separate part.

What to choose if in each salon there are its minuses and its advantages?

From the point of view of the driver's comfort, in our opinion, Mazda 6 looks preferable, but the rear sofa of this car is quite small, so it is unlikely to fit more than two adults. Toyota in this regard looks a more spacious model, but the interior does not differ in some kind of delight and originality. Therefore, if you prefer a quick ride and drive, then it is best for you that Mazda 6 series will fit.

Main technical characteristics

The interior and exterior of the car are important components, but most motorists appreciate them for running characteristics and behavior on the road. The test drive of these models has shown that they almost completely showed the correspondence of their appearance and ride on the track.

Toyota Camry still confirms its reputation for a non-spiritual and measured car. It seems that even this very slowness is more than the situation requires. After pressing the gas, the car does not immediately begin its movement - it seems that it seems that it does not use traction in small revolutions. At the same time, such neatness absolutely does not affect the economy of fuel.

But there are also unconditional positive moments. Toyota Camry distinguishes exceptional smoothness, so you will not notice the pavement flaw when driving on this car. This sedan holds the road perfectly, so only very deep pits or open hatches of sewage can be removed from equilibrium. This plus has the same reverse side - the handling of Camry leaves much to be desired. The car is not only late reacts to the press of the gas pedal, but also on the rotation of the steering column, which makes worry about when entering the turn.

Video Test Drive 2.5 Mazda 6 with speed measurements

Camry under the sight of camcorders with dissection of flaws

Comparing the driving characteristics of these models, then a rather interesting situation is evaporated:

• Acceleration to 100 km per hour - Mazda 6 (7.8 sec), Toyota Camry (9 seconds).
• Maximum speed - Mazda 6 (223 km per hour), Camry (210 km per hour).
• Engine power index - 192 hp Mazda 6 and 180 hp Toyota Camry.

Based on these indicators, it is safe to say that Mazda 6 versions will benefit from Camry with an avid advantage. This is also talking about overclocking up to 100 km, which the "six" is only 7.8 seconds, which corresponds more sports carand not sedan. At the same time, the fuel consumption in Mazda is significantly less - about 8.7 liters in urban conditions, 6.5 liters outside the city. This has become possible, thanks to the use of SkyActiv technology.

Also this car characterizes enough hard suspension. This circumstance allows you to quietly enter even the coolest devices and turns. Again, the stiffness of the suspension feels at any obstacles. At the same time, it is all - and the driver, and the passengers themselves. Mazda 6 versions looks more perfect than other configuration of this brand, but it is also quite weak noise insulation. Therefore, after 300 kilometers the road can be elementary to get tired of the engine noise.

Let us consider in more detail the technical data that allows you to compare these models of the Japanese car industry.

Technical characteristics of Mazda. 6:

• Body type - sedan.
• The volume of the engine is 2488 cm3.
• Drive type - front.
• PPC - 6 automatic transmission.
• Fuel type - 95 gasoline.
• The average fuel consumption is 8.7 liters in urban conditions, 6.5 liters outside the city.
• Car length - 487 cm.
• Width - 184 cm.
• Height - 145 cm.
• Clearance (ground clearance) - 16.5 cm.
• Tire size - 45 R19.
• Weight - 1978 kg.
• Tank (volume) - 62 liters.

Now consider similar characteristics for Toyota Camry:

• Body type - sedan.
• The volume of the engine is 2493 cm3.
• Drive type - front.
• PPC - 6 automatic transmission.
• Fuel type - 95 gasoline.
• The average fuel consumption is 11 liters in urban conditions, 7.8 liters outside the city.
• The length of the car is 482.5 cm.
• Width - 182.5 cm.
• Height - 148 cm.
• Clearance (ground clearance) - 16 cm.
• Tire size - 60 R16.
• Weight - 2160 kg.
• Tank (volume) - 70 liters.

Summing up

It is safe to say that these two cars are absolutely different models, although produced in one country. Not only dimensions, technical data and interior are different, but also the philosophy of these cars. If Toyota Camry is viewed as strict, measured and reliable car For middle-aged business people, Mazda 6 looks like a real rebellion and a driving car. Of course, this is very conditional, but there is such an impression.

What is more reliable? If we consider from this side, then most likely it is Camry. The car has sufficiently small high-speed data, so it is perfect for pragmatic people who are not even loving once again risks. The cost of this car is somewhat higher - about 38 thousand dollars, while Mazda 6 costs about 37 thousand. In our opinion, the price of Toyota is somewhat overestimated, given the speed tests, as well as high fuel consumption.

But the question of the benefit is formed not only on the basis of the value of the model itself, but also further maintenance costs. So, the operation of Camry finds itself more profitable if you judge the maintenance in official dealer centers. However, the repair and purchase of original components will cost for Toyota more expensive - about 15 percent. In any case, the question of choosing a car is a fairly subjective moment, so our task was only to carry out a general comparison of these models.

Video comparison Toyota Camry and Mazda 6

Jackets of New Camry

Review Real Owner Mazda 6

The prestigious models of Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry are well-known representatives of the Japanese car industry. Both cars won a whole army of fans from the moment the first generations appeared on the market. The main task that manufacturers impose on them are dense competition with leading models. automotive concerns from Europe and the USA. The Japanese average-sized "business class" combines advanced technologies, innovation in the field of engine industry and the latest design concepts. The final price is traditionally more affordable compared to similar products of European brands.

Mazda 6 is a 5-seater front-wheel drive car. The machine refers to a spacious class "D". Available options Mazda 6 body layouts protrude 4-door sedan and a practical 5-door wagon. The market today presents the third generation of the model, which has previously passed through restyling. The updated version was presented in March 2015 at the Geneva Motor Show.

Toyota Camry is a 5-seater front-wheel drive car. The model is traditionally offered in the only classical layout of the 4-door Sedan body and is the representative of the "D-class". Already seventh generation Toyota Camry in a restyled version was submitted to the general public within the Moscow Auto Show in August 2014.

In this review comparative Test Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry was held on cars in top-end sets With the maximum expanded package of options that are most in demand among the potential and current owners of the specified cars. Both vehicles received 2.5-liter gasoline atmospheric power units and automatic gearboxes. Mazda 6 Sedan under the hood has a high-tech SkyActiv-G motor and a 6-speed hydrotransformator transmission SkyActiv Drive.Toyota Camry equipped with a DUAL VVT-I motor and a reliable box on 6 gears with a torque converter.

Mazda. 6

Restyling this model did not strongly changed the appearance of the car, but the updated version received a number of noticeable innovations. The most notable in front of the head optics of the new Mazda 6, which now has become adaptive, LED and received advanced functionality. Slightly upgraded and the radiator grille, which received more thin "ribs" and got rid of the top chrome insert. Now all the attention is attracted only to the major brand logo.

The profile of the model has retained the swiftness and hint of "Sport", continuing to play the muscles of the large arches of the front wheels and a slope roof. The sedan looks businessily and strictly, while deliberately emphasized the dynamics in the image. The rear of the car is modern and a little aggressive. Single long stop lanterns are slightly tinted and successfully fit into the stern's design under a small "visor" hanging trunk lid. A neat bumper in the bottom attracts attention to the silvery nozzles on the exhaust pipes.

Toyota. Camry.

After updating, the current generation of the model has become even more presentable. Restyling touched the bumpers and design of the radiator lattice, as well as the head optics of the model. The frontal part has a recognizable edging of chromium at the bottom of the massive front bumper. Neat fog lanterns are now deliberately highlighted against the background of others. body details car. At the bottom of the black ribs of the black grid of the radiator attract.

The side of Toyota Camry is characterized by simplicity and collaboration. The arches of the wheels are distinct, but without accents. The glazing zone did not receive too soft angles, but also sharp plots in the design minimum. Slightly pulls the profile stamping in the area of \u200b\u200bthe door above the threshold. Such a solution visually "facilitates" a large car. The feed of the sedan looks massively and modernly, while maintaining the necessary restraint. Rear lights Large, conditionally divided into the upper and lower part of the silver insert, located along the edge of the wide lid lid of the luggage compartment itself.

The idle of both models is entirely complies with the concept that competing autohydriants from Japan are confirmed in their advanced design. Noticeable bias in the direction of "pseudo-altitude" Mazda 6, which the creators of the new model emphasized all possible methods. It is good or bad, but the sedan continues further from associations with a presentable medium-sized machine for serious business representatives. The car now looks aggressive, reliable and dynamic car. Behind the wheel you expect to see an active young man or a middle-aged driver, which seeks to declare himself and prefers an active drive and a catchy exterior, while moving the presentability and practicality to the background. Toyota Camry turned out to be fully contrast, remaining the right way to their orientation on the audience consistent and confident. The potential buyers of this model will be exclusively male businessmen of middle-aged and elderly, for which comfort, solidity and "classical" restraint in the design of the car above all.

Interior

Mazda. 6

In the cabin of the car used high quality finishing materials. The softness and smoothness of individual parts in the interior perfectly dilute sharp corners and straight lines. Immediately I would like to note the possibility of implementing the combined color gamut of the salon. The main tone is traditional black, but excellent in color chairs, inserts on door maps, central tunnel and torpedoes are able to significantly revive the car from the inside. The only note caused the total area of \u200b\u200bsuch inserts on the central tunnel, since concerns arose about their wear resistance in this place. According to the quality of assembly and fitting Mazda 6, it demonstrates an unexpectedly high class.

In general design, classical solutions prevail. Innovation can be considered the design of the center console and the Multimedia and navigation system and navigation screen is made separately into the top of the torpedo. The second "highlight" becomes a small transparent projection display under the windshield. Neat blowing deflectors in the center placed under a large color multimedia system. The intra-alone climate control unit is partially combined with a CD slot. The climate control window was narrow and relatively small, but the information is read quite comfortable. Large round chrome regulators were separated from the edges of the information field. Interact with them just, so change the settings, pick up right mode or the direction of blowing will not work.

Armchairs in the car are convenient, filler dense and elastic. Side support is developed at the middle level, but the profile itself reliably fixes the saddle. The bottom pillow is well released, providing support for the legs. The high central tunnel is made almost on the same level with a wide armrest. Such a solution allows you to interact with a round knotter on the tunnel with the maximum convenience. The steering wheel is covered with high-quality material, has the rim of the middle thickness and does not slide in his hands. The diameter of the multifunction steering wheel is suitable optimally. Dashboard It has three familiar "well" in silver edging. The combination of bright backlight and markup scales allows you to easily perceive information.

Toyota. Camry.

In the interior of the sedan, everything is both familiar and in their places. Designers did not introduce for this model those bold solutions that can be observed in other cars of the Japanese brand. Toyota Camry received the usual layout of the elements. The materials of the finishing of high quality, the assembly and fit of the panels according to their quality comments did not cause. The main color of the key parts of the cabin is black. Diverse the gamut is not the most successful from the aesthetic side of the color insertion "under the tree" on the torpedo, armrest of door cards and the central tunnel. The degree of their practicality and resistance to scratches can be evaluated during operation.

The central console is a place of concentration for most of the car functional systems. Under a small visor hides a narrow monochrome display of electronic hours. Next, there are strict deflectors by blowing a rectangular shape. The large screen of the multimedia system is planted in a rigorous black frame, and the location of this element itself will emphasize chrome sidewalls. At the level of the upper corners of the screen, there were round brilliant medium-sized regulators and vertical rows of function buttons under them. A small narrow screen with direction indicators, temperature testimony and modes of blowing is surrounded by the perimeter with rows of modest black keys.

Chairs in the car have a profile, designed for simplicity and convenience of landing / disembarking. Side support is available, but developed mediocre. The seats are covered with a material of good quality, got a dense and neat stitching of seams. The filler is soft, but in the chair do not fall. The steering wheel is multifunctional, three-spoke, with pleasant skin material. The rim diameter is well selected, and it is also quite convenient to control the car systems using the joystick buttons on the knucky knitting. The dashboard with a convenient markup of the scale and the powerful backlit is standard. The speedometer is located on the right side, the tachometer is located in the left. The space between them occupies a large vertical screen of an on-board computer.

The interior of sightseeing machines turned out to be cozy, high-quality and stylish. As for the issue of ergonomics, designers and engineers worked well with both Camry and the Japanese "six". Sports Spirit and youth pads can be easily traced in each element of the Mazda salon 6, which literally manites hot saddles with his rapid promise. Toyotan's calm sedan to hurry was nowhere at all and there is no need for electronic systems They did not build up in the model interior to the level of the cult. In the cabin reigns a pacifying paw, setting up on a plumbing and unhurried ride. Not dealt with both sedans and without controversial moments. It is noteworthy that the comments received color inserts both in Mazda 6 and to Toyota Camry. In the case of Mazda doubt, their practicality causes their practicality, and in the case of Toyota, aesthetics suffered a little. Anyway, but the difference in the target audience, which was calculated by these machines, is clearly traced at the slightest attempt to compare Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry at this stage. The result of rivalry becomes very conditional, but still the victory of Mazda 6. The car won the duel due to more "modern" design compared to beaten motives performed by the opponent.

Challenges

Mazda. 6

It's time to test cars on the road and a comparative test drive Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry. After starting, we immediately note the balance and silence when the Mazda engine is running 6. Top up the gas pedal and enjoy a noticeable motorway in low revolutions. The automatic box seeks to maintain fuel consumption at the minimum level, does not drive the tachometer arrow above 2-2.5 thousand / revolutions.

The torque is more than enough for the active start and maintaining a specified tempo when the speed set. You can even play "traffic lights", without forgetting to disable the useful I-STOP system, which is shuffling the motor when stopping. If you translate the box to manual control mode, then the machine is changing in front of the eyes. Peak turnover becomes available to the full, the reaction to the gas pedal is surprised by sharpness. The return from the motor in a bundle with a well-minded automatic transmission was pleasantly pleased.

Mazda 6 chassis has MacPherson Fronts and a multi-line suspension design from behind. With such a chassis, there are various small cracks and small holes are obtained with maximum comfort, since the car tries not to remind these flaws under the wheels with their seats. More serious coating defects end with shaking in the cabin, while there is little from the dimension of wheels. For a relaxed ride on a flat asphalt tracking the suspension and softness is enough.

On the track the picture is a bit different. The car presses to the asphalt, the steering is becoming more informative. In the corners, the sedan is perfectly cling to the trajectory, only occasionally and at high speed resembles a possible demolition along the axes. There are practically no significant rolls on the "arc". Concerning brake system, This node is well customized. The pedal tightly blocks the wheels closer to the middle of the course, leaving the opportunity for soft braking in the "top".

Toyota. Camry.

Apply to the opponent and compare what is better: Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? Run the power unit. Noise insulation and vibration protection are clearly improved compared to previous versions of the model. The engine works barely noticeably, without a "nervous tick" on the steering wheel. Pressing the gas pedal provides smooth pickup. The dynamics is not racing, but the thrust is confident, which provides quite predictable behavior of the car. The 6-step AISIN is configured to save fuel. If you raise the revolutions above 3 thousand, then a decent power reserve is felt.

A large sedan comes to life noticeably as with a speed set and in the process of further maintenance speed \u200b\u200bregime. Automatic box works without complaints. The solution is hydrotransformer and reliable, no "robots". The moment of switching remains invisible to the driver in calm modes, the motor thrust is distributed smoothly. Tandem of the power unit and gearbox provides confident ride. Lovers of the active drive can also count on a light "light", but short pauses appear in a dynamic mode with a sharp impact on the gas pedal.

Toyota Camry has McPherson for the front and multi-block suspension from behind. The chassis settings are aimed at achieving total comfort. The car literally "floats" in small and medium irregularities, while silence in the cabin. Deep pits slightly shake the saddles, but no more. Restyling has made a number of changes to individual nodes of the running, so the smoothness of Toyota Camry is excellent.

The controllability of the model is worthy, the rolls are present, but demolitions are minimal. The steering has retained a certain sharpness, although informativeness at the speed is far from the highest. But turn the steering wheel is easy, especially thanks to the successful settings of the electric power. The only remark was that from one extreme point to another turning the wheels not quite convenient, as it is necessary to make a little more than three full rollets. Brakes are reliable, the car is smoothly and without clutch nose slows down from any speeds.

Test drive of overview models allows you to answer which car is better: Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry. Motor excitement and driving Mazda provide active and even aggressive ride. At the same time, the comfort suffered a little. The noise insulation of the wheeled arches also reminded himself a rustling of tires in the cabin. Toyota Camry turned out to be restrained and soft, with a margin of "horses" under the hood. If we consider that these cars are originally oriented to business representatives, then advantages of Toyota At this stage, the comparison is obvious. Improved handling and outstanding dynamics of "six" flashes against the background of the reference smoothness of the course and the finalized protection of the floor, doors and the arches from the external noise in Toyota Camry. The machine for business should be imputable, quiet and solid, and also to be able to overclock. With this task, Toyota engineers coped to the fullest. Mazda 6 is able to surprise with its accelerated dynamics and a sharp steering wheel, but comfort in this car turned out noticeably less against the background of a solid competitor.

Capacity of the cabin and trunk

Mazda. 6

On the front row of seats there is enough space in width and height. Even the powerful and wide central tunnel does not constrain the widespread sidewal feet. Low landing in chairs allows you to feel free enough, there is a stock of space over your head. The driver will need a minimum of time in order to adjust the chair for the full amenities of landing and comfortable interaction with the pedal node. The departure of the bottom pillow perfectly copes with the function support for the legs, and the back literally merges with the back of the chair.

On the back row of Mazda 6 in the width of the place is quite enough for three passengers. It turns out a little closely, but acceptable. The angle of inclination of the back and the very pillow of the sofa leaves a bit of "air" above the head of high people, but the reserve is meager. The attachment of the roof in this case makes itself felt, although with an average growth of the rear passengers there are no problems. The wheelbase allows you to say that the inhabitants of the sofa will not be resting knees in the backrest of the front seats.

The trunk in the sedan is a standard solution for this class. Loading opening is wide, it is also highlighted and sufficient height. The loops of the cover partially take away the useful space, but there were no significant problems when loading high boxes was noticed. For everyday use of such indicators of the capacity of the luggage compartment, it is quite enough.

Toyota. Camry.

The front row of seats provides an acceptable stock of space in width and height. In the shoulders there is not the slightest hint of pressure, the width of the tunnel is noticeably divided by the front chairs. For the increasing drivers, there will be no so much space above your head, but the problem solves the seat as much as possible. It is convenient to get to the pedals with any cushion and backs settings due to the excellent ergonomics of the pedal node.

In the back row, three passengers are quite comfortable. It is noteworthy that in height of the supply is sufficient, even sedaws with rising above average are not resting in the ceiling. Such an indicator became available thanks to a relatively flat roof and a well-selected tilt of the back. There is enough space for the feet, the impressive wheelbase allows not to sign the front row of the chairs with the knees.

In the trunk, Toyota Camry is realized enough depth, the overall capacity of the capacity in the middle class. Loading opening of the sedan is acceptable in width and height. Without significant difficulties, it is possible to place the volumetric swing in the form of boxes or other inventory.

Economy

Safety

Both cars demonstrated a high level of protection of their passengers. To answer the question of what is better, Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry, let's get acquainted with the results of crash tests. Mazda 6 on the European EURO NCAP system received a maximum rating of 5 out of 5 points. Toyota Camry on Euroncap was not tested, but the car took part in the NHTSA crash test series (American National Traffic Security Management on the track). American tests allowed to identify the shortcomings, which provided Toyota only four stars. It can be created that Toyota Camry is greatly inferior to Mazda 6 on security, but it is necessary to separately take into account the increased demanding of American tests to certain points relatively to those according to the EUROnCAP system. We will allow ourselves to put these cars for one step.

Cost of models

• Price overview Mazda 6 in the maximum configuration without a run: about $ 3,700 dollars.
• The price of the Toyota Camry review in the maximum configuration in without a run: about 38,000 US dollars.

Results of comparison

Mazda. 6

Benefits:

• Stylish and sporty appearance;
• Overclocking dynamics and steering;
• Economical power unit;
• Unusual design solutions in the interior;

Disadvantages:

• Insufficient sound insulation of wheeled arches;
• Doubtful wear resistance of the interior trim materials;
• Stiffness of the suspension on large irregularities;
• Weak LCP and the rapid appearance of scratches in separate places;

Toyota Camry.

Benefits:

• Soft and smooth suspension operation;
• Noticeably improved noise insulation;
• Successfully selected bunch of motor and box;
• Salon solo materials;

Disadvantages:

• Lack of steering of steering;
• Too simple design in the interior design;
• Relatively high fuel consumption;
• Slightly overpriced model value;

Next, try to answer another important question, what is more expensive in service, Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? If you contact official sources and analyze the cost of service on official dealerships, then planned maintenance Toyota turns out a little cheaper compared to Mazda. This statement is fair for the cost of the norms of work and the prices of basic consumables, as well as technical fluids. If we talk about more serious repair and buying original spare parts, then Toyota Camry is a bit more expensive (10-15%) for a number of common positions.

Now summarize and choose the winner. Toyota Camry leads to the totality of preferred qualities. Among the main arguments in favor of this choice, it is worth noting the settings of the chassis of the car, a fairly powerful power unit and silence in the cabin. Such advantages in the process of daily exploration overlook the first plan compared to the bright exterior and the manageability of Mazda 6.

Man is a conservative creature. We all live, guided by the stereotypes imposed from the outside. In particular, it is believed that Toyota Camry is the perfect car for the official who, after a heavy and tense working day, should sit in the car and without adventure, and the minimum amount of effort to get home. In essence, such an image of Camry is not far from the truth.

But Mazda has many associated with a sample of a truly Japanese style, manifested even in trifles. And in general these cars have little. But times are changing, and today these medium-sized sedans have come close to many indicators. So much that the time has come to their detailed comparison: is it really great differences or what they are inspired by - another myth (or fake, as now it has become fashionable to say)? Let's try to figure it out.

Technical features of models

To get the first impression of these cars, it is worth considering their specifications. It is unlikely that it helps determine what is better, Camry or Mazda 6, but some of the potential buyers will surely leave. There will be those who already on the basis of this comparison will consolidate their preferences.

Exterior

After restyling, spent in 2017, the car became much longer and wider, in favor of American motorists who prefer large cars. Well, given the volume of sales of the model in the North American market, such a step can be called justified.

But to say that the car has become more elegant, it is definitely impossible. Here just nothing to catch the eye. Yes, the speakers were added, but it is impossible to judge the appearance. Rather, on the contrary, the increase in the dimensions made the car with massive, heavy and smooth. Looking at the side, such an impression becomes prevalent. The situation and massive lattice of the air intake, almost completely replaced the front bumper, is not here. Behind the view of the new Camry, no less depressing - the convex bumper completely does not harmonize with sloping racks, smoothly overgoing in a short trunk lid.

So I want to assume that the facade, the profile and the back of the model were developed by three different constructors who were forbidden to communicate - they look so divergent.

Mazda 6 was restored in the same 2017, but here traditions were observed -, reminding with their proportions rather a sports car than a sedan. Unlike Camry, the image of the "six" is perceived wholely, the car looks rapid like zipper. And what is interesting - with all its grace, Mazda looks no less solid. Which case, do not look - the advantage on the side of this model, but especially impressive side view: tapering to the front and elevated from the back of the body harmonizes with smooth lines of racks, and thorough the image of the perfect oval of wheeled arches. Experts even compare the model with Jaguar, which, of course, speaks about the talent of Japanese constructors.

So according to the appearance, the question is that better, Toyota Camry or Mazda 6 is inappropriate - TOYOTOVS for this indicator still grow and grow.

Salon and trunk

Leather Salon is an indispensable component of a car similar class. This option is really present in both models. Like a tree panels that do not really look at the place, especially at Camry. It spoils the impression and inexpensive plastic - it seems, here Toyota engineers decided to save a little. As for Falishdeva, the trend has emerged lately, a peculiar trend - to glue a torpedo and a central tunnel with a film imitating carbon, which clearly indicates the imperfection of the interior. And even the multimedia system is here, although it is present in all confinements, budget options It has a monochrome display, which, as the car decreases, becomes colored, and in the end, even get a touchscreen.

The tidy here is easily readable, with soft backlight, which does not cut eyes in complete darkness. Armchair front passenger in expensive equipment Equipped with ottoman - such a level of comfort is extremely rare, except for representatives of the representative class. The rear sofa is spacious, three passengers will be spacious here for all three measurements. But if there are two people from behind, they will be able to lower the central armrest with the climate control control buttons, seat ventilation and music center. The distance to the front chairs is large, working with a laptop from behind - a pleasure. What you can not say about the front chairs, whose back is not high enough, and the seat itself is so flat, which makes it possible to periodically change the position. In a word, the interior of Toyota is far from perfect, although obvious advantages should not be ignored too: it is the possibility of adjusting the front chairs for three planes and six directions, and good skin quality, and the ability to enable the drive option with memory.

Mazda 6 also has Falchdevo, but it is at least here, only a strip on the front panel and only in top modifications. The central console looks solid due to the finishing of black plastic with a glossy surface. It has a climate system display, showing its current settings, as well as a multimedia control panel, with a small display. The dashboard at the Sixters corresponds to fashion trends - the wells scales are very deep, so that the readings do not arise with problems, even if the sun shines directly on the "tidy". But the backlight is too bright, in the dark, the time will need time to adapt, which, of course, is a big minus. Leather finish complaints does not cause. Front leather perforated, eliminating the effect of sliding when the car goes into steep turns.

In general, comparing the interiors of Toyota Camry and Mazda 6 again not in favor of the first model. But the "Sixters" have certain disadvantages. For example, a lot of space is much less - the smaller width of the car is also affected, and the orientation on a sports silhouette with a low-planted roof. In a word, three adults on the sofa will be cleared, especially fat and high. But for two rear passengers, the comfort level will be not less than in Camry.

Engines and transmissions

As you can see, Toyota designers are not too chasing beauty, preferring to improve safety and comfort for driver / passengers. So outside and inside Mazda 6 looks not just preferable - it is headed above the competitor. And after the last restyling in the gamma mazda motors There was a long-awaited turbocharged engine. The 2.5-liter SkyActiv-G justifies its ability to develop 232 liters. from. The maximum torque is achieved at two thousand turns and is 420 nm.

At all modifications without exception, sixdiabands are installed automatic gearbox. We also note that proven and well-manifested atmospheric force aggregates were also subjected to modernization, which allowed to improve their characteristics. So, a two-liter four is now capable of developing 150 "horses", with a maximum cr. Moment of 215 nm, achieved at 4 thousand revolutions / minutes. The 2.5-liter engine producing 195 liters has become more powerful. from. and 259 nm at 4000 revolutions / minutes.

Camry, unfortunately, after restyling under the hood did not appear. Pensioners remained - a time-tested double-liter 150-strong 6Ar-FSE power unit, as well as a more powerful 2.5-liter fellow 2Ar-Fe, which develops 180 horsepower. Both engines are aggregated with a full-fledged sixdiaband machine.

But there is a novelty - a 3.5-liter six-cylinder atmospheric, designated as 2GR-FKS. This engine is characterized by the presence of an upgraded combined injection system, as well as a hydraulic phase beam built into the intake path, which can change phases in a dynamic mode in a sufficiently wide range. In the US, this motor operates at a maximum, issuing 305 "horses", but a version of 249 horsepower restriction is supplied to Russia - so more profitable in terms of taxation. With such an engine running an eighty-band machine.

As we can see, the Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry engines are retaining an approximate parity, although it depends on the user preferences here.

Dynamics, fuel consumption

Since both models are considered to be those equipped with 2.5-liter engines, it would be logical to compare Camry and Mazda 6, under the hood of which these power units are hidden:

As you can see, the comparison is again not in favor of Toyota. Camry and after the modernization, marked by the change of generations, remains a leisurely machine. Pressing the accelerator pedal has the appropriate return only after a certain delay. Such an effect is characteristic of turbocharged motors with a deficiency of thrust on low revs. But in this case, the culprit of delays is automatic box. An option with a 3.5-liter engine has the same problems because here it uses almost the same box, upgraded to 8 ranges.

Although the transfers here are long, on fuel economy it does not affect - in urban mode, consumption can reach 15 liters, and in terms of less than 10 l / 100 km in the city it is not necessary to calculate, even if you completely eliminate traffic in traffic jams.

Mazda in all respects is better. According to the dynamics, she will give odds to a competitor in any modes and conditions, be it a high-speed auto track or racing track. Acceleration to "hundreds" during the time, less than 8 seconds is an extra-class indicator characteristic of the sports machine than for a sedan, and even such a dimensional and heavy. The Madovsky sixdia band machine works much shunter, and the motor reacts to the accelerator pedal almost instantly - many compare its dynamics with time when the motors were not limited due to the hard requirements of environmental standards. We add that the application of branded technology SkyActiv allowed mazda engines The most economical in the category of medium-sized business class sedans - even with an active urban ride, an indicator of less than 8 l / 100 km is rather typical than amazing.

Handling and security

We have already noted that externally Camry seems heavy, slow and slow. In general, such characteristics correspond to reality, but what the Toyota does not take away, so it is an unprecedented smoothness of the course. If you have not previously come across business class cars, you will definitely feel a huge difference. Small defects of the Camry road cannon does not feel at neither fast or slow ride. You will be able to feel soft shocks only when driving a car wheel on serious irregularities like a lying policeman or large-scale chosel.

But, as is known, handling and comfortableness - antagonistic concepts. So with handling here is not so good. As we have already noted, Camry has become reacting to pressing the gas pedal, but also the same story with the board - newcomers need a lot of time to adapt to such behavior of the machine.

The Mazda suspension has much hard, thanks to which the image of a car with sports inclinations was firmly fixed for this model. You will not see the roll on speed turns here, which allows the car confidently feel on the tracks with a complex geometry and relief.

Of course, serious irregularities unnoticed will not remain - on the part of the comfortability of Mazda 6 is not the most best sedan. Another notable drawback is an increased noise of the car. Although in this direction, attempts were made to correct the situation, Sixer and today is considered a noisy car. To such an extent that, having driven 300-400 kilometers, you will want to stop and give to relax your ears.

Comparison of Mazda 6 and Toyota Camry on this criterion demonstrates that if you like a comfortable ride, then here is a Camry explicit leader, and if your prerogative is a speed, then Mazda will be clearly preferable.

Service cost

Due to certain circumstances, this characteristic of the car is of great importance, as. If you are a responsible car owner and do not miss a visit to official dealer centers for regulatory maintenance, then definite Mazda service will cost you more.

The fact is that the cost of Normochas and the cost of most consumables from the "six" above. But if serious repair is required, and you prefer to use only original spare parts, then the situation will change no longer in favor of Toyota, and significantly - on average percent for 10.

Configuration and prices

Both models represent one price group. Of course, the differences in the configuration are available, and it is they can increasing the scales in one direction or another.

Mazda 6 in the minimum configuration with two-liter engine It costs 1.45 million rubles, the corresponding grade "Standard" at Camry will cost the buyer at 1.52 million.

Total model a number of Toyota. Camry has 7 complete sets. Topova is an Executive Safety, equipped with an 8-range automatic transmission and a 3.5-liter power unit. It costs from 2.43 million rubles.

Already in the base version, Camry is equipped with LED head optics and fog-tanks, also on LED lamps, alloy discs, electrically regulating outer mirrors, power windows of all windows with AUTO function, rain sensor, and motor start button. List of funds passive security and electronic assistants are also extensive - 4 PB (front / side), security curtains, start assistant on the slope, ABS / EBD systems.

Mazda 4 configurations, three of them are equipped with atmospheric engines, and the 2.5-liter turbocharged unit is available only in the top modification of Executive Plus 2019, the price tag for which is 2.17 million rubles.

IN basic configuration You will receive LED optics, 2-zone climates control, front / rear electric windows, electric heating front armchairs, frontal curtains / airbags, full electric car on external mirrors, ABS / EBD and a pressure control function in tires.

What model to give preference

Finding in one price category - this is perhaps the only thing that combines these cars. In all the rest, they are very different. And it's not so much specificationsHow many models in the philosophy, each of which is not new to the market. Toyota Camry is perceived as a strict, reliable car, ideal for the middle age group, and Mazda 6 has a reputation as a rebel, which prefers active young people. Of course, such a maxim can be called quite conditional, but they will not argue with statistical calculations.

What to choose from the reliability point of view, Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? The Toyota brand according to this indicator is generally considered unconditional leader, and this model - not an exception. Yes, its dynamics and high-speed capabilities are not so good, but if you feel about the category of responsible drivers who prefer to avoid all sorts of risks, then your choice is unequivocal.

As for the cost, then, in the opinion of many specialists, Toyota has a slightly overestimated price tags, and such a tendency is observed from year to year. If you take into account the high-speed quality of the car and fuel consumption indicators, then Mazda, standing a little less, looks more preferable.

But in the calculation you need to take not only the current cost of the car, but the cost of its content. If the car is new, then here the advantage on the side of Camry - price tags in official car services speak in favor of this model. But with age, the situation changes - spare parts for the sixth Mazda cost an average of 10-15%, and this should also be taken into account, especially if you practice the frequent change of machines.

Is it possible on the basis of the foregoing to sum up? Yes, of course. Toyota is considered a sample of reliability, but also Mazda in this component is strong. And the comparison is clearly not in favor of Camry, and for many potential buyers it is a fundamental factor. According to the manageability of Sixer, too, a step in front, but for russian roads Toyota is better - It is much more comfortable. Finally, it is impossible not to note the differences in the exterior. If it is important for you to be the owner of a bright car, then Camry is clearly not your choice. And one more point: Mazda is positioned as a car designed for people who loving speed, drive. It is so, but no one forbids you ride on it as you are accustomed.

In a word, we would prefer the "six". But you, of course, may be other preferences, so we are not going to impose your opinion - the final conclusions to do you.